Cargando…

Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus-related conspiracy theories (CT) have been found to be associated with fewer pandemic containment-focused behaviors. It is therefore important to evaluate associated cognitive factors. We aimed to obtain first endorsement rate estimates of coronavirus-related conspiracy belie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuhn, Sarah Anne Kezia, Lieb, Roselind, Freeman, Daniel, Andreou, Christina, Zander-Schellenberg, Thea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001124
_version_ 1783675836416655360
author Kuhn, Sarah Anne Kezia
Lieb, Roselind
Freeman, Daniel
Andreou, Christina
Zander-Schellenberg, Thea
author_facet Kuhn, Sarah Anne Kezia
Lieb, Roselind
Freeman, Daniel
Andreou, Christina
Zander-Schellenberg, Thea
author_sort Kuhn, Sarah Anne Kezia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronavirus-related conspiracy theories (CT) have been found to be associated with fewer pandemic containment-focused behaviors. It is therefore important to evaluate associated cognitive factors. We aimed to obtain first endorsement rate estimates of coronavirus-related conspiracy beliefs in a German-speaking general population sample and investigate whether delusion-related reasoning biases and paranoid ideation are associated with such beliefs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional non-probability online study, quota-sampled for age and gender, with 1684 adults from Germany and German-speaking Switzerland. We assessed general and specific coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, reasoning biases [jumping-to-conclusions bias (JTC), liberal acceptance bias (LA), bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE), possibility of being mistaken (PM)], and paranoid ideation, using established experimental paradigms and self-report questionnaires. RESULTS: Around 10% of our sample endorsed coronavirus-related CT beliefs at least strongly, and another 20% to some degree. Overall endorsement was similar to levels observed in a UK-based study (Freeman et al., 2020b). Higher levels of conspiracy belief endorsement were associated with greater JTC, greater LA, greater BADE, higher PM, and greater paranoid ideation. Associations were mostly small to moderate and best described by non-linear relationships. CONCLUSIONS: A noticeable proportion of our sample recruited in Germany and German-speaking Switzerland endorsed coronavirus conspiracy beliefs strongly or to some degree. These beliefs are associated with reasoning biases studied in delusion research. The non-probability sampling approach limits the generalizability of findings. Future longitudinal and experimental studies investigating conspiracy beliefs along the lines of reasoning are encouraged to validate reasoning aberrations as risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80275602021-04-08 Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia Kuhn, Sarah Anne Kezia Lieb, Roselind Freeman, Daniel Andreou, Christina Zander-Schellenberg, Thea Psychol Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronavirus-related conspiracy theories (CT) have been found to be associated with fewer pandemic containment-focused behaviors. It is therefore important to evaluate associated cognitive factors. We aimed to obtain first endorsement rate estimates of coronavirus-related conspiracy beliefs in a German-speaking general population sample and investigate whether delusion-related reasoning biases and paranoid ideation are associated with such beliefs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional non-probability online study, quota-sampled for age and gender, with 1684 adults from Germany and German-speaking Switzerland. We assessed general and specific coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, reasoning biases [jumping-to-conclusions bias (JTC), liberal acceptance bias (LA), bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE), possibility of being mistaken (PM)], and paranoid ideation, using established experimental paradigms and self-report questionnaires. RESULTS: Around 10% of our sample endorsed coronavirus-related CT beliefs at least strongly, and another 20% to some degree. Overall endorsement was similar to levels observed in a UK-based study (Freeman et al., 2020b). Higher levels of conspiracy belief endorsement were associated with greater JTC, greater LA, greater BADE, higher PM, and greater paranoid ideation. Associations were mostly small to moderate and best described by non-linear relationships. CONCLUSIONS: A noticeable proportion of our sample recruited in Germany and German-speaking Switzerland endorsed coronavirus conspiracy beliefs strongly or to some degree. These beliefs are associated with reasoning biases studied in delusion research. The non-probability sampling approach limits the generalizability of findings. Future longitudinal and experimental studies investigating conspiracy beliefs along the lines of reasoning are encouraged to validate reasoning aberrations as risk factors. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8027560/ /pubmed/33722315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001124 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kuhn, Sarah Anne Kezia
Lieb, Roselind
Freeman, Daniel
Andreou, Christina
Zander-Schellenberg, Thea
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
title Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
title_full Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
title_fullStr Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
title_full_unstemmed Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
title_short Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
title_sort coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the german-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33722315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001124
work_keys_str_mv AT kuhnsarahannekezia coronavirusconspiracybeliefsinthegermanspeakinggeneralpopulationendorsementratesandlinkstoreasoningbiasesandparanoia
AT liebroselind coronavirusconspiracybeliefsinthegermanspeakinggeneralpopulationendorsementratesandlinkstoreasoningbiasesandparanoia
AT freemandaniel coronavirusconspiracybeliefsinthegermanspeakinggeneralpopulationendorsementratesandlinkstoreasoningbiasesandparanoia
AT andreouchristina coronavirusconspiracybeliefsinthegermanspeakinggeneralpopulationendorsementratesandlinkstoreasoningbiasesandparanoia
AT zanderschellenbergthea coronavirusconspiracybeliefsinthegermanspeakinggeneralpopulationendorsementratesandlinkstoreasoningbiasesandparanoia