Cargando…

Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND: Placebo and nocebo responses have been increasingly gaining the attention of clinical and scientific researchers. Inconsistent conclusions from current studies indicate that different factors potentially affect both placebo and nocebo responses. Increasing evidence suggests that personal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Yu, Wang, Yaping, Zeng, Yanyan, Zhan, Hongrui, Huang, Shimin, Cai, Guiyuan, Yang, Jianming, Wu, Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842592
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5123
_version_ 1783676396213633024
author Shi, Yu
Wang, Yaping
Zeng, Yanyan
Zhan, Hongrui
Huang, Shimin
Cai, Guiyuan
Yang, Jianming
Wu, Wen
author_facet Shi, Yu
Wang, Yaping
Zeng, Yanyan
Zhan, Hongrui
Huang, Shimin
Cai, Guiyuan
Yang, Jianming
Wu, Wen
author_sort Shi, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Placebo and nocebo responses have been increasingly gaining the attention of clinical and scientific researchers. Inconsistent conclusions from current studies indicate that different factors potentially affect both placebo and nocebo responses. Increasing evidence suggests that personality differences may affect the mechanisms of both two responses. In the present work, we explored the characteristics of neural signals of placebo and nocebo responses based on functional connectivity (FC) analysis and Granger causality analysis (GCA). METHODS: A total of 34 healthy participants received conditional induction training to establish placebo and nocebo responses. Every participant completed the following experimental workflow, including scanning of baseline, experimental low back pain model establishment, scanning of acute pain status, and scanning of placebo response or nocebo response. We collect visual analogue scale (VAS) data after each scanning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from different personality groups were subjected to FC analysis and multivariate GCA (mGCA). RESULTS: Pain scores for placebo and nocebo responses were statistically different across different personality. There are also statistically differences in the neural signals of two responses across different personality. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study indicated that extroverted and introverted participants are likely to experience placebo analgesic effects and nocebo hyperalgesia effects, respectively. Both extroverted and introverted participants showed significant changes in brain networks under placebo response. Variation in emotional control and ventromedial prefrontal cortex inactivity may constitute the bulk of the personality differences in placebo analgesia. Differences in the regulation of the sensory conduction system (SCS) and release of the emotional circuit could be important factors affecting personality differences in nocebo hyperalgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8033354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80333542021-04-09 Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study Shi, Yu Wang, Yaping Zeng, Yanyan Zhan, Hongrui Huang, Shimin Cai, Guiyuan Yang, Jianming Wu, Wen Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Placebo and nocebo responses have been increasingly gaining the attention of clinical and scientific researchers. Inconsistent conclusions from current studies indicate that different factors potentially affect both placebo and nocebo responses. Increasing evidence suggests that personality differences may affect the mechanisms of both two responses. In the present work, we explored the characteristics of neural signals of placebo and nocebo responses based on functional connectivity (FC) analysis and Granger causality analysis (GCA). METHODS: A total of 34 healthy participants received conditional induction training to establish placebo and nocebo responses. Every participant completed the following experimental workflow, including scanning of baseline, experimental low back pain model establishment, scanning of acute pain status, and scanning of placebo response or nocebo response. We collect visual analogue scale (VAS) data after each scanning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from different personality groups were subjected to FC analysis and multivariate GCA (mGCA). RESULTS: Pain scores for placebo and nocebo responses were statistically different across different personality. There are also statistically differences in the neural signals of two responses across different personality. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study indicated that extroverted and introverted participants are likely to experience placebo analgesic effects and nocebo hyperalgesia effects, respectively. Both extroverted and introverted participants showed significant changes in brain networks under placebo response. Variation in emotional control and ventromedial prefrontal cortex inactivity may constitute the bulk of the personality differences in placebo analgesia. Differences in the regulation of the sensory conduction system (SCS) and release of the emotional circuit could be important factors affecting personality differences in nocebo hyperalgesia. AME Publishing Company 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8033354/ /pubmed/33842592 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5123 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Shi, Yu
Wang, Yaping
Zeng, Yanyan
Zhan, Hongrui
Huang, Shimin
Cai, Guiyuan
Yang, Jianming
Wu, Wen
Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
title Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
title_full Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
title_fullStr Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
title_full_unstemmed Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
title_short Personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
title_sort personality differences in brain network mechanisms for placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in experimental pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842592
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5123
work_keys_str_mv AT shiyu personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT wangyaping personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT zengyanyan personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT zhanhongrui personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT huangshimin personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT caiguiyuan personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT yangjianming personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT wuwen personalitydifferencesinbrainnetworkmechanismsforplaceboanalgesiaandnocebohyperalgesiainexperimentalpainafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy