Cargando…
The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8 |
_version_ | 1783675999534186496 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Qianwen Xu, Baolin Wu, Huanwen You, Yan Wu, Ming Li, Lei |
author_facet | Dai, Qianwen Xu, Baolin Wu, Huanwen You, Yan Wu, Ming Li, Lei |
author_sort | Dai, Qianwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2–30.8) and 75.0% (68.0–82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5–13.1, 1.3–7.3, and 0.1–0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–1.0 and 0.1–1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse. CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8028754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80287542021-04-08 The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study Dai, Qianwen Xu, Baolin Wu, Huanwen You, Yan Wu, Ming Li, Lei Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2–30.8) and 75.0% (68.0–82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5–13.1, 1.3–7.3, and 0.1–0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–1.0 and 0.1–1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse. CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8028754/ /pubmed/33827628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dai, Qianwen Xu, Baolin Wu, Huanwen You, Yan Wu, Ming Li, Lei The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
title | The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daiqianwen theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT xubaolin theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wuhuanwen theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT youyan theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wuming theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lilei theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT daiqianwen prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT xubaolin prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wuhuanwen prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT youyan prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wuming prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lilei prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy |