Cargando…

Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience

BACKGROUND: Patient experience is recognised as a quality of care indicator and increasingly health services are working on achieving set targets and improving their performance. Interventions at the point of care targeting communication with patients, patient engagement in care processes and discha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Eunice, Mavondo, Felix, Horvat, Lidia, McKinlay, Louise, Fisher, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06336-0
_version_ 1783676003748413440
author Wong, Eunice
Mavondo, Felix
Horvat, Lidia
McKinlay, Louise
Fisher, Jane
author_facet Wong, Eunice
Mavondo, Felix
Horvat, Lidia
McKinlay, Louise
Fisher, Jane
author_sort Wong, Eunice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient experience is recognised as a quality of care indicator and increasingly health services are working on achieving set targets and improving their performance. Interventions at the point of care targeting communication with patients, patient engagement in care processes and discharge planning are associated with better patient experience. However, their efficacy and application to different contexts are still unclear. The aims were to describe the interventions implemented by health services to improve patient experience, their impact on overall patient experiences and specific experiences in areas of communication, discharge planning, patient education on treatment/tests, the physical environment and access to care. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of the Victorian Healthcare Experience inpatient surveys reported in September 2016 and 2018 and content analysis of interventions published in the Victorian Quality Account for 2017 from 59 public health services in Victoria, Australia. The interventions were categorised using an adapted taxonomy of professional interventions by the Cochrane EPOC Review Group. Univariate tests and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to test measure invariance across the 2016 and 2018 groups and examine the association between each of the intervention categories on overall patient experience measure and specific outcome measures. RESULTS: This study found that the overall patient experience was consistent (93%) between 2016 and 2018 samples. In comparing impact, a single intervention rather than none or multiple interventions in communication, respect and dignity and treatment and disease education areas were associated with a higher level of the overall patient experience. Interventions in waiting time, access to service, care continuity and emotional support categories were associated with a decrease in overall patient experience. CONCLUSION: This study found that to improve the overall patient experience, more focus is needed on evidence-based interventions in dignity and respect and emotional support. Furthermore, the choice of interventions should be guided by evidence of their efficacy and prioritising implementing one intervention well, provides more gains. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06336-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8028773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80287732021-04-08 Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience Wong, Eunice Mavondo, Felix Horvat, Lidia McKinlay, Louise Fisher, Jane BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient experience is recognised as a quality of care indicator and increasingly health services are working on achieving set targets and improving their performance. Interventions at the point of care targeting communication with patients, patient engagement in care processes and discharge planning are associated with better patient experience. However, their efficacy and application to different contexts are still unclear. The aims were to describe the interventions implemented by health services to improve patient experience, their impact on overall patient experiences and specific experiences in areas of communication, discharge planning, patient education on treatment/tests, the physical environment and access to care. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of the Victorian Healthcare Experience inpatient surveys reported in September 2016 and 2018 and content analysis of interventions published in the Victorian Quality Account for 2017 from 59 public health services in Victoria, Australia. The interventions were categorised using an adapted taxonomy of professional interventions by the Cochrane EPOC Review Group. Univariate tests and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to test measure invariance across the 2016 and 2018 groups and examine the association between each of the intervention categories on overall patient experience measure and specific outcome measures. RESULTS: This study found that the overall patient experience was consistent (93%) between 2016 and 2018 samples. In comparing impact, a single intervention rather than none or multiple interventions in communication, respect and dignity and treatment and disease education areas were associated with a higher level of the overall patient experience. Interventions in waiting time, access to service, care continuity and emotional support categories were associated with a decrease in overall patient experience. CONCLUSION: This study found that to improve the overall patient experience, more focus is needed on evidence-based interventions in dignity and respect and emotional support. Furthermore, the choice of interventions should be guided by evidence of their efficacy and prioritising implementing one intervention well, provides more gains. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06336-0. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8028773/ /pubmed/33827563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06336-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wong, Eunice
Mavondo, Felix
Horvat, Lidia
McKinlay, Louise
Fisher, Jane
Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
title Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
title_full Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
title_fullStr Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
title_full_unstemmed Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
title_short Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
title_sort victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06336-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wongeunice victorianhealthcareexperiencesurvey20162018evaluationofinterventionstoimprovethepatientexperience
AT mavondofelix victorianhealthcareexperiencesurvey20162018evaluationofinterventionstoimprovethepatientexperience
AT horvatlidia victorianhealthcareexperiencesurvey20162018evaluationofinterventionstoimprovethepatientexperience
AT mckinlaylouise victorianhealthcareexperiencesurvey20162018evaluationofinterventionstoimprovethepatientexperience
AT fisherjane victorianhealthcareexperiencesurvey20162018evaluationofinterventionstoimprovethepatientexperience