Cargando…

Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach

The feasibility and surgical effort of a pre-lacrimal window approach (PLWA) depends on the width of the bony window anterior to the nasolacrimal duct. This study aimed to investigate gender-specific differences in feasibility of PLWA. A consecutive series of paranasal computed tomography scans from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrianakis, A., Moser, U., Wolf, A., Kiss, P., Holzmeister, C., Andrianakis, D., Tomazic, P. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87447-w
_version_ 1783676257176649728
author Andrianakis, A.
Moser, U.
Wolf, A.
Kiss, P.
Holzmeister, C.
Andrianakis, D.
Tomazic, P. V.
author_facet Andrianakis, A.
Moser, U.
Wolf, A.
Kiss, P.
Holzmeister, C.
Andrianakis, D.
Tomazic, P. V.
author_sort Andrianakis, A.
collection PubMed
description The feasibility and surgical effort of a pre-lacrimal window approach (PLWA) depends on the width of the bony window anterior to the nasolacrimal duct. This study aimed to investigate gender-specific differences in feasibility of PLWA. A consecutive series of paranasal computed tomography scans from 50 females (n = 100) and 50 males (n = 100) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the antero-posterior length of the bony pre-lacrimal window (BPLWA). The secondary outcome measure was the distribution of Simmen’s PLWA feasibility types (major, moderate and minor surgical effort). On average, males had a 1.5 mm (95% CI 0.8–2.2) significantly higher BPLW length in comparison to females [t(198) = 4.4, p < 0.0001]. The requirement of major surgical effort occurred 29% more frequently in females [χ(2)(1) = 17.7, p < 0.0001], whereas the necessity of moderate surgical effort was 21% more prevalent in males [χ(2)(1) = 8.8, p = 0.003]. The need of only minor surgical effort was twice as high in males compared to females [χ(2)(1) = 3, p = 0.081]. Our data indicates that females require more significant surgical effort during a PLWA to gain access to the maxillary sinus. These results are highly informative as a high amount of bone removal and nasolacrimal duct dislocation are associated with a higher likelihood of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8032672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80326722021-04-09 Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach Andrianakis, A. Moser, U. Wolf, A. Kiss, P. Holzmeister, C. Andrianakis, D. Tomazic, P. V. Sci Rep Article The feasibility and surgical effort of a pre-lacrimal window approach (PLWA) depends on the width of the bony window anterior to the nasolacrimal duct. This study aimed to investigate gender-specific differences in feasibility of PLWA. A consecutive series of paranasal computed tomography scans from 50 females (n = 100) and 50 males (n = 100) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the antero-posterior length of the bony pre-lacrimal window (BPLWA). The secondary outcome measure was the distribution of Simmen’s PLWA feasibility types (major, moderate and minor surgical effort). On average, males had a 1.5 mm (95% CI 0.8–2.2) significantly higher BPLW length in comparison to females [t(198) = 4.4, p < 0.0001]. The requirement of major surgical effort occurred 29% more frequently in females [χ(2)(1) = 17.7, p < 0.0001], whereas the necessity of moderate surgical effort was 21% more prevalent in males [χ(2)(1) = 8.8, p = 0.003]. The need of only minor surgical effort was twice as high in males compared to females [χ(2)(1) = 3, p = 0.081]. Our data indicates that females require more significant surgical effort during a PLWA to gain access to the maxillary sinus. These results are highly informative as a high amount of bone removal and nasolacrimal duct dislocation are associated with a higher likelihood of complications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8032672/ /pubmed/33833353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87447-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Andrianakis, A.
Moser, U.
Wolf, A.
Kiss, P.
Holzmeister, C.
Andrianakis, D.
Tomazic, P. V.
Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
title Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
title_full Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
title_fullStr Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
title_full_unstemmed Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
title_short Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
title_sort gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33833353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87447-w
work_keys_str_mv AT andrianakisa genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach
AT moseru genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach
AT wolfa genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach
AT kissp genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach
AT holzmeisterc genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach
AT andrianakisd genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach
AT tomazicpv genderspecificdifferencesinfeasibilityofprelacrimalwindowapproach