Cargando…
Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.570 |
_version_ | 1783675835692089344 |
---|---|
author | Gilmartin, Heather M. Connelly, Brigid Hebbe, Annika Battaglia, Catherine Kwan, Bethany M. |
author_facet | Gilmartin, Heather M. Connelly, Brigid Hebbe, Annika Battaglia, Catherine Kwan, Bethany M. |
author_sort | Gilmartin, Heather M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A mixed-methods RedCap survey querying the remote work experience was emailed to Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) scientists and staff in April 2020. Descriptive analyses, Fisher’s Exact tests, and content analysis were conducted. Respondents (n = 322) were primarily female (n = 240; 75%), 21–73 years old (mean = 42 years) with a PhD (n = 139; 44%) or MD (n = 56; 55%). Prior to COVID-19, 77% (n = 246) never or rarely (0–1 day a week) worked remotely. Remote work somewhat or greatly interfered with 76% (n = 244) of researchers’ programs and 71% (n = 231) reported slowing or stopping their research. Common barriers included missing interactions with colleagues (n = 198; 62%) and the absence of routines (n = 137; 43%). Strategies included videoconferencing (n = 283; 88%), altering timelines and expectations (n = 180; 56%). Scientists and staff experienced interference with their research when they shifted to remote work, causing many to slow or stop research programs. Methods to enhance communication and relationships, support productivity, and collectively cope during remote work are available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8027555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80275552021-04-08 Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado Gilmartin, Heather M. Connelly, Brigid Hebbe, Annika Battaglia, Catherine Kwan, Bethany M. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A mixed-methods RedCap survey querying the remote work experience was emailed to Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) scientists and staff in April 2020. Descriptive analyses, Fisher’s Exact tests, and content analysis were conducted. Respondents (n = 322) were primarily female (n = 240; 75%), 21–73 years old (mean = 42 years) with a PhD (n = 139; 44%) or MD (n = 56; 55%). Prior to COVID-19, 77% (n = 246) never or rarely (0–1 day a week) worked remotely. Remote work somewhat or greatly interfered with 76% (n = 244) of researchers’ programs and 71% (n = 231) reported slowing or stopping their research. Common barriers included missing interactions with colleagues (n = 198; 62%) and the absence of routines (n = 137; 43%). Strategies included videoconferencing (n = 283; 88%), altering timelines and expectations (n = 180; 56%). Scientists and staff experienced interference with their research when they shifted to remote work, causing many to slow or stop research programs. Methods to enhance communication and relationships, support productivity, and collectively cope during remote work are available. Cambridge University Press 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8027555/ /pubmed/34192046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.570 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Communications Gilmartin, Heather M. Connelly, Brigid Hebbe, Annika Battaglia, Catherine Kwan, Bethany M. Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado |
title | Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado |
title_full | Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado |
title_fullStr | Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado |
title_short | Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado |
title_sort | assessing the impact of remote work during covid-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in colorado |
topic | Special Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilmartinheatherm assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado AT connellybrigid assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado AT hebbeannika assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado AT battagliacatherine assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado AT kwanbethanym assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado |