Cargando…

Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics

Background: Although graduated autonomy is an essential component of residency training, we have an incomplete understanding of resident and attending faculty perceptions of autonomy. Objective: In this study, we assessed differences in perceived autonomy among residents and faculty in pediatrics, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mieczkowski, Alexandra E, Gonzaga, Alda Maria R, Kraemer, Kevin, Habicht, Robert, Friedland, Allen R, Rubio, Doris, Van Deusen, Reed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842175
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13805
_version_ 1783675893642690560
author Mieczkowski, Alexandra E
Gonzaga, Alda Maria R
Kraemer, Kevin
Habicht, Robert
Friedland, Allen R
Rubio, Doris
Van Deusen, Reed
author_facet Mieczkowski, Alexandra E
Gonzaga, Alda Maria R
Kraemer, Kevin
Habicht, Robert
Friedland, Allen R
Rubio, Doris
Van Deusen, Reed
author_sort Mieczkowski, Alexandra E
collection PubMed
description Background: Although graduated autonomy is an essential component of residency training, we have an incomplete understanding of resident and attending faculty perceptions of autonomy. Objective: In this study, we assessed differences in perceived autonomy among residents and faculty in pediatrics, internal medicine, and combined internal medicine-pediatrics. Methods: We surveyed senior-level (PGY-2-5) residents and faculty in pediatrics, internal medicine, and combined internal medicine-pediatrics in three large, urban training centers in November 2014. The survey included domain items such as general perceptions of autonomy, case management, rounding structure, and individual resident and faculty factors that may interplay with the granting or receiving of autonomy. Results: Of 489 eligible respondents, 215 (44%) responded. Internal medicine-pediatrics residents were more likely than categorical pediatrics residents and pediatrics faculty to disagree that they received an appropriate level of autonomy while on inpatient pediatrics general wards (mean = 2.7 relative to 4.0 and 4.3, categorical residents and faculty; 5-point Likert scale; P < .001). On a 5-point Likert scale, the internal medicine-pediatrics residents were more likely to agree that they received too much oversight on pediatrics general ward rotations (mean, 3.9) compared to internal medicine general ward rotations (mean, 1.9) with a P-value between rotations of <.001. Combined internal medicine-pediatrics perceptions of too much oversight while on pediatric general ward rotations were significantly different from their categorical pediatrics peers (pediatrics mean 2.0, P < .001). Conclusions: Internal medicine-pediatrics residents have differing perceptions of autonomy from their categorical peers as well as categorical supervising faculty. Combined Internal medicine-pediatrics residents' perceived oversight on pediatrics rotations differently from their categorical pediatrics peers and also differently from their experiences on internal medicine wards. A better understanding of combined internal medicine-pediatrics residents' perceptions of autonomy and supervision can help inform future work regarding autonomy-supportive strategies to optimize learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8027953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80279532021-04-09 Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Mieczkowski, Alexandra E Gonzaga, Alda Maria R Kraemer, Kevin Habicht, Robert Friedland, Allen R Rubio, Doris Van Deusen, Reed Cureus Internal Medicine Background: Although graduated autonomy is an essential component of residency training, we have an incomplete understanding of resident and attending faculty perceptions of autonomy. Objective: In this study, we assessed differences in perceived autonomy among residents and faculty in pediatrics, internal medicine, and combined internal medicine-pediatrics. Methods: We surveyed senior-level (PGY-2-5) residents and faculty in pediatrics, internal medicine, and combined internal medicine-pediatrics in three large, urban training centers in November 2014. The survey included domain items such as general perceptions of autonomy, case management, rounding structure, and individual resident and faculty factors that may interplay with the granting or receiving of autonomy. Results: Of 489 eligible respondents, 215 (44%) responded. Internal medicine-pediatrics residents were more likely than categorical pediatrics residents and pediatrics faculty to disagree that they received an appropriate level of autonomy while on inpatient pediatrics general wards (mean = 2.7 relative to 4.0 and 4.3, categorical residents and faculty; 5-point Likert scale; P < .001). On a 5-point Likert scale, the internal medicine-pediatrics residents were more likely to agree that they received too much oversight on pediatrics general ward rotations (mean, 3.9) compared to internal medicine general ward rotations (mean, 1.9) with a P-value between rotations of <.001. Combined internal medicine-pediatrics perceptions of too much oversight while on pediatric general ward rotations were significantly different from their categorical pediatrics peers (pediatrics mean 2.0, P < .001). Conclusions: Internal medicine-pediatrics residents have differing perceptions of autonomy from their categorical peers as well as categorical supervising faculty. Combined Internal medicine-pediatrics residents' perceived oversight on pediatrics rotations differently from their categorical pediatrics peers and also differently from their experiences on internal medicine wards. A better understanding of combined internal medicine-pediatrics residents' perceptions of autonomy and supervision can help inform future work regarding autonomy-supportive strategies to optimize learning. Cureus 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8027953/ /pubmed/33842175 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13805 Text en Copyright © 2021, Mieczkowski et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Mieczkowski, Alexandra E
Gonzaga, Alda Maria R
Kraemer, Kevin
Habicht, Robert
Friedland, Allen R
Rubio, Doris
Van Deusen, Reed
Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics
title Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics
title_full Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics
title_fullStr Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics
title_short Perceptions of Resident Autonomy in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Internal Medicine-Pediatrics
title_sort perceptions of resident autonomy in internal medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine-pediatrics
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842175
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13805
work_keys_str_mv AT mieczkowskialexandrae perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics
AT gonzagaaldamariar perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics
AT kraemerkevin perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics
AT habichtrobert perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics
AT friedlandallenr perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics
AT rubiodoris perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics
AT vandeusenreed perceptionsofresidentautonomyininternalmedicinepediatricsandinternalmedicinepediatrics