Cargando…

Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor

Field calibrations of NO(2), NO, and PM(10) from AQMesh Air Quality Monitors (AQMs) were conducted during a summer and an autumn period in a busy street in a midsize Swedish city. All the three linear calibration procedures studied (postscaled, bisquare, and orthogonal data) significantly reduced th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahlborg, Dan, Björling, Mikael, Mattsson, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x
_version_ 1783676250644021248
author Wahlborg, Dan
Björling, Mikael
Mattsson, Magnus
author_facet Wahlborg, Dan
Björling, Mikael
Mattsson, Magnus
author_sort Wahlborg, Dan
collection PubMed
description Field calibrations of NO(2), NO, and PM(10) from AQMesh Air Quality Monitors (AQMs) were conducted during a summer and an autumn period in a busy street in a midsize Swedish city. All the three linear calibration procedures studied (postscaled, bisquare, and orthogonal data) significantly reduced the ranges and magnitudes of the performance indicators to yield more reliable results than the raw data. The improvements were sufficient to satisfy the European Union (EU) Data Quality Objective (DQO) for indicative measurements as compared to reference data only for NO(2) (above 50 µg m(−3)) and NO (above 30 µg m(−3)) during the autumn calibration period. The relatively simple bisquare procedure had the best performance overall. The bisquare procedure improved the root mean square error by the same amount as other studies using complex multivariate calibration methods. Low concentrations of pollutants were measured, far below the EU Environmental Quality Standard thresholds and even satisfying the future goals for the Environmental Quality Objectives. Cleaning the raw data by removing data points in the reference data that were below the reference station limit of detections (and the synchronous data points in the AQM prescaled data) was found to improve the performances of the calibration procedures appreciably. Many NO(2) and almost all PM(10) data points in this study fell below the AQM limit of detection. These low concentrations will probably be a common problem in many field studies, at least in areas with relatively low air pollution. However, the relative errors were sufficiently low for these data points that they could be interpreted as accurately representing low concentrations and did not need to be removed from the datasets. For the NO(2) measurements, a slight periodic error correlated with sunlight and increased ambient temperature was noted. NO measurements correlated strongly with increased traffic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8032644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80326442021-04-27 Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor Wahlborg, Dan Björling, Mikael Mattsson, Magnus Environ Monit Assess Article Field calibrations of NO(2), NO, and PM(10) from AQMesh Air Quality Monitors (AQMs) were conducted during a summer and an autumn period in a busy street in a midsize Swedish city. All the three linear calibration procedures studied (postscaled, bisquare, and orthogonal data) significantly reduced the ranges and magnitudes of the performance indicators to yield more reliable results than the raw data. The improvements were sufficient to satisfy the European Union (EU) Data Quality Objective (DQO) for indicative measurements as compared to reference data only for NO(2) (above 50 µg m(−3)) and NO (above 30 µg m(−3)) during the autumn calibration period. The relatively simple bisquare procedure had the best performance overall. The bisquare procedure improved the root mean square error by the same amount as other studies using complex multivariate calibration methods. Low concentrations of pollutants were measured, far below the EU Environmental Quality Standard thresholds and even satisfying the future goals for the Environmental Quality Objectives. Cleaning the raw data by removing data points in the reference data that were below the reference station limit of detections (and the synchronous data points in the AQM prescaled data) was found to improve the performances of the calibration procedures appreciably. Many NO(2) and almost all PM(10) data points in this study fell below the AQM limit of detection. These low concentrations will probably be a common problem in many field studies, at least in areas with relatively low air pollution. However, the relative errors were sufficiently low for these data points that they could be interpreted as accurately representing low concentrations and did not need to be removed from the datasets. For the NO(2) measurements, a slight periodic error correlated with sunlight and increased ambient temperature was noted. NO measurements correlated strongly with increased traffic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8032644/ /pubmed/33834306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wahlborg, Dan
Björling, Mikael
Mattsson, Magnus
Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
title Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
title_full Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
title_fullStr Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
title_short Evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of AQMesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
title_sort evaluation of field calibration methods and performance of aqmesh, a low-cost air quality monitor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09033-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wahlborgdan evaluationoffieldcalibrationmethodsandperformanceofaqmeshalowcostairqualitymonitor
AT bjorlingmikael evaluationoffieldcalibrationmethodsandperformanceofaqmeshalowcostairqualitymonitor
AT mattssonmagnus evaluationoffieldcalibrationmethodsandperformanceofaqmeshalowcostairqualitymonitor