Cargando…

Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens

BACKGROUND: This biomechanical analysis of hysterectomy specimens assesses the forces associated with intrauterine device placement. These include compressive forces required to cause uterine perforation with two commonly available commercial intrauterine device placement instruments and a metal ute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncan, Jane, Fay, Kathryn, Sanders, Jessica, Cappiello, Benjamin, Saviers-Steiger, Jane, Turok, David K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01285-6
_version_ 1783676016099590144
author Duncan, Jane
Fay, Kathryn
Sanders, Jessica
Cappiello, Benjamin
Saviers-Steiger, Jane
Turok, David K.
author_facet Duncan, Jane
Fay, Kathryn
Sanders, Jessica
Cappiello, Benjamin
Saviers-Steiger, Jane
Turok, David K.
author_sort Duncan, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This biomechanical analysis of hysterectomy specimens assesses the forces associated with intrauterine device placement. These include compressive forces required to cause uterine perforation with two commonly available commercial intrauterine device placement instruments and a metal uterine sound. METHODS: We obtained hysterectomy specimens at a single academic center. All specimens resulted from excision for benign conditions in premenopausal women by any operative method. Within one hour of excision, we stabilized uterine specimens in an apparatus specifically designed for this analysis. A single, experienced clinician performed all experimental maneuvers and measured forces with a Wagner FDIX-25 force gauge. The investigator applied traction on a tenaculum to approximate force used during an intrauterine device placement. The maximum compressive force to the uterine fundus was determined by using manufacturers’ placement instruments for two commercially available products and a metal sound. RESULTS: Sixteen individuals provided hysterectomy specimens. No complete perforations occurred while using loaded intrauterine devices; in a single observation the LNG IUS entered the myometrium. The plastic intrauterine device placement rod bowed in all attempts and did not perforate the uterine serosa at the fundus. A metal uterine sound created a complete perforation in all specimens (p < .001). The lowest mean maximum force generated occurred with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system placement instrument 12.3 N (SD ± 3.8 N), followed by the copper T380A intrauterine device placement instrument 14.1 N (SD ± 4.0 N), and highest for the metal sound 17.9 N (SD ± 7.6 N) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this ex-vivo model, metal uterine sounds caused complete perforation and intrauterine device placement instruments did not. This study received Institutional Review Board (IRB0059096) approval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8028834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80288342021-04-09 Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens Duncan, Jane Fay, Kathryn Sanders, Jessica Cappiello, Benjamin Saviers-Steiger, Jane Turok, David K. BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: This biomechanical analysis of hysterectomy specimens assesses the forces associated with intrauterine device placement. These include compressive forces required to cause uterine perforation with two commonly available commercial intrauterine device placement instruments and a metal uterine sound. METHODS: We obtained hysterectomy specimens at a single academic center. All specimens resulted from excision for benign conditions in premenopausal women by any operative method. Within one hour of excision, we stabilized uterine specimens in an apparatus specifically designed for this analysis. A single, experienced clinician performed all experimental maneuvers and measured forces with a Wagner FDIX-25 force gauge. The investigator applied traction on a tenaculum to approximate force used during an intrauterine device placement. The maximum compressive force to the uterine fundus was determined by using manufacturers’ placement instruments for two commercially available products and a metal sound. RESULTS: Sixteen individuals provided hysterectomy specimens. No complete perforations occurred while using loaded intrauterine devices; in a single observation the LNG IUS entered the myometrium. The plastic intrauterine device placement rod bowed in all attempts and did not perforate the uterine serosa at the fundus. A metal uterine sound created a complete perforation in all specimens (p < .001). The lowest mean maximum force generated occurred with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system placement instrument 12.3 N (SD ± 3.8 N), followed by the copper T380A intrauterine device placement instrument 14.1 N (SD ± 4.0 N), and highest for the metal sound 17.9 N (SD ± 7.6 N) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this ex-vivo model, metal uterine sounds caused complete perforation and intrauterine device placement instruments did not. This study received Institutional Review Board (IRB0059096) approval. BioMed Central 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8028834/ /pubmed/33827522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01285-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duncan, Jane
Fay, Kathryn
Sanders, Jessica
Cappiello, Benjamin
Saviers-Steiger, Jane
Turok, David K.
Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
title Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
title_full Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
title_fullStr Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
title_full_unstemmed Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
title_short Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
title_sort ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01285-6
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanjane exvivoforcesassociatedwithintrauterinedeviceplacementandperforationabiomechanicalevaluationofhysterectomyspecimens
AT faykathryn exvivoforcesassociatedwithintrauterinedeviceplacementandperforationabiomechanicalevaluationofhysterectomyspecimens
AT sandersjessica exvivoforcesassociatedwithintrauterinedeviceplacementandperforationabiomechanicalevaluationofhysterectomyspecimens
AT cappiellobenjamin exvivoforcesassociatedwithintrauterinedeviceplacementandperforationabiomechanicalevaluationofhysterectomyspecimens
AT savierssteigerjane exvivoforcesassociatedwithintrauterinedeviceplacementandperforationabiomechanicalevaluationofhysterectomyspecimens
AT turokdavidk exvivoforcesassociatedwithintrauterinedeviceplacementandperforationabiomechanicalevaluationofhysterectomyspecimens