Cargando…

P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: There is currently no definite consensus regarding the surgical treatment of moyamoya disease (MMD). This study aimed to compare direct and combined versus indirect bypasses with regard to perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients with MMD. METHODS: Systematic searche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Keng Siang, Zhang, John J Y, Teo, Mario, Steinberg, Gary K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030237/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.043
_version_ 1783676099160440832
author Lee, Keng Siang
Zhang, John J Y
Teo, Mario
Steinberg, Gary K
author_facet Lee, Keng Siang
Zhang, John J Y
Teo, Mario
Steinberg, Gary K
author_sort Lee, Keng Siang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is currently no definite consensus regarding the surgical treatment of moyamoya disease (MMD). This study aimed to compare direct and combined versus indirect bypasses with regard to perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients with MMD. METHODS: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were undertaken. Primary outcome measures analyzed included perioperative complications defined as any major adverse events within 30 days after bypass surgery. RESULTS: 2490 studies were identified. 20 reporting 2982 patients were eventually included in our meta-analysis. Pooled mean age was 37.5 years (95%CI:33.5–41.5) and 7.4 years (95%CI:4.1–10.7) in adult and pediatric patients respectively. For adult patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.26 [95%CI:0.81–1.96], p = 0.300 for indirect bypass). For pediatric patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 2.43[95%CI:0.74–7.94], p = 0.143 for indirect bypass). No difference was found in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass for adult patients (OR = 1.16[95%CI:0.07–19.00], p = 0.915 for indirect bypass). There was no difference in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.39 [95%CI:0 –Inf], p = 1.00 for indirect bypass) in pediatric patients. There was no significant difference in perioperative neurological deficit rates between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.27[95%CI:0.68–2.39], p = 0.451 for indirect bypass). DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis provides statistical evidence suggesting that both direct and indirect bypasses can be equally effective in preventing stroke, with similar rates of perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8030237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80302372021-04-13 P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lee, Keng Siang Zhang, John J Y Teo, Mario Steinberg, Gary K BJS Open Poster Presentation INTRODUCTION: There is currently no definite consensus regarding the surgical treatment of moyamoya disease (MMD). This study aimed to compare direct and combined versus indirect bypasses with regard to perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients with MMD. METHODS: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were undertaken. Primary outcome measures analyzed included perioperative complications defined as any major adverse events within 30 days after bypass surgery. RESULTS: 2490 studies were identified. 20 reporting 2982 patients were eventually included in our meta-analysis. Pooled mean age was 37.5 years (95%CI:33.5–41.5) and 7.4 years (95%CI:4.1–10.7) in adult and pediatric patients respectively. For adult patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.26 [95%CI:0.81–1.96], p = 0.300 for indirect bypass). For pediatric patients, perioperative stroke rate was comparable between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 2.43[95%CI:0.74–7.94], p = 0.143 for indirect bypass). No difference was found in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass for adult patients (OR = 1.16[95%CI:0.07–19.00], p = 0.915 for indirect bypass). There was no difference in perioperative mortality between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.39 [95%CI:0 –Inf], p = 1.00 for indirect bypass) in pediatric patients. There was no significant difference in perioperative neurological deficit rates between direct/combined bypass and indirect bypass (OR = 1.27[95%CI:0.68–2.39], p = 0.451 for indirect bypass). DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis provides statistical evidence suggesting that both direct and indirect bypasses can be equally effective in preventing stroke, with similar rates of perioperative complications in pediatric and adult patients. Oxford University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8030237/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.043 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercialre-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Presentation
Lee, Keng Siang
Zhang, John J Y
Teo, Mario
Steinberg, Gary K
P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short P44 Direct and Combined Revascularization Versus Indirect Revascularization in the Treatment of Moyamoya Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort p44 direct and combined revascularization versus indirect revascularization in the treatment of moyamoya disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Poster Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8030237/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.043
work_keys_str_mv AT leekengsiang p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjohnjy p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT teomario p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT steinberggaryk p44directandcombinedrevascularizationversusindirectrevascularizationinthetreatmentofmoyamoyadiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis