Cargando…

Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation

BACKGROUND: Emergent cardiac catheterization laboratory activation (CCLA) for patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is employed to expedite acute revascularization (AR). The incidence of false-positive CCLA, in which AR is not performed, remains high. The combination of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puleo, Peter, Salen, Philip, Manda, Yugandhar, Vefali, Huseng, Agrawal, Sahil, Quddus, Abdullah, Branch, Kevin, Shoemaker, Melinda, Stoltzfus, Jill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000920
_version_ 1783676188954198016
author Puleo, Peter
Salen, Philip
Manda, Yugandhar
Vefali, Huseng
Agrawal, Sahil
Quddus, Abdullah
Branch, Kevin
Shoemaker, Melinda
Stoltzfus, Jill
author_facet Puleo, Peter
Salen, Philip
Manda, Yugandhar
Vefali, Huseng
Agrawal, Sahil
Quddus, Abdullah
Branch, Kevin
Shoemaker, Melinda
Stoltzfus, Jill
author_sort Puleo, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergent cardiac catheterization laboratory activation (CCLA) for patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is employed to expedite acute revascularization (AR). The incidence of false-positive CCLA, in which AR is not performed, remains high. The combination of chest pain (CP) and electrocardiographic ST elevation (STE) are the hallmarks of STEMI. However, CCLA is sometimes initiated for patients lacking this combination. The study objective was to quantify the difference in likelihood of AR and mortality in patients with vs. without both CP and STE. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1621 consecutive patients for whom CCLA was initiated in a six-hospital network. We assessed the likelihood of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), presence of a culprit lesion (CL), performance of AR, and hospital mortality among patients with both CP and STE (+CP/+STE) compared with patients lacking one or both [non(CP/STE)]. RESULTS: 87.0% of patients presented with CP, 82.4% with STE, and 73.7% with both. Among +CP/+STE patients, AMI was confirmed in 90.4%, a CL in 88.9%, and AR performed in 83.1%. The corresponding values among non(CP/STE) patients were 35.8, 31.9, and 28.1%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for each). Nevertheless, mortality among non(CP/STE) patients was three-fold higher than in +CP/+STE patients (13.3% vs. 4.5%; P < 0.0001), with non-coronary deaths 24-fold more likely. CONCLUSION: Patients lacking the combination of CP and STE have a markedly lower likelihood of AMI and AR than +CP/+STE patients, but significantly higher mortality. Protocols aimed at rapid, focused evaluation of non(CP/STE) patients prior to CCLA are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8032215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80322152021-04-09 Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation Puleo, Peter Salen, Philip Manda, Yugandhar Vefali, Huseng Agrawal, Sahil Quddus, Abdullah Branch, Kevin Shoemaker, Melinda Stoltzfus, Jill Coron Artery Dis Myocardial Infarction BACKGROUND: Emergent cardiac catheterization laboratory activation (CCLA) for patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is employed to expedite acute revascularization (AR). The incidence of false-positive CCLA, in which AR is not performed, remains high. The combination of chest pain (CP) and electrocardiographic ST elevation (STE) are the hallmarks of STEMI. However, CCLA is sometimes initiated for patients lacking this combination. The study objective was to quantify the difference in likelihood of AR and mortality in patients with vs. without both CP and STE. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1621 consecutive patients for whom CCLA was initiated in a six-hospital network. We assessed the likelihood of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), presence of a culprit lesion (CL), performance of AR, and hospital mortality among patients with both CP and STE (+CP/+STE) compared with patients lacking one or both [non(CP/STE)]. RESULTS: 87.0% of patients presented with CP, 82.4% with STE, and 73.7% with both. Among +CP/+STE patients, AMI was confirmed in 90.4%, a CL in 88.9%, and AR performed in 83.1%. The corresponding values among non(CP/STE) patients were 35.8, 31.9, and 28.1%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for each). Nevertheless, mortality among non(CP/STE) patients was three-fold higher than in +CP/+STE patients (13.3% vs. 4.5%; P < 0.0001), with non-coronary deaths 24-fold more likely. CONCLUSION: Patients lacking the combination of CP and STE have a markedly lower likelihood of AMI and AR than +CP/+STE patients, but significantly higher mortality. Protocols aimed at rapid, focused evaluation of non(CP/STE) patients prior to CCLA are needed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-06-11 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8032215/ /pubmed/32541211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000920 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CC-BY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Myocardial Infarction
Puleo, Peter
Salen, Philip
Manda, Yugandhar
Vefali, Huseng
Agrawal, Sahil
Quddus, Abdullah
Branch, Kevin
Shoemaker, Melinda
Stoltzfus, Jill
Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
title Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
title_full Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
title_fullStr Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
title_full_unstemmed Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
title_short Likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and ST elevation
title_sort likelihood of myocardial infarction, revascularization and death following catheterization laboratory activation in patients with vs. without both chest pain and st elevation
topic Myocardial Infarction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000920
work_keys_str_mv AT puleopeter likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT salenphilip likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT mandayugandhar likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT vefalihuseng likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT agrawalsahil likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT quddusabdullah likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT branchkevin likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT shoemakermelinda likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation
AT stoltzfusjill likelihoodofmyocardialinfarctionrevascularizationanddeathfollowingcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationinpatientswithvswithoutbothchestpainandstelevation