Cargando…
Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy
PURPOSE: To categorize visual field (VF) defects according to Freitag and Tanking’s (FT) classification in Thyroid Eye Disease-Compressive Optic Neuropathy (TED-CON) and evaluate the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of the classification. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this retrospect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01504-2 |
_version_ | 1783675858089672704 |
---|---|
author | Garip Kuebler, Aylin Halfter, Kathrin Reznicek, Lukas Klingenstein, Annemarie Priglinger, Siegfried Hintschich, Christoph |
author_facet | Garip Kuebler, Aylin Halfter, Kathrin Reznicek, Lukas Klingenstein, Annemarie Priglinger, Siegfried Hintschich, Christoph |
author_sort | Garip Kuebler, Aylin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To categorize visual field (VF) defects according to Freitag and Tanking’s (FT) classification in Thyroid Eye Disease-Compressive Optic Neuropathy (TED-CON) and evaluate the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of the classification. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study we included medical reports of 96 eyes (51 patients), who underwent VF testing with TED-CON in Ludwig-Maximilians-University (2008–2019). Two readers separately examined the VFs at the time of the TED-CON diagnosis, each offering two readings of the same VF in a time interval of 1 month. None of our patients were diagnosed with only VF testing. The visual field testing was only performed when the inclusion criteria for TED-CON were met. RESULTS: The most common VF defects upon TED-CON diagnosis were stage 1b defects in FT classification (34.4% for reader 1, 35.4% for reader 2), followed by stage 2b (10.4% for reader 1, 14.6% for reader 2), and stage 3 (10.4% for both readers). The overall interreader agreement between 2 examiners was substantial for the first reading (69.8% agreement, kappa 0.635 (95% CI [0.525–0.745])) and moderate for the second reading (66.7% agreement, kappa 0.598 (95% CI [0.488–0.708])). The intrareader reproducibility ranged from substantial to almost perfect (78.1% agreement) between readings (kappa 0.736 (95%CI [0.638–0.834])) for reader 1 and 90.6% agreement (kappa 0.885 (95%CI [0.814–0.956])) for reader 2. CONCLUSION: We found good BCVA (LogMAR ≤ 0.2), in nearly half of the cases (44 eyes, 45.8%) and also, strikingly near perfect visual acuity (BCVA LogMAR ≤0.1) in 22.9% of the cases (22 eyes) with TED-CON. We conclude that clinicians should be alert to VF defects in the inferior region (stage 1a/1b in the FT classification) even in patients with a good BCVA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8027704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80277042021-04-08 Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy Garip Kuebler, Aylin Halfter, Kathrin Reznicek, Lukas Klingenstein, Annemarie Priglinger, Siegfried Hintschich, Christoph Eye (Lond) Article PURPOSE: To categorize visual field (VF) defects according to Freitag and Tanking’s (FT) classification in Thyroid Eye Disease-Compressive Optic Neuropathy (TED-CON) and evaluate the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of the classification. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study we included medical reports of 96 eyes (51 patients), who underwent VF testing with TED-CON in Ludwig-Maximilians-University (2008–2019). Two readers separately examined the VFs at the time of the TED-CON diagnosis, each offering two readings of the same VF in a time interval of 1 month. None of our patients were diagnosed with only VF testing. The visual field testing was only performed when the inclusion criteria for TED-CON were met. RESULTS: The most common VF defects upon TED-CON diagnosis were stage 1b defects in FT classification (34.4% for reader 1, 35.4% for reader 2), followed by stage 2b (10.4% for reader 1, 14.6% for reader 2), and stage 3 (10.4% for both readers). The overall interreader agreement between 2 examiners was substantial for the first reading (69.8% agreement, kappa 0.635 (95% CI [0.525–0.745])) and moderate for the second reading (66.7% agreement, kappa 0.598 (95% CI [0.488–0.708])). The intrareader reproducibility ranged from substantial to almost perfect (78.1% agreement) between readings (kappa 0.736 (95%CI [0.638–0.834])) for reader 1 and 90.6% agreement (kappa 0.885 (95%CI [0.814–0.956])) for reader 2. CONCLUSION: We found good BCVA (LogMAR ≤ 0.2), in nearly half of the cases (44 eyes, 45.8%) and also, strikingly near perfect visual acuity (BCVA LogMAR ≤0.1) in 22.9% of the cases (22 eyes) with TED-CON. We conclude that clinicians should be alert to VF defects in the inferior region (stage 1a/1b in the FT classification) even in patients with a good BCVA. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-08 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8027704/ /pubmed/33833417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01504-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Garip Kuebler, Aylin Halfter, Kathrin Reznicek, Lukas Klingenstein, Annemarie Priglinger, Siegfried Hintschich, Christoph Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
title | Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
title_full | Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
title_short | Evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of Visual Field Defects in Thyroid Eye Disease– Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
title_sort | evaluating the interreader agreement and intrareader reproducibility of visual field defects in thyroid eye disease– compressive optic neuropathy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01504-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garipkuebleraylin evaluatingtheinterreaderagreementandintrareaderreproducibilityofvisualfielddefectsinthyroideyediseasecompressiveopticneuropathy AT halfterkathrin evaluatingtheinterreaderagreementandintrareaderreproducibilityofvisualfielddefectsinthyroideyediseasecompressiveopticneuropathy AT rezniceklukas evaluatingtheinterreaderagreementandintrareaderreproducibilityofvisualfielddefectsinthyroideyediseasecompressiveopticneuropathy AT klingensteinannemarie evaluatingtheinterreaderagreementandintrareaderreproducibilityofvisualfielddefectsinthyroideyediseasecompressiveopticneuropathy AT priglingersiegfried evaluatingtheinterreaderagreementandintrareaderreproducibilityofvisualfielddefectsinthyroideyediseasecompressiveopticneuropathy AT hintschichchristoph evaluatingtheinterreaderagreementandintrareaderreproducibilityofvisualfielddefectsinthyroideyediseasecompressiveopticneuropathy |