Cargando…

Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers

We evaluated the performance of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests using a reference set of heat-inactivated samples from 278 unexposed persons and 258 COVID-19 patients, some of whom contributed serial samples. The reference set included samples with a variation in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers, as dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lagerqvist, Nina, Maleki, Kimia T., Verner-Carlsson, Jenny, Olausson, Mikaela, Dillner, Joakim, Wigren Byström, Julia, Monsen, Tor, Forsell, Mattias, Eriksson, Jenny, Bogdanovic, Gordana, Muschiol, Sandra, Ljunggren, Joel, Repo, Johanna, Kjerstadius, Torbjörn, Muradrasoli, Shaman, Brytting, Mia, Szekely Björndal, Åsa, Åkerlund, Thomas, Nilsson, Charlotta, Klingström, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87289-6
_version_ 1783675768690180096
author Lagerqvist, Nina
Maleki, Kimia T.
Verner-Carlsson, Jenny
Olausson, Mikaela
Dillner, Joakim
Wigren Byström, Julia
Monsen, Tor
Forsell, Mattias
Eriksson, Jenny
Bogdanovic, Gordana
Muschiol, Sandra
Ljunggren, Joel
Repo, Johanna
Kjerstadius, Torbjörn
Muradrasoli, Shaman
Brytting, Mia
Szekely Björndal, Åsa
Åkerlund, Thomas
Nilsson, Charlotta
Klingström, Jonas
author_facet Lagerqvist, Nina
Maleki, Kimia T.
Verner-Carlsson, Jenny
Olausson, Mikaela
Dillner, Joakim
Wigren Byström, Julia
Monsen, Tor
Forsell, Mattias
Eriksson, Jenny
Bogdanovic, Gordana
Muschiol, Sandra
Ljunggren, Joel
Repo, Johanna
Kjerstadius, Torbjörn
Muradrasoli, Shaman
Brytting, Mia
Szekely Björndal, Åsa
Åkerlund, Thomas
Nilsson, Charlotta
Klingström, Jonas
author_sort Lagerqvist, Nina
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the performance of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests using a reference set of heat-inactivated samples from 278 unexposed persons and 258 COVID-19 patients, some of whom contributed serial samples. The reference set included samples with a variation in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers, as determined by an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The five evaluated rapid diagnostic tests had a specificity of 99.0% and a sensitivity that ranged from 56.3 to 81.6% and decreased with low IFA IgG titers. The specificity was > 99% for five out of six platform-based tests, and when assessed using samples collected ≥ 22 days after symptom onset, two assays had a sensitivity of > 96%. These two assays also detected samples with low IFA titers more frequently than the other assays. In conclusion, the evaluated antibody tests showed a heterogeneity in their performances and only a few tests performed well with samples having low IFA IgG titers, an important aspect for diagnostics and epidemiological investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80272092021-04-08 Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers Lagerqvist, Nina Maleki, Kimia T. Verner-Carlsson, Jenny Olausson, Mikaela Dillner, Joakim Wigren Byström, Julia Monsen, Tor Forsell, Mattias Eriksson, Jenny Bogdanovic, Gordana Muschiol, Sandra Ljunggren, Joel Repo, Johanna Kjerstadius, Torbjörn Muradrasoli, Shaman Brytting, Mia Szekely Björndal, Åsa Åkerlund, Thomas Nilsson, Charlotta Klingström, Jonas Sci Rep Article We evaluated the performance of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests using a reference set of heat-inactivated samples from 278 unexposed persons and 258 COVID-19 patients, some of whom contributed serial samples. The reference set included samples with a variation in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers, as determined by an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The five evaluated rapid diagnostic tests had a specificity of 99.0% and a sensitivity that ranged from 56.3 to 81.6% and decreased with low IFA IgG titers. The specificity was > 99% for five out of six platform-based tests, and when assessed using samples collected ≥ 22 days after symptom onset, two assays had a sensitivity of > 96%. These two assays also detected samples with low IFA titers more frequently than the other assays. In conclusion, the evaluated antibody tests showed a heterogeneity in their performances and only a few tests performed well with samples having low IFA IgG titers, an important aspect for diagnostics and epidemiological investigations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8027209/ /pubmed/33828214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87289-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lagerqvist, Nina
Maleki, Kimia T.
Verner-Carlsson, Jenny
Olausson, Mikaela
Dillner, Joakim
Wigren Byström, Julia
Monsen, Tor
Forsell, Mattias
Eriksson, Jenny
Bogdanovic, Gordana
Muschiol, Sandra
Ljunggren, Joel
Repo, Johanna
Kjerstadius, Torbjörn
Muradrasoli, Shaman
Brytting, Mia
Szekely Björndal, Åsa
Åkerlund, Thomas
Nilsson, Charlotta
Klingström, Jonas
Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
title Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
title_full Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
title_fullStr Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
title_short Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
title_sort evaluation of 11 sars-cov-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined igg antibody titers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87289-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lagerqvistnina evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT malekikimiat evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT vernercarlssonjenny evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT olaussonmikaela evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT dillnerjoakim evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT wigrenbystromjulia evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT monsentor evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT forsellmattias evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT erikssonjenny evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT bogdanovicgordana evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT muschiolsandra evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT ljunggrenjoel evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT repojohanna evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT kjerstadiustorbjorn evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT muradrasolishaman evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT bryttingmia evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT szekelybjorndalasa evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT akerlundthomas evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT nilssoncharlotta evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters
AT klingstromjonas evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters