Cargando…
P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION: There is currently no definite consensus regarding the surgical treatment of moyamoya disease (MMD). This study aimed to compare direct and combined versus indirect bypasses with regard to perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients with MMD. METHODS: Systematic searche...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030237/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.043 |
_version_ | 1783676099160440832 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Keng Siang Zhang, John J Y Teo, Mario Steinberg, Gary K |
author_facet | Lee, Keng Siang Zhang, John J Y Teo, Mario Steinberg, Gary K |
author_sort | Lee, Keng Siang |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is currently no definite consensus regarding the surgical treatment of moyamoya disease (MMD). This study aimed to compare direct and combined versus indirect bypasses with regard to perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients with MMD. METHODS: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were undertaken. Primary outcome measures analyzed included perioperative complications defined as any major adverse events within 30 days after bypass surgery. RESULTS: 2490 studies were identified. 20 reporting 2982 patients were eventually included in our meta-analysis. Pooled mean age was 37.5 years (95%CI:33.5–41.5) and 7.4 years (95%CI:4.1–10.7) in adult and pediatric patients respectively. For adult patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.26 [95%CI:0.81–1.96], p = 0.300 for indirect bypass). For pediatric patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 2.43[95%CI:0.74–7.94], p = 0.143 for indirect bypass). No difference was found in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass for adult patients (OR = 1.16[95%CI:0.07–19.00], p = 0.915 for indirect bypass). There was no difference in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.39 [95%CI:0 –Inf], p = 1.00 for indirect bypass) in pediatric patients. There was no significant difference in perioperative neurological deficit rates between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.27[95%CI:0.68–2.39], p = 0.451 for indirect bypass). DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis provides statistical evidence suggesting that both direct and indirect bypasses can be equally effective in preventing stroke, with similar rates of perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8030237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80302372021-04-13 P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lee, Keng Siang Zhang, John J Y Teo, Mario Steinberg, Gary K BJS Open Poster Presentation INTRODUCTION: There is currently no definite consensus regarding the surgical treatment of moyamoya disease (MMD). This study aimed to compare direct and combined versus indirect bypasses with regard to perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients with MMD. METHODS: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were undertaken. Primary outcome measures analyzed included perioperative complications defined as any major adverse events within 30 days after bypass surgery. RESULTS: 2490 studies were identified. 20 reporting 2982 patients were eventually included in our meta-analysis. Pooled mean age was 37.5 years (95%CI:33.5–41.5) and 7.4 years (95%CI:4.1–10.7) in adult and pediatric patients respectively. For adult patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.26 [95%CI:0.81–1.96], p = 0.300 for indirect bypass). For pediatric patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 2.43[95%CI:0.74–7.94], p = 0.143 for indirect bypass). No difference was found in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass for adult patients (OR = 1.16[95%CI:0.07–19.00], p = 0.915 for indirect bypass). There was no difference in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.39 [95%CI:0 –Inf], p = 1.00 for indirect bypass) in pediatric patients. There was no significant difference in perioperative neurological deficit rates between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.27[95%CI:0.68–2.39], p = 0.451 for indirect bypass). DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis provides statistical evidence suggesting that both direct and indirect bypasses can be equally effective in preventing stroke, with similar rates of perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients. Oxford University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8030237/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.043 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercialre-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentation Lee, Keng Siang Zhang, John J Y Teo, Mario Steinberg, Gary K P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | p44 direct and combined revascularization versus indirect revascularization in the treatment of moyamoya disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Poster Presentation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030237/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekengsiang p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjohnjy p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT teomario p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT steinberggaryk p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |