Cargando…

Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement

Evaluation of the validity and applicability of published prognostic prediction models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential, because determining the patients’ prognosis at an early stage may reduce mortality. This study was aimed to utilize the transparent reporting of a multivariabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Liuqing, Wang, Qiang, Cui, Tingting, Huang, Jinxin, Shi, Naiyang, Jin, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842642
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6933
_version_ 1783676403907035136
author Yang, Liuqing
Wang, Qiang
Cui, Tingting
Huang, Jinxin
Shi, Naiyang
Jin, Hui
author_facet Yang, Liuqing
Wang, Qiang
Cui, Tingting
Huang, Jinxin
Shi, Naiyang
Jin, Hui
author_sort Yang, Liuqing
collection PubMed
description Evaluation of the validity and applicability of published prognostic prediction models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential, because determining the patients’ prognosis at an early stage may reduce mortality. This study was aimed to utilize the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) to report the completeness of COVID-19-related prognostic models and appraise its effectiveness in clinical practice. A systematic search of the Web of Science and PubMed was performed for studies published until August 11, 2020. All models were assessed on model development, external validation of existing models, incremental values, and development and validation of the same model. TRIPOD was used to assess the completeness of included models, and the completeness of each item was also reported. In total, 52 publications were included, including 67 models. Age, disease history, lymphoma count, history of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cell count, and platelet count were the commonly used predictors. The predicted outcome was death, development of severe or critical state, survival time, and length-of-hospital stay. The reported discrimination performance of all models ranged from 0.361 to 0.994, while few models reported calibration. Overall, the reporting completeness based on TRIPOD was between 31% and 83% [median, 67% (interquartile range: 62%, 73%)]. Blinding of the outcome to be predicted or predictors were poorly reported. Additionally, there was little description on the handling of missing data. This assessment indicated a poorly-reported COVID-19 prognostic model in existing literature. The risk of over-fitting may exist with these models. The reporting of calibration and external validation should be given more attention in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8033387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80333872021-04-09 Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement Yang, Liuqing Wang, Qiang Cui, Tingting Huang, Jinxin Shi, Naiyang Jin, Hui Ann Transl Med Review Article Evaluation of the validity and applicability of published prognostic prediction models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential, because determining the patients’ prognosis at an early stage may reduce mortality. This study was aimed to utilize the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) to report the completeness of COVID-19-related prognostic models and appraise its effectiveness in clinical practice. A systematic search of the Web of Science and PubMed was performed for studies published until August 11, 2020. All models were assessed on model development, external validation of existing models, incremental values, and development and validation of the same model. TRIPOD was used to assess the completeness of included models, and the completeness of each item was also reported. In total, 52 publications were included, including 67 models. Age, disease history, lymphoma count, history of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cell count, and platelet count were the commonly used predictors. The predicted outcome was death, development of severe or critical state, survival time, and length-of-hospital stay. The reported discrimination performance of all models ranged from 0.361 to 0.994, while few models reported calibration. Overall, the reporting completeness based on TRIPOD was between 31% and 83% [median, 67% (interquartile range: 62%, 73%)]. Blinding of the outcome to be predicted or predictors were poorly reported. Additionally, there was little description on the handling of missing data. This assessment indicated a poorly-reported COVID-19 prognostic model in existing literature. The risk of over-fitting may exist with these models. The reporting of calibration and external validation should be given more attention in future research. AME Publishing Company 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8033387/ /pubmed/33842642 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6933 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Yang, Liuqing
Wang, Qiang
Cui, Tingting
Huang, Jinxin
Shi, Naiyang
Jin, Hui
Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
title Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
title_full Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
title_fullStr Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
title_full_unstemmed Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
title_short Reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
title_sort reporting of coronavirus disease 2019 prognostic models: the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis statement
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842642
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6933
work_keys_str_mv AT yangliuqing reportingofcoronavirusdisease2019prognosticmodelsthetransparentreportingofamultivariablepredictionmodelforindividualprognosisordiagnosisstatement
AT wangqiang reportingofcoronavirusdisease2019prognosticmodelsthetransparentreportingofamultivariablepredictionmodelforindividualprognosisordiagnosisstatement
AT cuitingting reportingofcoronavirusdisease2019prognosticmodelsthetransparentreportingofamultivariablepredictionmodelforindividualprognosisordiagnosisstatement
AT huangjinxin reportingofcoronavirusdisease2019prognosticmodelsthetransparentreportingofamultivariablepredictionmodelforindividualprognosisordiagnosisstatement
AT shinaiyang reportingofcoronavirusdisease2019prognosticmodelsthetransparentreportingofamultivariablepredictionmodelforindividualprognosisordiagnosisstatement
AT jinhui reportingofcoronavirusdisease2019prognosticmodelsthetransparentreportingofamultivariablepredictionmodelforindividualprognosisordiagnosisstatement