Cargando…
P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study
BACKGROUND: False penicillin allergy labels can be potentially hazardous to patients. Most penicillin allergy labels can be safely removed following risk stratification and formal drug challenge. These de-labelling strategies have been limited to specialist allergy and infectious disease services. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030137/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.029 |
_version_ | 1783676076816334848 |
---|---|
author | Owens, Rhys Sandoe, Jonathan Whyte, Andrew West, Robert Slatter, Mandy Stonell, Rebecca Powell, Neil |
author_facet | Owens, Rhys Sandoe, Jonathan Whyte, Andrew West, Robert Slatter, Mandy Stonell, Rebecca Powell, Neil |
author_sort | Owens, Rhys |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: False penicillin allergy labels can be potentially hazardous to patients. Most penicillin allergy labels can be safely removed following risk stratification and formal drug challenge. These de-labelling strategies have been limited to specialist allergy and infectious disease services. AIMS: To determine whether non-allergy specialist health-care workers can use an antibiotic allergy assessment tool (AAAT) to correctly phenotype and manage reported penicillin allergy. METHOD: Non-allergy health-care workers in three UK hospital were emailed online questionnaires and asked to assign the allergy phenotype and management recommendation for eight vignettes of real cases reporting a penicillin allergy using the AAAT. In one hospital participants were randomised into two groups: one group was directed to use the AAAT whilst the second group had no decision tool. Participants were assigned an average score for correct allergy phenotype, management and a major error rate. RESULTS: Use of the AAAT across the eight vignettes significantly improved the average score for assigning correct phenotype (6.7 vs 5.2 p < 0.001), management choice (7.1 vs 5.7 p < 0.001), and major error rate (0.6 vs 1.6 p < 0.001). Participant performance with the AAAT was generalizable across all three hospitals. Despite use of the AAAT 35-40% of participants made at least one major error. CONCLUSION: The AAAT significantly improved health worker performance in phenotyping and choosing correct management for reported penicillin. However, even with the AAAT, there remains a risk of potentially hazardous management choices highlighting the need for formal allergy training to expand penicillin allergy assessment services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8030137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80301372021-04-13 P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study Owens, Rhys Sandoe, Jonathan Whyte, Andrew West, Robert Slatter, Mandy Stonell, Rebecca Powell, Neil BJS Open Poster Presentation BACKGROUND: False penicillin allergy labels can be potentially hazardous to patients. Most penicillin allergy labels can be safely removed following risk stratification and formal drug challenge. These de-labelling strategies have been limited to specialist allergy and infectious disease services. AIMS: To determine whether non-allergy specialist health-care workers can use an antibiotic allergy assessment tool (AAAT) to correctly phenotype and manage reported penicillin allergy. METHOD: Non-allergy health-care workers in three UK hospital were emailed online questionnaires and asked to assign the allergy phenotype and management recommendation for eight vignettes of real cases reporting a penicillin allergy using the AAAT. In one hospital participants were randomised into two groups: one group was directed to use the AAAT whilst the second group had no decision tool. Participants were assigned an average score for correct allergy phenotype, management and a major error rate. RESULTS: Use of the AAAT across the eight vignettes significantly improved the average score for assigning correct phenotype (6.7 vs 5.2 p < 0.001), management choice (7.1 vs 5.7 p < 0.001), and major error rate (0.6 vs 1.6 p < 0.001). Participant performance with the AAAT was generalizable across all three hospitals. Despite use of the AAAT 35-40% of participants made at least one major error. CONCLUSION: The AAAT significantly improved health worker performance in phenotyping and choosing correct management for reported penicillin. However, even with the AAAT, there remains a risk of potentially hazardous management choices highlighting the need for formal allergy training to expand penicillin allergy assessment services. Oxford University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8030137/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.029 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercialre-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentation Owens, Rhys Sandoe, Jonathan Whyte, Andrew West, Robert Slatter, Mandy Stonell, Rebecca Powell, Neil P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study |
title | P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study |
title_full | P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study |
title_fullStr | P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study |
title_full_unstemmed | P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study |
title_short | P30 Can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - A multicentre study |
title_sort | p30 can non-allergy health workers safely delabel reported penicillin allergies using an antibiotic allergy assessment tool? - a multicentre study |
topic | Poster Presentation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030137/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owensrhys p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy AT sandoejonathan p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy AT whyteandrew p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy AT westrobert p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy AT slattermandy p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy AT stonellrebecca p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy AT powellneil p30cannonallergyhealthworkerssafelydelabelreportedpenicillinallergiesusinganantibioticallergyassessmenttoolamulticentrestudy |