Cargando…
The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review
Research methods play an imperative role in research quality as well as educating young researchers, however, the application thereof is unclear which can be detrimental to the field of psychology. Therefore, this systematised review aimed to determine what research methods are being used, how these...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00001 |
_version_ | 1783675965902159872 |
---|---|
author | Scholtz, Salomé Elizabeth de Klerk, Werner de Beer, Leon T. |
author_facet | Scholtz, Salomé Elizabeth de Klerk, Werner de Beer, Leon T. |
author_sort | Scholtz, Salomé Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research methods play an imperative role in research quality as well as educating young researchers, however, the application thereof is unclear which can be detrimental to the field of psychology. Therefore, this systematised review aimed to determine what research methods are being used, how these methods are being used and for what topics in the field. Our review of 999 articles from five journals over a period of 5 years indicated that psychology research is conducted in 10 topics via predominantly quantitative research methods. Of these 10 topics, social psychology was the most popular. The remainder of the conducted methodology is described. It was also found that articles lacked rigour and transparency in the used methodology which has implications for replicability. In conclusion this article, provides an overview of all reported methodologies used in a sample of psychology journals. It highlights the popularity and application of methods and designs throughout the article sample as well as an unexpected lack of rigour with regard to most aspects of methodology. Possible sample bias should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. It is recommended that future research should utilise the results of this study to determine the possible impact on the field of psychology as a science and to further investigation into the use of research methods. Results should prompt the following future research into: a lack or rigour and its implication on replication, the use of certain methods above others, publication bias and choice of sampling method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8028395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80283952021-04-15 The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review Scholtz, Salomé Elizabeth de Klerk, Werner de Beer, Leon T. Front Res Metr Anal Research Metrics and Analytics Research methods play an imperative role in research quality as well as educating young researchers, however, the application thereof is unclear which can be detrimental to the field of psychology. Therefore, this systematised review aimed to determine what research methods are being used, how these methods are being used and for what topics in the field. Our review of 999 articles from five journals over a period of 5 years indicated that psychology research is conducted in 10 topics via predominantly quantitative research methods. Of these 10 topics, social psychology was the most popular. The remainder of the conducted methodology is described. It was also found that articles lacked rigour and transparency in the used methodology which has implications for replicability. In conclusion this article, provides an overview of all reported methodologies used in a sample of psychology journals. It highlights the popularity and application of methods and designs throughout the article sample as well as an unexpected lack of rigour with regard to most aspects of methodology. Possible sample bias should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. It is recommended that future research should utilise the results of this study to determine the possible impact on the field of psychology as a science and to further investigation into the use of research methods. Results should prompt the following future research into: a lack or rigour and its implication on replication, the use of certain methods above others, publication bias and choice of sampling method. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8028395/ /pubmed/33870039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00001 Text en Copyright © 2020 Scholtz, de Klerk and de Beer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Metrics and Analytics Scholtz, Salomé Elizabeth de Klerk, Werner de Beer, Leon T. The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review |
title | The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review |
title_full | The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review |
title_fullStr | The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review |
title_short | The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review |
title_sort | use of research methods in psychological research: a systematised review |
topic | Research Metrics and Analytics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scholtzsalomeelizabeth theuseofresearchmethodsinpsychologicalresearchasystematisedreview AT deklerkwerner theuseofresearchmethodsinpsychologicalresearchasystematisedreview AT debeerleont theuseofresearchmethodsinpsychologicalresearchasystematisedreview AT scholtzsalomeelizabeth useofresearchmethodsinpsychologicalresearchasystematisedreview AT deklerkwerner useofresearchmethodsinpsychologicalresearchasystematisedreview AT debeerleont useofresearchmethodsinpsychologicalresearchasystematisedreview |