Cargando…

Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device

BACKGROUND: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is a non‐pharmacological therapy to facilitate airway secretion removal. There have been concerns about potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) and lead integrity problems during the use of vibrating CPT devices in patients with cardiac implantable electron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gwag, Hye Bin, Joh, Hyun Sung, Kim, June Soo, Park, Kyoung‐Min, On, Young Keun, Park, Seung‐Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23571
_version_ 1783675837811261440
author Gwag, Hye Bin
Joh, Hyun Sung
Kim, June Soo
Park, Kyoung‐Min
On, Young Keun
Park, Seung‐Jung
author_facet Gwag, Hye Bin
Joh, Hyun Sung
Kim, June Soo
Park, Kyoung‐Min
On, Young Keun
Park, Seung‐Jung
author_sort Gwag, Hye Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is a non‐pharmacological therapy to facilitate airway secretion removal. There have been concerns about potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) and lead integrity problems during the use of vibrating CPT devices in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). HYPOTHESIS: Two CPT devices can be used safely in patients with CIED. METHODS: Volunteer patients with CIED underwent device interrogation to check lead integrity and device function before and after application of CPT devices. Mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) vests were used while monitoring surface electrocardiograms and intra‐cardiac electrograms. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 46 patients with CIEDs (25 pacemakers, 15 implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators, and six cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillators). There was no noise detection or EMI during CPT in any patient. None of the patients showed clinically significant changes in lead integrity parameters. HFCWO inappropriately accelerated the pacing rate up to the maximal programmed value in five patients with pacemakers and two with cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillators. CONCLUSION: CPT may be safely applied to patients with CIED without compromising lead integrity or device function, except for unwanted increase in pacing rate caused by misdetection of chest wall vibration as patients' activity while using HFCWO. Deactivation of the accelerometer‐based activity sensor may be needed when HFCWO is planned for CPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80275692021-04-13 Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device Gwag, Hye Bin Joh, Hyun Sung Kim, June Soo Park, Kyoung‐Min On, Young Keun Park, Seung‐Jung Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is a non‐pharmacological therapy to facilitate airway secretion removal. There have been concerns about potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) and lead integrity problems during the use of vibrating CPT devices in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). HYPOTHESIS: Two CPT devices can be used safely in patients with CIED. METHODS: Volunteer patients with CIED underwent device interrogation to check lead integrity and device function before and after application of CPT devices. Mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) vests were used while monitoring surface electrocardiograms and intra‐cardiac electrograms. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 46 patients with CIEDs (25 pacemakers, 15 implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators, and six cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillators). There was no noise detection or EMI during CPT in any patient. None of the patients showed clinically significant changes in lead integrity parameters. HFCWO inappropriately accelerated the pacing rate up to the maximal programmed value in five patients with pacemakers and two with cardiac resynchronization therapy‐defibrillators. CONCLUSION: CPT may be safely applied to patients with CIED without compromising lead integrity or device function, except for unwanted increase in pacing rate caused by misdetection of chest wall vibration as patients' activity while using HFCWO. Deactivation of the accelerometer‐based activity sensor may be needed when HFCWO is planned for CPT. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8027569/ /pubmed/33590902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23571 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Gwag, Hye Bin
Joh, Hyun Sung
Kim, June Soo
Park, Kyoung‐Min
On, Young Keun
Park, Seung‐Jung
Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
title Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
title_full Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
title_fullStr Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
title_full_unstemmed Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
title_short Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
title_sort safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high‐frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23571
work_keys_str_mv AT gwaghyebin safetyofmechanicallungvibratorandhighfrequencychestwalloscillationinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevice
AT johhyunsung safetyofmechanicallungvibratorandhighfrequencychestwalloscillationinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevice
AT kimjunesoo safetyofmechanicallungvibratorandhighfrequencychestwalloscillationinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevice
AT parkkyoungmin safetyofmechanicallungvibratorandhighfrequencychestwalloscillationinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevice
AT onyoungkeun safetyofmechanicallungvibratorandhighfrequencychestwalloscillationinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevice
AT parkseungjung safetyofmechanicallungvibratorandhighfrequencychestwalloscillationinpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevice