Cargando…
Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers
We evaluated the performance of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests using a reference set of heat-inactivated samples from 278 unexposed persons and 258 COVID-19 patients, some of whom contributed serial samples. The reference set included samples with a variation in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers, as dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87289-6 |
_version_ | 1783675768690180096 |
---|---|
author | Lagerqvist, Nina Maleki, Kimia T. Verner-Carlsson, Jenny Olausson, Mikaela Dillner, Joakim Wigren Byström, Julia Monsen, Tor Forsell, Mattias Eriksson, Jenny Bogdanovic, Gordana Muschiol, Sandra Ljunggren, Joel Repo, Johanna Kjerstadius, Torbjörn Muradrasoli, Shaman Brytting, Mia Szekely Björndal, Åsa Åkerlund, Thomas Nilsson, Charlotta Klingström, Jonas |
author_facet | Lagerqvist, Nina Maleki, Kimia T. Verner-Carlsson, Jenny Olausson, Mikaela Dillner, Joakim Wigren Byström, Julia Monsen, Tor Forsell, Mattias Eriksson, Jenny Bogdanovic, Gordana Muschiol, Sandra Ljunggren, Joel Repo, Johanna Kjerstadius, Torbjörn Muradrasoli, Shaman Brytting, Mia Szekely Björndal, Åsa Åkerlund, Thomas Nilsson, Charlotta Klingström, Jonas |
author_sort | Lagerqvist, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated the performance of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests using a reference set of heat-inactivated samples from 278 unexposed persons and 258 COVID-19 patients, some of whom contributed serial samples. The reference set included samples with a variation in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers, as determined by an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The five evaluated rapid diagnostic tests had a specificity of 99.0% and a sensitivity that ranged from 56.3 to 81.6% and decreased with low IFA IgG titers. The specificity was > 99% for five out of six platform-based tests, and when assessed using samples collected ≥ 22 days after symptom onset, two assays had a sensitivity of > 96%. These two assays also detected samples with low IFA titers more frequently than the other assays. In conclusion, the evaluated antibody tests showed a heterogeneity in their performances and only a few tests performed well with samples having low IFA IgG titers, an important aspect for diagnostics and epidemiological investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8027209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80272092021-04-08 Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers Lagerqvist, Nina Maleki, Kimia T. Verner-Carlsson, Jenny Olausson, Mikaela Dillner, Joakim Wigren Byström, Julia Monsen, Tor Forsell, Mattias Eriksson, Jenny Bogdanovic, Gordana Muschiol, Sandra Ljunggren, Joel Repo, Johanna Kjerstadius, Torbjörn Muradrasoli, Shaman Brytting, Mia Szekely Björndal, Åsa Åkerlund, Thomas Nilsson, Charlotta Klingström, Jonas Sci Rep Article We evaluated the performance of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests using a reference set of heat-inactivated samples from 278 unexposed persons and 258 COVID-19 patients, some of whom contributed serial samples. The reference set included samples with a variation in SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers, as determined by an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The five evaluated rapid diagnostic tests had a specificity of 99.0% and a sensitivity that ranged from 56.3 to 81.6% and decreased with low IFA IgG titers. The specificity was > 99% for five out of six platform-based tests, and when assessed using samples collected ≥ 22 days after symptom onset, two assays had a sensitivity of > 96%. These two assays also detected samples with low IFA titers more frequently than the other assays. In conclusion, the evaluated antibody tests showed a heterogeneity in their performances and only a few tests performed well with samples having low IFA IgG titers, an important aspect for diagnostics and epidemiological investigations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8027209/ /pubmed/33828214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87289-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lagerqvist, Nina Maleki, Kimia T. Verner-Carlsson, Jenny Olausson, Mikaela Dillner, Joakim Wigren Byström, Julia Monsen, Tor Forsell, Mattias Eriksson, Jenny Bogdanovic, Gordana Muschiol, Sandra Ljunggren, Joel Repo, Johanna Kjerstadius, Torbjörn Muradrasoli, Shaman Brytting, Mia Szekely Björndal, Åsa Åkerlund, Thomas Nilsson, Charlotta Klingström, Jonas Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers |
title | Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers |
title_full | Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers |
title_short | Evaluation of 11 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined IgG antibody titers |
title_sort | evaluation of 11 sars-cov-2 antibody tests by using samples from patients with defined igg antibody titers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87289-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lagerqvistnina evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT malekikimiat evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT vernercarlssonjenny evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT olaussonmikaela evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT dillnerjoakim evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT wigrenbystromjulia evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT monsentor evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT forsellmattias evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT erikssonjenny evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT bogdanovicgordana evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT muschiolsandra evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT ljunggrenjoel evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT repojohanna evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT kjerstadiustorbjorn evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT muradrasolishaman evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT bryttingmia evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT szekelybjorndalasa evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT akerlundthomas evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT nilssoncharlotta evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters AT klingstromjonas evaluationof11sarscov2antibodytestsbyusingsamplesfrompatientswithdefinediggantibodytiters |