Cargando…

P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study

INTRODUCTION: Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gwilym, B, Waldron, C, Thomas-Jones, E, Pallmann, P, Preece, R, Brookes-Howell, L, Milosevic, S, Edwards, A, Twine, C, Massey, I, Burton, J, Harris, D, Samuel, K, Dilaver, N, Day, S, Bosanquet, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030154/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.089
_version_ 1783676080833429504
author Gwilym, B
Waldron, C
Thomas-Jones, E
Pallmann, P
Preece, R
Brookes-Howell, L
Milosevic, S
Edwards, A
Twine, C
Massey, I
Burton, J
Harris, D
Samuel, K
Dilaver, N
Day, S
Bosanquet, D
author_facet Gwilym, B
Waldron, C
Thomas-Jones, E
Pallmann, P
Preece, R
Brookes-Howell, L
Milosevic, S
Edwards, A
Twine, C
Massey, I
Burton, J
Harris, D
Samuel, K
Dilaver, N
Day, S
Bosanquet, D
author_sort Gwilym, B
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? METHODS: A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. RESULTS: PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8030154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80301542021-04-13 P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study Gwilym, B Waldron, C Thomas-Jones, E Pallmann, P Preece, R Brookes-Howell, L Milosevic, S Edwards, A Twine, C Massey, I Burton, J Harris, D Samuel, K Dilaver, N Day, S Bosanquet, D BJS Open Poster Presentation INTRODUCTION: Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? METHODS: A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. RESULTS: PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort. Oxford University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8030154/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.089 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercialre-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Presentation
Gwilym, B
Waldron, C
Thomas-Jones, E
Pallmann, P
Preece, R
Brookes-Howell, L
Milosevic, S
Edwards, A
Twine, C
Massey, I
Burton, J
Harris, D
Samuel, K
Dilaver, N
Day, S
Bosanquet, D
P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study
title P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study
title_full P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study
title_fullStr P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study
title_full_unstemmed P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study
title_short P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study
title_sort p90 perceive: prediction of risk and communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaborative study
topic Poster Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030154/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.089
work_keys_str_mv AT gwilymb p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT waldronc p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT thomasjonese p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT pallmannp p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT preecer p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT brookeshowelll p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT milosevics p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT edwardsa p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT twinec p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT masseyi p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT burtonj p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT harrisd p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT samuelk p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT dilavern p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT days p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy
AT bosanquetd p90perceivepredictionofriskandcommunicationofoutcomefollowingmajorlowerlimbamputationacollaborativestudy