Cargando…

Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?

AIM: To determine whether de‐escalating from advanced insulin therapy (AIT) to the combined use of metformin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, a GLP1 receptor agonist and basal insulin is the better option than multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in obese patients with poorly controlled T2DM. METHODS: This w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naing, Soe, Ramesh, Geeta, Garcha, Jasmine, Poliyedath, Anupama, Khandelwal, Stutee, Mills, Paul K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8029542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.204
_version_ 1783676034643656704
author Naing, Soe
Ramesh, Geeta
Garcha, Jasmine
Poliyedath, Anupama
Khandelwal, Stutee
Mills, Paul K.
author_facet Naing, Soe
Ramesh, Geeta
Garcha, Jasmine
Poliyedath, Anupama
Khandelwal, Stutee
Mills, Paul K.
author_sort Naing, Soe
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine whether de‐escalating from advanced insulin therapy (AIT) to the combined use of metformin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, a GLP1 receptor agonist and basal insulin is the better option than multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in obese patients with poorly controlled T2DM. METHODS: This was a 16‐week, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Twenty‐two obese patients with T2DM on AIT were randomized to intervention (step‐down) or control (MDI) group. In the intervention group, all prandial insulin injections were discontinued, but the patient remained on basal insulin and metformin, to which an SGLT2i and a GLP1 RA were added. In the control group, the patient remained on MDI. RESULTS: Compared to control group (n = 8), A1c was significantly lower at week 4 (9.54% vs 8.25%; p = .0088) and week 16 (9.7% vs 7.31%; p < .001) in intervention group (n = 10). In intervention group, compared to baseline, there was a significant decrease in weight (−16.38 pounds; p = .003), BMI (−3.06; p < .001), LDL cholesterol (−15.7 mg/dl; p = .0378), total cholesterol (−18.5 mg/dl; p = .0386), total daily insulin dose (−57.3 units; p < .001) and a significant improvement in DM‐SAT patient satisfaction 0‐100 scores: total score (+45.3; p < .001) and subscale scores (Convenience + 35.28, p = .019; Lifestyle + 35.8, p = .0052; Medical control + 51.3, p < .001; Wellbeing + 47.2, p = .0091) at week 16. CONCLUSION: De‐escalating from AIT to the combined use of metformin, SGLT2i, GLP1 RA and basal insulin in obese patients with poorly controlled T2DM on MDI resulted in significant improvement in glycaemic control, weight loss and significantly higher patient satisfaction. This stepping‐down approach may be the better option than continuing MDI in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8029542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80295422021-04-13 Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy? Naing, Soe Ramesh, Geeta Garcha, Jasmine Poliyedath, Anupama Khandelwal, Stutee Mills, Paul K. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original Research Articles AIM: To determine whether de‐escalating from advanced insulin therapy (AIT) to the combined use of metformin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, a GLP1 receptor agonist and basal insulin is the better option than multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in obese patients with poorly controlled T2DM. METHODS: This was a 16‐week, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Twenty‐two obese patients with T2DM on AIT were randomized to intervention (step‐down) or control (MDI) group. In the intervention group, all prandial insulin injections were discontinued, but the patient remained on basal insulin and metformin, to which an SGLT2i and a GLP1 RA were added. In the control group, the patient remained on MDI. RESULTS: Compared to control group (n = 8), A1c was significantly lower at week 4 (9.54% vs 8.25%; p = .0088) and week 16 (9.7% vs 7.31%; p < .001) in intervention group (n = 10). In intervention group, compared to baseline, there was a significant decrease in weight (−16.38 pounds; p = .003), BMI (−3.06; p < .001), LDL cholesterol (−15.7 mg/dl; p = .0378), total cholesterol (−18.5 mg/dl; p = .0386), total daily insulin dose (−57.3 units; p < .001) and a significant improvement in DM‐SAT patient satisfaction 0‐100 scores: total score (+45.3; p < .001) and subscale scores (Convenience + 35.28, p = .019; Lifestyle + 35.8, p = .0052; Medical control + 51.3, p < .001; Wellbeing + 47.2, p = .0091) at week 16. CONCLUSION: De‐escalating from AIT to the combined use of metformin, SGLT2i, GLP1 RA and basal insulin in obese patients with poorly controlled T2DM on MDI resulted in significant improvement in glycaemic control, weight loss and significantly higher patient satisfaction. This stepping‐down approach may be the better option than continuing MDI in these patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8029542/ /pubmed/33855207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.204 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Naing, Soe
Ramesh, Geeta
Garcha, Jasmine
Poliyedath, Anupama
Khandelwal, Stutee
Mills, Paul K.
Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
title Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
title_full Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
title_fullStr Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
title_short Is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
title_sort is the stepping‐down approach a better option than multiple daily injections in obese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on advanced insulin therapy?
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8029542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.204
work_keys_str_mv AT naingsoe isthesteppingdownapproachabetteroptionthanmultipledailyinjectionsinobesepatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabetesonadvancedinsulintherapy
AT rameshgeeta isthesteppingdownapproachabetteroptionthanmultipledailyinjectionsinobesepatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabetesonadvancedinsulintherapy
AT garchajasmine isthesteppingdownapproachabetteroptionthanmultipledailyinjectionsinobesepatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabetesonadvancedinsulintherapy
AT poliyedathanupama isthesteppingdownapproachabetteroptionthanmultipledailyinjectionsinobesepatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabetesonadvancedinsulintherapy
AT khandelwalstutee isthesteppingdownapproachabetteroptionthanmultipledailyinjectionsinobesepatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabetesonadvancedinsulintherapy
AT millspaulk isthesteppingdownapproachabetteroptionthanmultipledailyinjectionsinobesepatientswithpoorlycontrolledtype2diabetesonadvancedinsulintherapy