Cargando…

Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado

The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilmartin, Heather M., Connelly, Brigid, Hebbe, Annika, Battaglia, Catherine, Kwan, Bethany M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.570
_version_ 1783675835692089344
author Gilmartin, Heather M.
Connelly, Brigid
Hebbe, Annika
Battaglia, Catherine
Kwan, Bethany M.
author_facet Gilmartin, Heather M.
Connelly, Brigid
Hebbe, Annika
Battaglia, Catherine
Kwan, Bethany M.
author_sort Gilmartin, Heather M.
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A mixed-methods RedCap survey querying the remote work experience was emailed to Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) scientists and staff in April 2020. Descriptive analyses, Fisher’s Exact tests, and content analysis were conducted. Respondents (n = 322) were primarily female (n = 240; 75%), 21–73 years old (mean = 42 years) with a PhD (n = 139; 44%) or MD (n = 56; 55%). Prior to COVID-19, 77% (n = 246) never or rarely (0–1 day a week) worked remotely. Remote work somewhat or greatly interfered with 76% (n = 244) of researchers’ programs and 71% (n = 231) reported slowing or stopping their research. Common barriers included missing interactions with colleagues (n = 198; 62%) and the absence of routines (n = 137; 43%). Strategies included videoconferencing (n = 283; 88%), altering timelines and expectations (n = 180; 56%). Scientists and staff experienced interference with their research when they shifted to remote work, causing many to slow or stop research programs. Methods to enhance communication and relationships, support productivity, and collectively cope during remote work are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80275552021-04-08 Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado Gilmartin, Heather M. Connelly, Brigid Hebbe, Annika Battaglia, Catherine Kwan, Bethany M. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A mixed-methods RedCap survey querying the remote work experience was emailed to Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) scientists and staff in April 2020. Descriptive analyses, Fisher’s Exact tests, and content analysis were conducted. Respondents (n = 322) were primarily female (n = 240; 75%), 21–73 years old (mean = 42 years) with a PhD (n = 139; 44%) or MD (n = 56; 55%). Prior to COVID-19, 77% (n = 246) never or rarely (0–1 day a week) worked remotely. Remote work somewhat or greatly interfered with 76% (n = 244) of researchers’ programs and 71% (n = 231) reported slowing or stopping their research. Common barriers included missing interactions with colleagues (n = 198; 62%) and the absence of routines (n = 137; 43%). Strategies included videoconferencing (n = 283; 88%), altering timelines and expectations (n = 180; 56%). Scientists and staff experienced interference with their research when they shifted to remote work, causing many to slow or stop research programs. Methods to enhance communication and relationships, support productivity, and collectively cope during remote work are available. Cambridge University Press 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8027555/ /pubmed/34192046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.570 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Communications
Gilmartin, Heather M.
Connelly, Brigid
Hebbe, Annika
Battaglia, Catherine
Kwan, Bethany M.
Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
title Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
title_full Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
title_short Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado
title_sort assessing the impact of remote work during covid-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in colorado
topic Special Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.570
work_keys_str_mv AT gilmartinheatherm assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado
AT connellybrigid assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado
AT hebbeannika assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado
AT battagliacatherine assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado
AT kwanbethanym assessingtheimpactofremoteworkduringcovid19onclinicalandtranslationalscientistsandstaffincolorado