Cargando…

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content

Recently, some studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces dual-task interference. Since there are countless combinations of dual-tasks, it remains unclear whether stable effects by tDCS can be observed on dual-task interference. An aim of the present study was to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimura, Takehide, Kaneko, Fuminari, Nagamine, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.653713
_version_ 1783676299193090048
author Kimura, Takehide
Kaneko, Fuminari
Nagamine, Takashi
author_facet Kimura, Takehide
Kaneko, Fuminari
Nagamine, Takashi
author_sort Kimura, Takehide
collection PubMed
description Recently, some studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces dual-task interference. Since there are countless combinations of dual-tasks, it remains unclear whether stable effects by tDCS can be observed on dual-task interference. An aim of the present study was to investigate whether the effects of tDCS on dual-task interference change depend on the dual-task content. We adopted two combinations of dual-tasks, i.e., a word task while performing a tandem task (word-tandem dual-task) and a classic Stroop task while performing a tandem task (Stroop-tandem dual-task). We expected that the Stroop task would recruit the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and require involvement of executive function to greater extent than the word task. Subsequently, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over the DLPFC would improve executive function and result in more effective reduction of dual-task interference in the Stroop-tandem dual-task than in the word-tandem dual-task. Anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the DLPFC or the supplementary motor area using a constant current of 2.0 mA for 20 min. According to our results, dual-task interference and the task performances of each task under the single-task condition were not changed after applying any settings of tDCS. However, anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC significantly improved the word task performance immediately after tDCS under the dual-task condition. Our findings suggested that the effect of anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC varies on the task performance under the dual-task condition was changed depending on the dual-task content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8032873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80328732021-04-10 The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content Kimura, Takehide Kaneko, Fuminari Nagamine, Takashi Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Recently, some studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces dual-task interference. Since there are countless combinations of dual-tasks, it remains unclear whether stable effects by tDCS can be observed on dual-task interference. An aim of the present study was to investigate whether the effects of tDCS on dual-task interference change depend on the dual-task content. We adopted two combinations of dual-tasks, i.e., a word task while performing a tandem task (word-tandem dual-task) and a classic Stroop task while performing a tandem task (Stroop-tandem dual-task). We expected that the Stroop task would recruit the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and require involvement of executive function to greater extent than the word task. Subsequently, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over the DLPFC would improve executive function and result in more effective reduction of dual-task interference in the Stroop-tandem dual-task than in the word-tandem dual-task. Anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the DLPFC or the supplementary motor area using a constant current of 2.0 mA for 20 min. According to our results, dual-task interference and the task performances of each task under the single-task condition were not changed after applying any settings of tDCS. However, anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC significantly improved the word task performance immediately after tDCS under the dual-task condition. Our findings suggested that the effect of anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC varies on the task performance under the dual-task condition was changed depending on the dual-task content. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8032873/ /pubmed/33841121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.653713 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kimura, Kaneko and Nagamine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kimura, Takehide
Kaneko, Fuminari
Nagamine, Takashi
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content
title The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content
title_full The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content
title_fullStr The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content
title_short The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dual-Task Interference Depend on the Dual-Task Content
title_sort effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on dual-task interference depend on the dual-task content
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.653713
work_keys_str_mv AT kimuratakehide theeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondualtaskinterferencedependonthedualtaskcontent
AT kanekofuminari theeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondualtaskinterferencedependonthedualtaskcontent
AT nagaminetakashi theeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondualtaskinterferencedependonthedualtaskcontent
AT kimuratakehide effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondualtaskinterferencedependonthedualtaskcontent
AT kanekofuminari effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondualtaskinterferencedependonthedualtaskcontent
AT nagaminetakashi effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationondualtaskinterferencedependonthedualtaskcontent