Cargando…

P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marson, Ella J, Botkai, Adam H, Coleman, Jamie J, Evison, Felicity, Atia, Jolene, Wang, Jingyi, Gallier, Suzy, Speakman, John, Pankhurst, Tanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030181/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.028
_version_ 1783676086697066496
author Marson, Ella J
Botkai, Adam H
Coleman, Jamie J
Evison, Felicity
Atia, Jolene
Wang, Jingyi
Gallier, Suzy
Speakman, John
Pankhurst, Tanya
author_facet Marson, Ella J
Botkai, Adam H
Coleman, Jamie J
Evison, Felicity
Atia, Jolene
Wang, Jingyi
Gallier, Suzy
Speakman, John
Pankhurst, Tanya
author_sort Marson, Ella J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure complicates the benefit/harm balance of CPR. METHODS: The study is based at a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom where all DNACPR decisions are documented on an electronic healthcare record (EHR). Data from all DNACPR/TEAL status forms between 1st January 2017 and 30th April 2020 were collected and analysed. We compared patterns of decision making and rates of form completion during the 2-month peak pandemic phase to an analogous period during 2019. RESULTS: A total of 16,007 forms were completed during the study period with a marked increase in form completion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with a form completed were on average younger and had fewer co-morbidities during the COVID-19 period than in March-April 2019. Several questions on the DNACPR/TEAL forms were answered significantly differently with increases in patients being identified as suitable for CPR (23.8% versus 9.05%; p < 0.001) and full active treatment (30.5% versus 26.1%; p = 0.028). Whilst proportions of discussions that involved the patient remained similar during COVID-19 (95.8% versus 95.6%; p = 0.871), fewer discussions took place with relatives (50.6% versus 75.4%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on senior decision making and conversations around ceilings of treatment appears to have changed practice, with a higher proportion of patients having DNACPR/TEAL status documented. Understanding patient preferences around life-sustaining treatment versus comfort care is part of holistic practice and supports shared decision making. It is unclear whether these attitudinal changes will be sustained after COVID-19 admissions decrease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8030181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80301812021-04-13 P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice Marson, Ella J Botkai, Adam H Coleman, Jamie J Evison, Felicity Atia, Jolene Wang, Jingyi Gallier, Suzy Speakman, John Pankhurst, Tanya BJS Open Poster Presentation BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure complicates the benefit/harm balance of CPR. METHODS: The study is based at a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom where all DNACPR decisions are documented on an electronic healthcare record (EHR). Data from all DNACPR/TEAL status forms between 1st January 2017 and 30th April 2020 were collected and analysed. We compared patterns of decision making and rates of form completion during the 2-month peak pandemic phase to an analogous period during 2019. RESULTS: A total of 16,007 forms were completed during the study period with a marked increase in form completion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with a form completed were on average younger and had fewer co-morbidities during the COVID-19 period than in March-April 2019. Several questions on the DNACPR/TEAL forms were answered significantly differently with increases in patients being identified as suitable for CPR (23.8% versus 9.05%; p < 0.001) and full active treatment (30.5% versus 26.1%; p = 0.028). Whilst proportions of discussions that involved the patient remained similar during COVID-19 (95.8% versus 95.6%; p = 0.871), fewer discussions took place with relatives (50.6% versus 75.4%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on senior decision making and conversations around ceilings of treatment appears to have changed practice, with a higher proportion of patients having DNACPR/TEAL status documented. Understanding patient preferences around life-sustaining treatment versus comfort care is part of holistic practice and supports shared decision making. It is unclear whether these attitudinal changes will be sustained after COVID-19 admissions decrease. Oxford University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8030181/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.028 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercialre-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Presentation
Marson, Ella J
Botkai, Adam H
Coleman, Jamie J
Evison, Felicity
Atia, Jolene
Wang, Jingyi
Gallier, Suzy
Speakman, John
Pankhurst, Tanya
P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
title P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
title_full P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
title_fullStr P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
title_full_unstemmed P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
title_short P29 Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice
title_sort p29 bringing into focus treatment limitation and dnacpr decisions: how covid-19 has changed practice
topic Poster Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030181/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.028
work_keys_str_mv AT marsonellaj p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT botkaiadamh p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT colemanjamiej p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT evisonfelicity p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT atiajolene p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT wangjingyi p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT galliersuzy p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT speakmanjohn p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice
AT pankhursttanya p29bringingintofocustreatmentlimitationanddnacprdecisionshowcovid19haschangedpractice