Cargando…

Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway

BACKGROUND: Patients in need of palliative care often want to reside at home. Providing palliative care requires resources and a high level of competence in primary care. The Norwegian guideline for palliative care points to the central role of the regular general practitioner (RGP), specifying a hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fasting, Anne, Hetlevik, Irene, Mjølstad, Bente Prytz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8
_version_ 1783676013729808384
author Fasting, Anne
Hetlevik, Irene
Mjølstad, Bente Prytz
author_facet Fasting, Anne
Hetlevik, Irene
Mjølstad, Bente Prytz
author_sort Fasting, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients in need of palliative care often want to reside at home. Providing palliative care requires resources and a high level of competence in primary care. The Norwegian guideline for palliative care points to the central role of the regular general practitioner (RGP), specifying a high expected level of competence. Guideline implementation is known to be challenging in primary care. This study investigates adherence to the guideline, the RGPs experience with, and view of their role in palliative care. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed, by post, to all 246 RGPs in a Norwegian county. Themes of the questionnaire focused on experience with palliative and terminal care, the use of recommended work methods from the guideline, communication with partners, self-reported role in palliative care and confidence in providing palliative care. Data were analyzed descriptively, using SPSS. RESULTS: Each RGP had few patients needing palliative care, and limited experience with terminal care at home. Limited experience challenged RGPs possibilities to maintain knowledge about palliative care. Their clinical approach was not in agreement with the guideline, but most of them saw themselves as central, and were confident in the provision of palliative care. Rural RGPs saw themselves as more central in this work than their urban colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated low adherence of the RGPs, to the Norwegian guideline for palliative care. Guideline requirements may not correspond with the methods of general practice, making them difficult to adopt. The RGPs seemed to have too few clinical cases over time to maintain skills at a complex and specialized level. Yet, there seems to be a great potential for the RGP, with the inherent specialist skills of the general practitioner, to be a key worker in the palliative care trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8028821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80288212021-04-09 Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway Fasting, Anne Hetlevik, Irene Mjølstad, Bente Prytz BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients in need of palliative care often want to reside at home. Providing palliative care requires resources and a high level of competence in primary care. The Norwegian guideline for palliative care points to the central role of the regular general practitioner (RGP), specifying a high expected level of competence. Guideline implementation is known to be challenging in primary care. This study investigates adherence to the guideline, the RGPs experience with, and view of their role in palliative care. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed, by post, to all 246 RGPs in a Norwegian county. Themes of the questionnaire focused on experience with palliative and terminal care, the use of recommended work methods from the guideline, communication with partners, self-reported role in palliative care and confidence in providing palliative care. Data were analyzed descriptively, using SPSS. RESULTS: Each RGP had few patients needing palliative care, and limited experience with terminal care at home. Limited experience challenged RGPs possibilities to maintain knowledge about palliative care. Their clinical approach was not in agreement with the guideline, but most of them saw themselves as central, and were confident in the provision of palliative care. Rural RGPs saw themselves as more central in this work than their urban colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated low adherence of the RGPs, to the Norwegian guideline for palliative care. Guideline requirements may not correspond with the methods of general practice, making them difficult to adopt. The RGPs seemed to have too few clinical cases over time to maintain skills at a complex and specialized level. Yet, there seems to be a great potential for the RGP, with the inherent specialist skills of the general practitioner, to be a key worker in the palliative care trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8028821/ /pubmed/33827448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fasting, Anne
Hetlevik, Irene
Mjølstad, Bente Prytz
Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway
title Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway
title_full Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway
title_fullStr Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway
title_short Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway
title_sort palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the gps role and guideline implementation in norway
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fastinganne palliativecareingeneralpracticeaquestionnairestudyonthegpsroleandguidelineimplementationinnorway
AT hetlevikirene palliativecareingeneralpracticeaquestionnairestudyonthegpsroleandguidelineimplementationinnorway
AT mjølstadbenteprytz palliativecareingeneralpracticeaquestionnairestudyonthegpsroleandguidelineimplementationinnorway