Cargando…

The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Qianwen, Xu, Baolin, Wu, Huanwen, You, Yan, Wu, Ming, Li, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8
_version_ 1783675999534186496
author Dai, Qianwen
Xu, Baolin
Wu, Huanwen
You, Yan
Wu, Ming
Li, Lei
author_facet Dai, Qianwen
Xu, Baolin
Wu, Huanwen
You, Yan
Wu, Ming
Li, Lei
author_sort Dai, Qianwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2–30.8) and 75.0% (68.0–82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5–13.1, 1.3–7.3, and 0.1–0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–1.0 and 0.1–1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse. CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8028754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80287542021-04-08 The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study Dai, Qianwen Xu, Baolin Wu, Huanwen You, Yan Wu, Ming Li, Lei Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS. METHODS: Patients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2–30.8) and 75.0% (68.0–82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5–13.1, 1.3–7.3, and 0.1–0.7; and p = 0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–1.0 and 0.1–1.0, p = 0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse. CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8028754/ /pubmed/33827628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dai, Qianwen
Xu, Baolin
Wu, Huanwen
You, Yan
Wu, Ming
Li, Lei
The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
title The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
title_full The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
title_short The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8
work_keys_str_mv AT daiqianwen theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xubaolin theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuhuanwen theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT youyan theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuming theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lilei theprognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT daiqianwen prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xubaolin prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuhuanwen prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT youyan prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuming prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lilei prognosisofrecurrentlowgradeendometrialstromalsarcomaaretrospectivecohortstudy