Cargando…
Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National Health Service. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open feasibility trial with emb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8031014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043364 |
_version_ | 1783676134749110272 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Judith Coleman, Elizabeth Jackson, Cath Bell, Kerry Maynard, Christina Hickson, Louise Forster, Anne Fairhurst, Caroline Hewitt, Catherine Gardner, Rob Iley, Kate Gailey, Lorraine Thyer, Nicholas J |
author_facet | Watson, Judith Coleman, Elizabeth Jackson, Cath Bell, Kerry Maynard, Christina Hickson, Louise Forster, Anne Fairhurst, Caroline Hewitt, Catherine Gardner, Rob Iley, Kate Gailey, Lorraine Thyer, Nicholas J |
author_sort | Watson, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National Health Service. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open feasibility trial with embedded economic and process evaluations. SETTING: Audiology departments in two hospitals in two UK cities. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve hearing aid users aged 18 years or over who reported moderate or less than moderate benefit from their new hearing aid. INTERVENTIONS: Consenting participants (along with a significant other) were to be randomised by a remote, centralised randomisation service in groups to ACE plus treatment-as-usual (intervention group) or treatment-as-usual only (control group). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and acceptability to participants and fidelity of treatment delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids, Self-Assessment of Communication, EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form 36. Blinding of the participants and facilitator was not possible. RESULTS: Twelve hearing aid users and six significant others consented to take part. Eight hearing aid users were randomised: four to the intervention group; and four to treatment-as-usual only. Four significant others participated alongside the randomised participants. Recruitment to the study was very low and centres only screened 466 hearing aid users over the 15-month recruitment period, compared with the approximately 3500 anticipated. Only one ACE group and one control group were formed. ACE could be delivered and appeared acceptable to participants. We were unable to robustly assess attrition and attendance rates due to the low sample size. CONCLUSIONS: While ACE appeared acceptable to hearing aid users and feasible to deliver, it was not feasible to identify and recruit participants struggling with their hearing aids at the 3-month posthearing aid fitting point. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28090877. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8031014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80310142021-04-27 Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) Watson, Judith Coleman, Elizabeth Jackson, Cath Bell, Kerry Maynard, Christina Hickson, Louise Forster, Anne Fairhurst, Caroline Hewitt, Catherine Gardner, Rob Iley, Kate Gailey, Lorraine Thyer, Nicholas J BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National Health Service. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open feasibility trial with embedded economic and process evaluations. SETTING: Audiology departments in two hospitals in two UK cities. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve hearing aid users aged 18 years or over who reported moderate or less than moderate benefit from their new hearing aid. INTERVENTIONS: Consenting participants (along with a significant other) were to be randomised by a remote, centralised randomisation service in groups to ACE plus treatment-as-usual (intervention group) or treatment-as-usual only (control group). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and acceptability to participants and fidelity of treatment delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids, Self-Assessment of Communication, EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form 36. Blinding of the participants and facilitator was not possible. RESULTS: Twelve hearing aid users and six significant others consented to take part. Eight hearing aid users were randomised: four to the intervention group; and four to treatment-as-usual only. Four significant others participated alongside the randomised participants. Recruitment to the study was very low and centres only screened 466 hearing aid users over the 15-month recruitment period, compared with the approximately 3500 anticipated. Only one ACE group and one control group were formed. ACE could be delivered and appeared acceptable to participants. We were unable to robustly assess attrition and attendance rates due to the low sample size. CONCLUSIONS: While ACE appeared acceptable to hearing aid users and feasible to deliver, it was not feasible to identify and recruit participants struggling with their hearing aids at the 3-month posthearing aid fitting point. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28090877. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8031014/ /pubmed/33827834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043364 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology Watson, Judith Coleman, Elizabeth Jackson, Cath Bell, Kerry Maynard, Christina Hickson, Louise Forster, Anne Fairhurst, Caroline Hewitt, Catherine Gardner, Rob Iley, Kate Gailey, Lorraine Thyer, Nicholas J Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) |
title | Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) |
title_full | Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) |
title_short | Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) |
title_sort | randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ace to hear) |
topic | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8031014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonjudith randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT colemanelizabeth randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT jacksoncath randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT bellkerry randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT maynardchristina randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT hicksonlouise randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT forsteranne randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT fairhurstcaroline randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT hewittcatherine randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT gardnerrob randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT ileykate randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT gaileylorraine randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear AT thyernicholasj randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear |