Cargando…
P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure compl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030181/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.028 |
_version_ | 1783676086697066496 |
---|---|
author | Marson, Ella J Botkai, Adam H Coleman, Jamie J Evison, Felicity Atia, Jolene Wang, Jingyi Gallier, Suzy Speakman, John Pankhurst, Tanya |
author_facet | Marson, Ella J Botkai, Adam H Coleman, Jamie J Evison, Felicity Atia, Jolene Wang, Jingyi Gallier, Suzy Speakman, John Pankhurst, Tanya |
author_sort | Marson, Ella J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure complicates the benefit/harm balance of CPR. METHODS: The study is based at a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom where all DNACPR decisions are documented on an electronic healthcare record (EHR). Data from all DNACPR/TEAL status forms between 1st January 2017 and 30th April 2020 were collected and analysed. We compared patterns of decision making and rates of form completion during the 2-month peak pandemic phase to an analogous period during 2019. RESULTS: A total of 16,007 forms were completed during the study period with a marked increase in form completion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with a form completed were on average younger and had fewer co-morbidities during the COVID-19 period than in March-April 2019. Several questions on the DNACPR/TEAL forms were answered significantly differently with increases in patients being identified as suitable for CPR (23.8% versus 9.05%; p < 0.001) and full active treatment (30.5% versus 26.1%; p = 0.028). Whilst proportions of discussions that involved the patient remained similar during COVID-19 (95.8% versus 95.6%; p = 0.871), fewer discussions took place with relatives (50.6% versus 75.4%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on senior decision making and conversations around ceilings of treatment appears to have changed practice, with a higher proportion of patients having DNACPR/TEAL status documented. Understanding patient preferences around life-sustaining treatment versus comfort care is part of holistic practice and supports shared decision making. It is unclear whether these attitudinal changes will be sustained after COVID-19 admissions decrease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8030181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80301812021-04-13 P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice Marson, Ella J Botkai, Adam H Coleman, Jamie J Evison, Felicity Atia, Jolene Wang, Jingyi Gallier, Suzy Speakman, John Pankhurst, Tanya BJS Open Poster Presentation BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure complicates the benefit/harm balance of CPR. METHODS: The study is based at a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom where all DNACPR decisions are documented on an electronic healthcare record (EHR). Data from all DNACPR/TEAL status forms between 1st January 2017 and 30th April 2020 were collected and analysed. We compared patterns of decision making and rates of form completion during the 2-month peak pandemic phase to an analogous period during 2019. RESULTS: A total of 16,007 forms were completed during the study period with a marked increase in form completion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with a form completed were on average younger and had fewer co-morbidities during the COVID-19 period than in March-April 2019. Several questions on the DNACPR/TEAL forms were answered significantly differently with increases in patients being identified as suitable for CPR (23.8% versus 9.05%; p < 0.001) and full active treatment (30.5% versus 26.1%; p = 0.028). Whilst proportions of discussions that involved the patient remained similar during COVID-19 (95.8% versus 95.6%; p = 0.871), fewer discussions took place with relatives (50.6% versus 75.4%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on senior decision making and conversations around ceilings of treatment appears to have changed practice, with a higher proportion of patients having DNACPR/TEAL status documented. Understanding patient preferences around life-sustaining treatment versus comfort care is part of holistic practice and supports shared decision making. It is unclear whether these attitudinal changes will be sustained after COVID-19 admissions decrease. Oxford University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8030181/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.028 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercialre-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentation Marson, Ella J Botkai, Adam H Coleman, Jamie J Evison, Felicity Atia, Jolene Wang, Jingyi Gallier, Suzy Speakman, John Pankhurst, Tanya P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice |
title | P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice |
title_full | P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice |
title_fullStr | P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice |
title_full_unstemmed | P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice |
title_short | P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice |
title_sort | p29 bringing into focus treatment limitation and dnacpr decisions: how covid-19 has changed practice |
topic | Poster Presentation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030181/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marsonellaj p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT botkaiadamh p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT colemanjamiej p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT evisonfelicity p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT atiajolene p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT wangjingyi p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT galliersuzy p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT speakmanjohn p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice AT pankhursttanya p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice |