Cargando…
Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23582 |
_version_ | 1783675840909803520 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Zhongxiu Wang, Duolao Ma, Min Li, Chen Wan, Zhi Zhang, Li Zhu, Ye Wang, Mian Wang, Hua He, Sen Peng, Yong Wei, Jiafu Huang, Baotao He, Yong |
author_facet | Chen, Zhongxiu Wang, Duolao Ma, Min Li, Chen Wan, Zhi Zhang, Li Zhu, Ye Wang, Mian Wang, Hua He, Sen Peng, Yong Wei, Jiafu Huang, Baotao He, Yong |
author_sort | Chen, Zhongxiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STEMI when timely PPCI is not feasible. However, pharmacoinvasive strategy has potential delay between clinical patency and complete myocardial perfusion. The optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients with anticipated PPCI delay according to current practice is uncertain. OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, superiority trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes. A total of 632 STEMI patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset and with an expected time of first medical contact to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≥120 minute will be randomized to a reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy (reduced‐dose fibrinolysis combined with simultaneous transfer for immediate invasive therapy with a time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI < 3 hours) or to standard pharmacoinvasive treatment. The primary endpoint is the composite of death, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock at 30‐days. Enrollment of the first patient is planned in March 2021. The recruitment is anticipated to last for 12 to 18 months and to complete in September 2023 with 1 year follow‐up. The OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial will help determine whether reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy improves clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI and anticipated PPCI delay. This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04752345). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8027583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80275832021-04-13 Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction Chen, Zhongxiu Wang, Duolao Ma, Min Li, Chen Wan, Zhi Zhang, Li Zhu, Ye Wang, Mian Wang, Hua He, Sen Peng, Yong Wei, Jiafu Huang, Baotao He, Yong Clin Cardiol Trial Designs Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STEMI when timely PPCI is not feasible. However, pharmacoinvasive strategy has potential delay between clinical patency and complete myocardial perfusion. The optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients with anticipated PPCI delay according to current practice is uncertain. OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, superiority trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes. A total of 632 STEMI patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset and with an expected time of first medical contact to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≥120 minute will be randomized to a reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy (reduced‐dose fibrinolysis combined with simultaneous transfer for immediate invasive therapy with a time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI < 3 hours) or to standard pharmacoinvasive treatment. The primary endpoint is the composite of death, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock at 30‐days. Enrollment of the first patient is planned in March 2021. The recruitment is anticipated to last for 12 to 18 months and to complete in September 2023 with 1 year follow‐up. The OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial will help determine whether reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy improves clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI and anticipated PPCI delay. This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04752345). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8027583/ /pubmed/33634478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23582 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Trial Designs Chen, Zhongxiu Wang, Duolao Ma, Min Li, Chen Wan, Zhi Zhang, Li Zhu, Ye Wang, Mian Wang, Hua He, Sen Peng, Yong Wei, Jiafu Huang, Baotao He, Yong Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title | Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_full | Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_short | Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
title_sort | rationale and design of the optimal‐reperfusion trial: a prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute st‐segment elevation myocardial infarction |
topic | Trial Designs |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenzhongxiu rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wangduolao rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT mamin rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT lichen rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wanzhi rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT zhangli rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT zhuye rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wangmian rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT wanghua rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT hesen rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT pengyong rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT weijiafu rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT huangbaotao rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT heyong rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction AT rationaleanddesignoftheoptimalreperfusiontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentfibrinolysistransferpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionstrategiesinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction |