Cargando…
Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis
BACKGROUND: With the popularization of knee replacement surgery in the treatment of the advanced lesions of knee joint, the amount of knee revision surgery is increasing unceasingly. Meanwhile, the continuous introduction of new clinical concepts and new technology poses a challenge to researchers a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842609 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3969 |
_version_ | 1783676403454050304 |
---|---|
author | Zhai, Kelei Ma, Weifeng Huang, Tao |
author_facet | Zhai, Kelei Ma, Weifeng Huang, Tao |
author_sort | Zhai, Kelei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the popularization of knee replacement surgery in the treatment of the advanced lesions of knee joint, the amount of knee revision surgery is increasing unceasingly. Meanwhile, the continuous introduction of new clinical concepts and new technology poses a challenge to researchers and surgeons. Our study aims to inform the future scientific research and clinical treatment, by investigating the hot spots and trends of the knee revision research field with the method of bibliometric analysis. METHODS: Publications on knee revision included in the database of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed and MeSH terms of them were extracted from PubMed. Online bibliometric analysis website (http://bibliometric.com/), two pieces of software called “CiteSpace” and “Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder” (BICOMB) were used to analyze the publications reviewed at quantitative level. Another piece of software called “gCLUTO”, was used to investigate the hot spots with visualization techniques at qualitative level. RESULTS: A total of 906 publications were retrieved between 2000 and 2018. There is an increasing number of publications, from 15 in 2000 to 86 in 2018. Journal of Arthroplasty is the leading journal which has the most publications on knee revision. The United States has been the biggest contributor. Mayo Clinic became the leader among the institutions which have conducted correlational researches. David G. Lewallen, Robert L. Barrack and Michael A. Mont should be regarded as the scholars who have made outstanding contribution. Hot spots were summed up in six clusters, respectively, the solutions for infection, prostheses, the adverse effects, the surgical techniques, epidemiological characters, and the pathophysiology of the revision knee. CONCLUSIONS: We found a growing trend in knee revision research and extracted the most contributive researchers, institutions, countries, journals, and most-cited articles worldwide. The solutions for complications, surgical applications and analysis for epidemiological characters have been the hot spots. Multi-disciplinary integration is becoming the time-trend of hot spots. Minimally invasive and navigation are directions of revision surgery. They together constitute a solid foundation and set up a fingerpost for the future scientific research and clinical treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8033385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80333852021-04-09 Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis Zhai, Kelei Ma, Weifeng Huang, Tao Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: With the popularization of knee replacement surgery in the treatment of the advanced lesions of knee joint, the amount of knee revision surgery is increasing unceasingly. Meanwhile, the continuous introduction of new clinical concepts and new technology poses a challenge to researchers and surgeons. Our study aims to inform the future scientific research and clinical treatment, by investigating the hot spots and trends of the knee revision research field with the method of bibliometric analysis. METHODS: Publications on knee revision included in the database of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed and MeSH terms of them were extracted from PubMed. Online bibliometric analysis website (http://bibliometric.com/), two pieces of software called “CiteSpace” and “Bibliographic Item Co-Occurrence Matrix Builder” (BICOMB) were used to analyze the publications reviewed at quantitative level. Another piece of software called “gCLUTO”, was used to investigate the hot spots with visualization techniques at qualitative level. RESULTS: A total of 906 publications were retrieved between 2000 and 2018. There is an increasing number of publications, from 15 in 2000 to 86 in 2018. Journal of Arthroplasty is the leading journal which has the most publications on knee revision. The United States has been the biggest contributor. Mayo Clinic became the leader among the institutions which have conducted correlational researches. David G. Lewallen, Robert L. Barrack and Michael A. Mont should be regarded as the scholars who have made outstanding contribution. Hot spots were summed up in six clusters, respectively, the solutions for infection, prostheses, the adverse effects, the surgical techniques, epidemiological characters, and the pathophysiology of the revision knee. CONCLUSIONS: We found a growing trend in knee revision research and extracted the most contributive researchers, institutions, countries, journals, and most-cited articles worldwide. The solutions for complications, surgical applications and analysis for epidemiological characters have been the hot spots. Multi-disciplinary integration is becoming the time-trend of hot spots. Minimally invasive and navigation are directions of revision surgery. They together constitute a solid foundation and set up a fingerpost for the future scientific research and clinical treatment. AME Publishing Company 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8033385/ /pubmed/33842609 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3969 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhai, Kelei Ma, Weifeng Huang, Tao Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
title | Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
title_full | Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
title_fullStr | Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
title_short | Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
title_sort | hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842609 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaikelei hotspotsandtrendsinkneerevisionresearchsincethe21stcenturyabibliometricanalysis AT maweifeng hotspotsandtrendsinkneerevisionresearchsincethe21stcenturyabibliometricanalysis AT huangtao hotspotsandtrendsinkneerevisionresearchsincethe21stcenturyabibliometricanalysis |