Cargando…
Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy
INTRODUCTION: Vaccine hesitancy and delays in vaccine administration time have limited the success of prior influenza vaccination initiatives in the pediatric emergency department (ED). In 2018–2019, season 1, this ED implemented mandatory vaccine screening and offered the vaccine to all eligible pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000430 |
_version_ | 1783676202606657536 |
---|---|
author | Baumer-Mouradian, Shannon H. Servi, Ashley Kleinschmidt, Abigail Nimmer, Mark Lazarevic, Kimberly Hanson, Thomas Jastrow, Jena Jaworski, Brian Kopetsky, Matthew Drendel, Amy L. |
author_facet | Baumer-Mouradian, Shannon H. Servi, Ashley Kleinschmidt, Abigail Nimmer, Mark Lazarevic, Kimberly Hanson, Thomas Jastrow, Jena Jaworski, Brian Kopetsky, Matthew Drendel, Amy L. |
author_sort | Baumer-Mouradian, Shannon H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Vaccine hesitancy and delays in vaccine administration time have limited the success of prior influenza vaccination initiatives in the pediatric emergency department (ED). In 2018–2019, season 1, this ED implemented mandatory vaccine screening and offered the vaccine to all eligible patients; however, only 9% of the eligible population received the vaccine. In 2019–2020, season 2, the team sought to improve influenza vaccination rates from 9% to 15% and administer over 2,000 vaccines to eligible ED patients. METHODS: Key drivers included: identifying vaccine hesitancy, providing counseling, reducing administration delays, and developing reminders for vaccine administration. We tested interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles. We included discharged ED patients, age 6 months–18 years old, emergency severity index score 2–5, and no prior vaccine this season. Process measures included percent of patients screened, eligible, accepting the vaccine, and leaving before vaccination. Outcome measures were the percent of eligible patients vaccinated and the total number of vaccines administered. Vaccination time was the balancing measure. RESULTS: We included 57,804 children in this study. Comparing season 1 to 2, screening rates (84%) and eligibility rates (58%) were similar. Vaccine acceptance rates improved from 13% to 22%, the proportion of patients leaving before vaccination decreased from 32% to 17%, and vaccination rates improved from 9% to 20%. Total vaccines administered increased from 1,309 to 3,180, and vaccination time was 5 minutes faster in season 2. CONCLUSIONS: This ED influenza vaccination process provides a model to overcome vaccine hesitancy and can be adapted and replicated for any vaccine-preventable illness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8032353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80323532021-04-13 Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy Baumer-Mouradian, Shannon H. Servi, Ashley Kleinschmidt, Abigail Nimmer, Mark Lazarevic, Kimberly Hanson, Thomas Jastrow, Jena Jaworski, Brian Kopetsky, Matthew Drendel, Amy L. Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI projects from single institutions INTRODUCTION: Vaccine hesitancy and delays in vaccine administration time have limited the success of prior influenza vaccination initiatives in the pediatric emergency department (ED). In 2018–2019, season 1, this ED implemented mandatory vaccine screening and offered the vaccine to all eligible patients; however, only 9% of the eligible population received the vaccine. In 2019–2020, season 2, the team sought to improve influenza vaccination rates from 9% to 15% and administer over 2,000 vaccines to eligible ED patients. METHODS: Key drivers included: identifying vaccine hesitancy, providing counseling, reducing administration delays, and developing reminders for vaccine administration. We tested interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles. We included discharged ED patients, age 6 months–18 years old, emergency severity index score 2–5, and no prior vaccine this season. Process measures included percent of patients screened, eligible, accepting the vaccine, and leaving before vaccination. Outcome measures were the percent of eligible patients vaccinated and the total number of vaccines administered. Vaccination time was the balancing measure. RESULTS: We included 57,804 children in this study. Comparing season 1 to 2, screening rates (84%) and eligibility rates (58%) were similar. Vaccine acceptance rates improved from 13% to 22%, the proportion of patients leaving before vaccination decreased from 32% to 17%, and vaccination rates improved from 9% to 20%. Total vaccines administered increased from 1,309 to 3,180, and vaccination time was 5 minutes faster in season 2. CONCLUSIONS: This ED influenza vaccination process provides a model to overcome vaccine hesitancy and can be adapted and replicated for any vaccine-preventable illness. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8032353/ /pubmed/33855251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000430 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Individual QI projects from single institutions Baumer-Mouradian, Shannon H. Servi, Ashley Kleinschmidt, Abigail Nimmer, Mark Lazarevic, Kimberly Hanson, Thomas Jastrow, Jena Jaworski, Brian Kopetsky, Matthew Drendel, Amy L. Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy |
title | Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy |
title_full | Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy |
title_fullStr | Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy |
title_short | Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy |
title_sort | vaccinating in the emergency department, a model to overcome influenza vaccine hesitancy |
topic | Individual QI projects from single institutions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumermouradianshannonh vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT serviashley vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT kleinschmidtabigail vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT nimmermark vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT lazarevickimberly vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT hansonthomas vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT jastrowjena vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT jaworskibrian vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT kopetskymatthew vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy AT drendelamyl vaccinatingintheemergencydepartmentamodeltoovercomeinfluenzavaccinehesitancy |