Cargando…

Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) seems to overcome a drawback of traditional bipolar tDCS: the wide-spread diffusion of the electric field. Nevertheless, most of the differences that characterise the two techniques are based on mathematical simulations and not on rea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masina, Fabio, Arcara, Giorgio, Galletti, Eleonora, Cinque, Isabella, Gamberini, Luciano, Mapelli, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87371-z
_version_ 1783675770364755968
author Masina, Fabio
Arcara, Giorgio
Galletti, Eleonora
Cinque, Isabella
Gamberini, Luciano
Mapelli, Daniela
author_facet Masina, Fabio
Arcara, Giorgio
Galletti, Eleonora
Cinque, Isabella
Gamberini, Luciano
Mapelli, Daniela
author_sort Masina, Fabio
collection PubMed
description High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) seems to overcome a drawback of traditional bipolar tDCS: the wide-spread diffusion of the electric field. Nevertheless, most of the differences that characterise the two techniques are based on mathematical simulations and not on real, behavioural and neurophysiological, data. The study aims to compare a widespread tDCS montage (i.e., a Conventional bipolar montage with extracephalic return electrode) and HD-tDCS, investigating differences both at a behavioural level, in terms of dexterity performance, and a neurophysiological level, as modifications of alpha and beta power as measured with EEG. Thirty participants took part in three sessions, one for each montage: Conventional tDCS, HD-tDCS, and sham. In all the conditions, the anode was placed over C4, while the cathode/s placed according to the montage. At baseline, during, and after each stimulation condition, dexterity was assessed with a Finger Tapping Task. In addition, resting-state EEG was recorded at baseline and after the stimulation. Power spectrum density was calculated, selecting two frequency bands: alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (18–22 Hz). Linear mixed effect models (LMMs) were used to analyse the modulation induced by tDCS. To evaluate differences among the montages and consider state-dependency phenomenon, the post-stimulation measurements were covariate-adjusted for baseline levels. We observed that HD-tDCS induced an alpha power reduction in participants with lower alpha at baseline. Conversely, Conventional tDCS induced a beta power reduction in participants with higher beta at baseline. Furthermore, data showed a trend towards a behavioural effect of HD-tDCS in participants with lower beta at baseline showing faster response times. Conventional and HD-tDCS distinctively modulated cortical activity. The study highlights the importance of considering state-dependency to determine the effects of tDCS on individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80272182021-04-08 Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS Masina, Fabio Arcara, Giorgio Galletti, Eleonora Cinque, Isabella Gamberini, Luciano Mapelli, Daniela Sci Rep Article High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) seems to overcome a drawback of traditional bipolar tDCS: the wide-spread diffusion of the electric field. Nevertheless, most of the differences that characterise the two techniques are based on mathematical simulations and not on real, behavioural and neurophysiological, data. The study aims to compare a widespread tDCS montage (i.e., a Conventional bipolar montage with extracephalic return electrode) and HD-tDCS, investigating differences both at a behavioural level, in terms of dexterity performance, and a neurophysiological level, as modifications of alpha and beta power as measured with EEG. Thirty participants took part in three sessions, one for each montage: Conventional tDCS, HD-tDCS, and sham. In all the conditions, the anode was placed over C4, while the cathode/s placed according to the montage. At baseline, during, and after each stimulation condition, dexterity was assessed with a Finger Tapping Task. In addition, resting-state EEG was recorded at baseline and after the stimulation. Power spectrum density was calculated, selecting two frequency bands: alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (18–22 Hz). Linear mixed effect models (LMMs) were used to analyse the modulation induced by tDCS. To evaluate differences among the montages and consider state-dependency phenomenon, the post-stimulation measurements were covariate-adjusted for baseline levels. We observed that HD-tDCS induced an alpha power reduction in participants with lower alpha at baseline. Conversely, Conventional tDCS induced a beta power reduction in participants with higher beta at baseline. Furthermore, data showed a trend towards a behavioural effect of HD-tDCS in participants with lower beta at baseline showing faster response times. Conventional and HD-tDCS distinctively modulated cortical activity. The study highlights the importance of considering state-dependency to determine the effects of tDCS on individuals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8027218/ /pubmed/33828202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87371-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Masina, Fabio
Arcara, Giorgio
Galletti, Eleonora
Cinque, Isabella
Gamberini, Luciano
Mapelli, Daniela
Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS
title Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS
title_full Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS
title_fullStr Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS
title_short Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tDCS
title_sort neurophysiological and behavioural effects of conventional and high definition tdcs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87371-z
work_keys_str_mv AT masinafabio neurophysiologicalandbehaviouraleffectsofconventionalandhighdefinitiontdcs
AT arcaragiorgio neurophysiologicalandbehaviouraleffectsofconventionalandhighdefinitiontdcs
AT gallettieleonora neurophysiologicalandbehaviouraleffectsofconventionalandhighdefinitiontdcs
AT cinqueisabella neurophysiologicalandbehaviouraleffectsofconventionalandhighdefinitiontdcs
AT gamberiniluciano neurophysiologicalandbehaviouraleffectsofconventionalandhighdefinitiontdcs
AT mapellidaniela neurophysiologicalandbehaviouraleffectsofconventionalandhighdefinitiontdcs