Cargando…

Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Stroke incidence is reportedly increasing in younger populations, although the reasons for this are not clear. We explored possible reasons by quantifying trends in neurologically focused emergency department (ED) visits, classification of stroke vs. TIA, and imaging use. METHODS: We per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appukutty, Abhinav J., Skolarus, Lesli E., Springer, Mellanie V., Meurer, William J., Burke, James F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02172-1
_version_ 1783676010475028480
author Appukutty, Abhinav J.
Skolarus, Lesli E.
Springer, Mellanie V.
Meurer, William J.
Burke, James F.
author_facet Appukutty, Abhinav J.
Skolarus, Lesli E.
Springer, Mellanie V.
Meurer, William J.
Burke, James F.
author_sort Appukutty, Abhinav J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stroke incidence is reportedly increasing in younger populations, although the reasons for this are not clear. We explored possible reasons by quantifying trends in neurologically focused emergency department (ED) visits, classification of stroke vs. TIA, and imaging use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, serial, cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine time trends in age-stratified primary reasons for visit, stroke/TIA diagnoses, and MRI utilization from 1995 to 2000 and 2005–2015. RESULTS: Five million eight hundred thousand ED visits with a primary diagnosis of stroke (CI 5.3 M–6.4 M) were represented in the data. The incidence of neurologically focused reason for visits (Neuro RFVs) increased over time in both the young and in older adults (young: + 111 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 94 − + 130; older adults: + 70 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 34 − + 108). The proportion of combined stroke and TIA diagnoses decreased over time amongst older adults with a Neuro RFV (OR 0.95 per year, p < 0.01, CI 0.94–0.96) but did not change in the young (OR 1.00 per year, p = 0.88, CI 0.95–1.04). Within the stroke/TIA population, no changes in the proportion of stroke or TIA were identified. MRI utilization rates amongst patients with a Neuro RFV increased for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found, but did not anticipate, increased incidence of neurologically focused ED visits in both age groups. Given the lower pre-test probability of a stroke in younger adults, this suggests that false positive stroke diagnoses may be increasing and may be increasing more rapidly in the young than in older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02172-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8028807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80288072021-04-09 Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study Appukutty, Abhinav J. Skolarus, Lesli E. Springer, Mellanie V. Meurer, William J. Burke, James F. BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Stroke incidence is reportedly increasing in younger populations, although the reasons for this are not clear. We explored possible reasons by quantifying trends in neurologically focused emergency department (ED) visits, classification of stroke vs. TIA, and imaging use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, serial, cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine time trends in age-stratified primary reasons for visit, stroke/TIA diagnoses, and MRI utilization from 1995 to 2000 and 2005–2015. RESULTS: Five million eight hundred thousand ED visits with a primary diagnosis of stroke (CI 5.3 M–6.4 M) were represented in the data. The incidence of neurologically focused reason for visits (Neuro RFVs) increased over time in both the young and in older adults (young: + 111 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 94 − + 130; older adults: + 70 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 34 − + 108). The proportion of combined stroke and TIA diagnoses decreased over time amongst older adults with a Neuro RFV (OR 0.95 per year, p < 0.01, CI 0.94–0.96) but did not change in the young (OR 1.00 per year, p = 0.88, CI 0.95–1.04). Within the stroke/TIA population, no changes in the proportion of stroke or TIA were identified. MRI utilization rates amongst patients with a Neuro RFV increased for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found, but did not anticipate, increased incidence of neurologically focused ED visits in both age groups. Given the lower pre-test probability of a stroke in younger adults, this suggests that false positive stroke diagnoses may be increasing and may be increasing more rapidly in the young than in older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02172-1. BioMed Central 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8028807/ /pubmed/33832441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02172-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Appukutty, Abhinav J.
Skolarus, Lesli E.
Springer, Mellanie V.
Meurer, William J.
Burke, James F.
Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
title Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
title_full Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
title_short Increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
title_sort increasing false positive diagnoses may lead to overestimation of stroke incidence, particularly in the young: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02172-1
work_keys_str_mv AT appukuttyabhinavj increasingfalsepositivediagnosesmayleadtooverestimationofstrokeincidenceparticularlyintheyoungacrosssectionalstudy
AT skolarusleslie increasingfalsepositivediagnosesmayleadtooverestimationofstrokeincidenceparticularlyintheyoungacrosssectionalstudy
AT springermellaniev increasingfalsepositivediagnosesmayleadtooverestimationofstrokeincidenceparticularlyintheyoungacrosssectionalstudy
AT meurerwilliamj increasingfalsepositivediagnosesmayleadtooverestimationofstrokeincidenceparticularlyintheyoungacrosssectionalstudy
AT burkejamesf increasingfalsepositivediagnosesmayleadtooverestimationofstrokeincidenceparticularlyintheyoungacrosssectionalstudy