Cargando…

Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity

BACKGROUND: Inhomogeneous intra-atrial conduction facilitates both initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is reflected in electrogram (EGM) morphology. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to investigate regional differences in features of different EGM types during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Ziliang, van Schie, Mathijs S., de Groot, Natasja M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.652128
_version_ 1783676332782125056
author Ye, Ziliang
van Schie, Mathijs S.
de Groot, Natasja M. S.
author_facet Ye, Ziliang
van Schie, Mathijs S.
de Groot, Natasja M. S.
author_sort Ye, Ziliang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhomogeneous intra-atrial conduction facilitates both initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is reflected in electrogram (EGM) morphology. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to investigate regional differences in features of different EGM types during sinus rhythm (SR) and to design a patient-specific signal fingerprint, which quantifies the severity and extensiveness of inhomogeneity in conduction. METHODS: Patients (N = 189, 86% male; mean age 65 ± 9 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) underwent high-resolution mapping of the right atrium (RA), left atrium (LA), and pulmonary vein area (PVA) including Bachmann’s bundle (BB). EGMs during 5 s of SR were classified as single potentials (SPs), short double potentials (SDPs, interval between deflections < 15 ms), long double potentials (LDPs, deflection interval > 15 ms), or fractionated potentials (FPs, ≥3 deflections). Of all SPs, differences in relative R- and S-wave amplitude were calculated (R/S ratios). Time difference between first and last deflection was determined (fractionation duration, FD) and potentials with amplitudes < 1.0 mV were labeled as low-voltage. Conduction block (CB) was defined as a difference in local activation time (LAT) between adjacent electrodes of ≥12 ms. RESULTS: A total of 1,763,593 EGMs (9,331 ± 3,336 per patient) were classified (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The signal fingerprint, consisting of quantified EGM features, including the R/S ratio of SPs, the relative frequency distribution of unipolar voltages, the proportion of low-voltage areas, the proportion of the different types of EGMs, and durations of LDP and FDP, may serve as a diagnostic tool to determine the severity and extensiveness of conduction inhomogeneity. Further studies are required to determine whether the signal fingerprint can be used to identify patients at risk for AF onset or progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8033016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80330162021-04-10 Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity Ye, Ziliang van Schie, Mathijs S. de Groot, Natasja M. S. Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: Inhomogeneous intra-atrial conduction facilitates both initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is reflected in electrogram (EGM) morphology. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to investigate regional differences in features of different EGM types during sinus rhythm (SR) and to design a patient-specific signal fingerprint, which quantifies the severity and extensiveness of inhomogeneity in conduction. METHODS: Patients (N = 189, 86% male; mean age 65 ± 9 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) underwent high-resolution mapping of the right atrium (RA), left atrium (LA), and pulmonary vein area (PVA) including Bachmann’s bundle (BB). EGMs during 5 s of SR were classified as single potentials (SPs), short double potentials (SDPs, interval between deflections < 15 ms), long double potentials (LDPs, deflection interval > 15 ms), or fractionated potentials (FPs, ≥3 deflections). Of all SPs, differences in relative R- and S-wave amplitude were calculated (R/S ratios). Time difference between first and last deflection was determined (fractionation duration, FD) and potentials with amplitudes < 1.0 mV were labeled as low-voltage. Conduction block (CB) was defined as a difference in local activation time (LAT) between adjacent electrodes of ≥12 ms. RESULTS: A total of 1,763,593 EGMs (9,331 ± 3,336 per patient) were classified (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The signal fingerprint, consisting of quantified EGM features, including the R/S ratio of SPs, the relative frequency distribution of unipolar voltages, the proportion of low-voltage areas, the proportion of the different types of EGMs, and durations of LDP and FDP, may serve as a diagnostic tool to determine the severity and extensiveness of conduction inhomogeneity. Further studies are required to determine whether the signal fingerprint can be used to identify patients at risk for AF onset or progression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8033016/ /pubmed/33841188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.652128 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ye, van Schie and de Groot. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Ye, Ziliang
van Schie, Mathijs S.
de Groot, Natasja M. S.
Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_full Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_fullStr Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_full_unstemmed Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_short Signal Fingerprinting as a Novel Diagnostic Tool to Identify Conduction Inhomogeneity
title_sort signal fingerprinting as a novel diagnostic tool to identify conduction inhomogeneity
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33841188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.652128
work_keys_str_mv AT yeziliang signalfingerprintingasanoveldiagnostictooltoidentifyconductioninhomogeneity
AT vanschiemathijss signalfingerprintingasanoveldiagnostictooltoidentifyconductioninhomogeneity
AT degrootnatasjams signalfingerprintingasanoveldiagnostictooltoidentifyconductioninhomogeneity