Cargando…
Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
BACKGROUND: Emergent cardiac catheterization laboratory activation (CCLA) for patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is employed to expedite acute revascularization (AR). The incidence of false-positive CCLA, in which AR is not performed, remains high. The combination of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000920 |
_version_ | 1783676188954198016 |
---|---|
author | Puleo, Peter Salen, Philip Manda, Yugandhar Vefali, Huseng Agrawal, Sahil Quddus, Abdullah Branch, Kevin Shoemaker, Melinda Stoltzfus, Jill |
author_facet | Puleo, Peter Salen, Philip Manda, Yugandhar Vefali, Huseng Agrawal, Sahil Quddus, Abdullah Branch, Kevin Shoemaker, Melinda Stoltzfus, Jill |
author_sort | Puleo, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergent cardiac catheterization laboratory activation (CCLA) for patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is employed to expedite acute revascularization (AR). The incidence of false-positive CCLA, in which AR is not performed, remains high. The combination of chest pain (CP) and electrocardiographic ST elevation (STE) are the hallmarks of STEMI. However, CCLA is sometimes initiated for patients lacking this combination. The study objective was to quantify the difference in likelihood of AR and mortality in patients with vs. without both CP and STE. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1621 consecutive patients for whom CCLA was initiated in a six-hospital network. We assessed the likelihood of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), presence of a culprit lesion (CL), performance of AR, and hospital mortality among patients with both CP and STE (+CP/+STE) compared with patients lacking one or both [non(CP/STE)]. RESULTS: 87.0% of patients presented with CP, 82.4% with STE, and 73.7% with both. Among +CP/+STE patients, AMI was confirmed in 90.4%, a CL in 88.9%, and AR performed in 83.1%. The corresponding values among non(CP/STE) patients were 35.8, 31.9, and 28.1%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for each). Nevertheless, mortality among non(CP/STE) patients was three-fold higher than in +CP/+STE patients (13.3% vs. 4.5%; P < 0.0001), with non-coronary deaths 24-fold more likely. CONCLUSION: Patients lacking the combination of CP and STE have a markedly lower likelihood of AMI and AR than +CP/+STE patients, but significantly higher mortality. Protocols aimed at rapid, focused evaluation of non(CP/STE) patients prior to CCLA are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8032215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80322152021-04-09 Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation Puleo, Peter Salen, Philip Manda, Yugandhar Vefali, Huseng Agrawal, Sahil Quddus, Abdullah Branch, Kevin Shoemaker, Melinda Stoltzfus, Jill Coron Artery Dis Myocardial Infarction BACKGROUND: Emergent cardiac catheterization laboratory activation (CCLA) for patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is employed to expedite acute revascularization (AR). The incidence of false-positive CCLA, in which AR is not performed, remains high. The combination of chest pain (CP) and electrocardiographic ST elevation (STE) are the hallmarks of STEMI. However, CCLA is sometimes initiated for patients lacking this combination. The study objective was to quantify the difference in likelihood of AR and mortality in patients with vs. without both CP and STE. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1621 consecutive patients for whom CCLA was initiated in a six-hospital network. We assessed the likelihood of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), presence of a culprit lesion (CL), performance of AR, and hospital mortality among patients with both CP and STE (+CP/+STE) compared with patients lacking one or both [non(CP/STE)]. RESULTS: 87.0% of patients presented with CP, 82.4% with STE, and 73.7% with both. Among +CP/+STE patients, AMI was confirmed in 90.4%, a CL in 88.9%, and AR performed in 83.1%. The corresponding values among non(CP/STE) patients were 35.8, 31.9, and 28.1%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for each). Nevertheless, mortality among non(CP/STE) patients was three-fold higher than in +CP/+STE patients (13.3% vs. 4.5%; P < 0.0001), with non-coronary deaths 24-fold more likely. CONCLUSION: Patients lacking the combination of CP and STE have a markedly lower likelihood of AMI and AR than +CP/+STE patients, but significantly higher mortality. Protocols aimed at rapid, focused evaluation of non(CP/STE) patients prior to CCLA are needed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-06-11 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8032215/ /pubmed/32541211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000920 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CC-BY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Myocardial Infarction Puleo, Peter Salen, Philip Manda, Yugandhar Vefali, Huseng Agrawal, Sahil Quddus, Abdullah Branch, Kevin Shoemaker, Melinda Stoltzfus, Jill Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation |
title | Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation |
title_full | Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation |
title_fullStr | Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation |
title_full_unstemmed | Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation |
title_short | Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation |
title_sort | likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and st elevation |
topic | Myocardial Infarction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puleopeter likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT salenphilip likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT mandayugandhar likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT vefalihuseng likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT agrawalsahil likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT quddusabdullah likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT branchkevin likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT shoemakermelinda likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation AT stoltzfusjill likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation |