Cargando…

Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhongxiu, Wang, Duolao, Ma, Min, Li, Chen, Wan, Zhi, Zhang, Li, Zhu, Ye, Wang, Mian, Wang, Hua, He, Sen, Peng, Yong, Wei, Jiafu, Huang, Baotao, He, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23582
_version_ 1783675840909803520
author Chen, Zhongxiu
Wang, Duolao
Ma, Min
Li, Chen
Wan, Zhi
Zhang, Li
Zhu, Ye
Wang, Mian
Wang, Hua
He, Sen
Peng, Yong
Wei, Jiafu
Huang, Baotao
He, Yong
author_facet Chen, Zhongxiu
Wang, Duolao
Ma, Min
Li, Chen
Wan, Zhi
Zhang, Li
Zhu, Ye
Wang, Mian
Wang, Hua
He, Sen
Peng, Yong
Wei, Jiafu
Huang, Baotao
He, Yong
author_sort Chen, Zhongxiu
collection PubMed
description Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STEMI when timely PPCI is not feasible. However, pharmacoinvasive strategy has potential delay between clinical patency and complete myocardial perfusion. The optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients with anticipated PPCI delay according to current practice is uncertain. OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, superiority trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes. A total of 632 STEMI patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset and with an expected time of first medical contact to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≥120 minute will be randomized to a reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy (reduced‐dose fibrinolysis combined with simultaneous transfer for immediate invasive therapy with a time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI < 3 hours) or to standard pharmacoinvasive treatment. The primary endpoint is the composite of death, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock at 30‐days. Enrollment of the first patient is planned in March 2021. The recruitment is anticipated to last for 12 to 18 months and to complete in September 2023 with 1 year follow‐up. The OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial will help determine whether reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy improves clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI and anticipated PPCI delay. This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04752345).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80275832021-04-13 Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction Chen, Zhongxiu Wang, Duolao Ma, Min Li, Chen Wan, Zhi Zhang, Li Zhu, Ye Wang, Mian Wang, Hua He, Sen Peng, Yong Wei, Jiafu Huang, Baotao He, Yong Clin Cardiol Trial Designs Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STEMI when timely PPCI is not feasible. However, pharmacoinvasive strategy has potential delay between clinical patency and complete myocardial perfusion. The optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients with anticipated PPCI delay according to current practice is uncertain. OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, superiority trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes. A total of 632 STEMI patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset and with an expected time of first medical contact to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≥120 minute will be randomized to a reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy (reduced‐dose fibrinolysis combined with simultaneous transfer for immediate invasive therapy with a time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI < 3 hours) or to standard pharmacoinvasive treatment. The primary endpoint is the composite of death, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock at 30‐days. Enrollment of the first patient is planned in March 2021. The recruitment is anticipated to last for 12 to 18 months and to complete in September 2023 with 1 year follow‐up. The OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial will help determine whether reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy improves clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI and anticipated PPCI delay. This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04752345). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8027583/ /pubmed/33634478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23582 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Trial Designs
Chen, Zhongxiu
Wang, Duolao
Ma, Min
Li, Chen
Wan, Zhi
Zhang, Li
Zhu, Ye
Wang, Mian
Wang, Hua
He, Sen
Peng, Yong
Wei, Jiafu
Huang, Baotao
He, Yong
Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
title Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_short Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort rationale and design of the optimal‐reperfusion trial: a prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
topic Trial Designs
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23582
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhongxiu rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wangduolao rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mamin rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT lichen rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wanzhi rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT zhangli rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT zhuye rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wangmian rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT wanghua rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT hesen rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT pengyong rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT weijiafu rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT huangbaotao rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT heyong rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction