Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy of the upper extremity. The previous systematic review of the diagnostic tests for CTS was outdated. The objective of this study was to compile and appraise the evidence on the accuracy of sensory and motor tests u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dabbagh, Armaghan, MacDermid, Joy C., Yong, Joshua, Packham, Tara L., Macedo, Luciana G., Ghodrati, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04202-y
_version_ 1783675930886012928
author Dabbagh, Armaghan
MacDermid, Joy C.
Yong, Joshua
Packham, Tara L.
Macedo, Luciana G.
Ghodrati, Maryam
author_facet Dabbagh, Armaghan
MacDermid, Joy C.
Yong, Joshua
Packham, Tara L.
Macedo, Luciana G.
Ghodrati, Maryam
author_sort Dabbagh, Armaghan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy of the upper extremity. The previous systematic review of the diagnostic tests for CTS was outdated. The objective of this study was to compile and appraise the evidence on the accuracy of sensory and motor tests used for the diagnosis of CTS. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched on January 20, 2020. Studies assessing at least one diagnostic accuracy property of the sensory or motor tests for CTS diagnosis were selected by two independent reviewers. Diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA guidelines was followed. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were rated using QUADAS-2 tool. Any reported diagnostic accuracy property was summarized. Study characteristics and any information on the accuracy of the sensory and motor tests for CTS diagnosis were extracted. RESULTS: We included sixteen clinical studies, assessing thirteen different sensory or motor tests. The most sensitive test for CTS diagnosis was the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (with 3.22 in any radial digit as the normal threshold) with sensitivity from 0.49 to 0.96. The tests with the highest specificity (Sp) were palmar grip strength (Sp = 0.94), pinch grip strength (Sp from 0.78 to 0.95), thenar atrophy (Sp from 0.96 to 1.00), and two-point discrimination (Sp from 0.81 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence was inconclusive on which sensory or motor test for CTS diagnosis had the highest diagnostic accuracy. The results suggest that clinicians should not use a single sensory or motor test when deciding on CTS diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018109031, on 20 December 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8028143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80281432021-04-08 Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review Dabbagh, Armaghan MacDermid, Joy C. Yong, Joshua Packham, Tara L. Macedo, Luciana G. Ghodrati, Maryam BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy of the upper extremity. The previous systematic review of the diagnostic tests for CTS was outdated. The objective of this study was to compile and appraise the evidence on the accuracy of sensory and motor tests used for the diagnosis of CTS. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched on January 20, 2020. Studies assessing at least one diagnostic accuracy property of the sensory or motor tests for CTS diagnosis were selected by two independent reviewers. Diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA guidelines was followed. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were rated using QUADAS-2 tool. Any reported diagnostic accuracy property was summarized. Study characteristics and any information on the accuracy of the sensory and motor tests for CTS diagnosis were extracted. RESULTS: We included sixteen clinical studies, assessing thirteen different sensory or motor tests. The most sensitive test for CTS diagnosis was the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (with 3.22 in any radial digit as the normal threshold) with sensitivity from 0.49 to 0.96. The tests with the highest specificity (Sp) were palmar grip strength (Sp = 0.94), pinch grip strength (Sp from 0.78 to 0.95), thenar atrophy (Sp from 0.96 to 1.00), and two-point discrimination (Sp from 0.81 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence was inconclusive on which sensory or motor test for CTS diagnosis had the highest diagnostic accuracy. The results suggest that clinicians should not use a single sensory or motor test when deciding on CTS diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018109031, on 20 December 2018. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8028143/ /pubmed/33827512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04202-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dabbagh, Armaghan
MacDermid, Joy C.
Yong, Joshua
Packham, Tara L.
Macedo, Luciana G.
Ghodrati, Maryam
Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
title Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04202-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dabbagharmaghan diagnosticaccuracyofsensoryandmotortestsforthediagnosisofcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT macdermidjoyc diagnosticaccuracyofsensoryandmotortestsforthediagnosisofcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT yongjoshua diagnosticaccuracyofsensoryandmotortestsforthediagnosisofcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT packhamtaral diagnosticaccuracyofsensoryandmotortestsforthediagnosisofcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT macedolucianag diagnosticaccuracyofsensoryandmotortestsforthediagnosisofcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT ghodratimaryam diagnosticaccuracyofsensoryandmotortestsforthediagnosisofcarpaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview