Cargando…

Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)

OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National Health Service. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open feasibility trial with emb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Judith, Coleman, Elizabeth, Jackson, Cath, Bell, Kerry, Maynard, Christina, Hickson, Louise, Forster, Anne, Fairhurst, Caroline, Hewitt, Catherine, Gardner, Rob, Iley, Kate, Gailey, Lorraine, Thyer, Nicholas J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8031014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043364
_version_ 1783676134749110272
author Watson, Judith
Coleman, Elizabeth
Jackson, Cath
Bell, Kerry
Maynard, Christina
Hickson, Louise
Forster, Anne
Fairhurst, Caroline
Hewitt, Catherine
Gardner, Rob
Iley, Kate
Gailey, Lorraine
Thyer, Nicholas J
author_facet Watson, Judith
Coleman, Elizabeth
Jackson, Cath
Bell, Kerry
Maynard, Christina
Hickson, Louise
Forster, Anne
Fairhurst, Caroline
Hewitt, Catherine
Gardner, Rob
Iley, Kate
Gailey, Lorraine
Thyer, Nicholas J
author_sort Watson, Judith
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National Health Service. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open feasibility trial with embedded economic and process evaluations. SETTING: Audiology departments in two hospitals in two UK cities. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve hearing aid users aged 18 years or over who reported moderate or less than moderate benefit from their new hearing aid. INTERVENTIONS: Consenting participants (along with a significant other) were to be randomised by a remote, centralised randomisation service in groups to ACE plus treatment-as-usual (intervention group) or treatment-as-usual only (control group). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and acceptability to participants and fidelity of treatment delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids, Self-Assessment of Communication, EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form 36. Blinding of the participants and facilitator was not possible. RESULTS: Twelve hearing aid users and six significant others consented to take part. Eight hearing aid users were randomised: four to the intervention group; and four to treatment-as-usual only. Four significant others participated alongside the randomised participants. Recruitment to the study was very low and centres only screened 466 hearing aid users over the 15-month recruitment period, compared with the approximately 3500 anticipated. Only one ACE group and one control group were formed. ACE could be delivered and appeared acceptable to participants. We were unable to robustly assess attrition and attendance rates due to the low sample size. CONCLUSIONS: While ACE appeared acceptable to hearing aid users and feasible to deliver, it was not feasible to identify and recruit participants struggling with their hearing aids at the 3-month posthearing aid fitting point. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28090877.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8031014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80310142021-04-27 Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR) Watson, Judith Coleman, Elizabeth Jackson, Cath Bell, Kerry Maynard, Christina Hickson, Louise Forster, Anne Fairhurst, Caroline Hewitt, Catherine Gardner, Rob Iley, Kate Gailey, Lorraine Thyer, Nicholas J BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology OBJECTIVE: To establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National Health Service. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open feasibility trial with embedded economic and process evaluations. SETTING: Audiology departments in two hospitals in two UK cities. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve hearing aid users aged 18 years or over who reported moderate or less than moderate benefit from their new hearing aid. INTERVENTIONS: Consenting participants (along with a significant other) were to be randomised by a remote, centralised randomisation service in groups to ACE plus treatment-as-usual (intervention group) or treatment-as-usual only (control group). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention, treatment adherence and acceptability to participants and fidelity of treatment delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids, Self-Assessment of Communication, EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form 36. Blinding of the participants and facilitator was not possible. RESULTS: Twelve hearing aid users and six significant others consented to take part. Eight hearing aid users were randomised: four to the intervention group; and four to treatment-as-usual only. Four significant others participated alongside the randomised participants. Recruitment to the study was very low and centres only screened 466 hearing aid users over the 15-month recruitment period, compared with the approximately 3500 anticipated. Only one ACE group and one control group were formed. ACE could be delivered and appeared acceptable to participants. We were unable to robustly assess attrition and attendance rates due to the low sample size. CONCLUSIONS: While ACE appeared acceptable to hearing aid users and feasible to deliver, it was not feasible to identify and recruit participants struggling with their hearing aids at the 3-month posthearing aid fitting point. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN28090877. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8031014/ /pubmed/33827834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043364 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Watson, Judith
Coleman, Elizabeth
Jackson, Cath
Bell, Kerry
Maynard, Christina
Hickson, Louise
Forster, Anne
Fairhurst, Caroline
Hewitt, Catherine
Gardner, Rob
Iley, Kate
Gailey, Lorraine
Thyer, Nicholas J
Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
title Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
title_full Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
title_fullStr Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
title_short Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)
title_sort randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ace to hear)
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8031014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043364
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonjudith randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT colemanelizabeth randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT jacksoncath randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT bellkerry randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT maynardchristina randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT hicksonlouise randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT forsteranne randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT fairhurstcaroline randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT hewittcatherine randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT gardnerrob randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT ileykate randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT gaileylorraine randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear
AT thyernicholasj randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofanactivecommunicationeducationprogrammeplushearingaidprovisionversushearingaidprovisionaloneacetohear