Cargando…

Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair

BACKGROUND: Open repair for gluteus medius and minimus tears is a common surgical treatment for patients with lateral hip pain associated with abductor tears; however, clinically meaningful outcomes have not been described after open surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To define the minimal clinically impo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uppstrom, Tyler J., Sullivan, Spencer W., Burger, Joost A., Ranawat, Anil S., Kelly, Bryan T., Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007740
_version_ 1783676407210049536
author Uppstrom, Tyler J.
Sullivan, Spencer W.
Burger, Joost A.
Ranawat, Anil S.
Kelly, Bryan T.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
author_facet Uppstrom, Tyler J.
Sullivan, Spencer W.
Burger, Joost A.
Ranawat, Anil S.
Kelly, Bryan T.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
author_sort Uppstrom, Tyler J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open repair for gluteus medius and minimus tears is a common surgical treatment for patients with lateral hip pain associated with abductor tears; however, clinically meaningful outcomes have not been described after open surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing open gluteus medius or minimus repair, and to identify preoperative patient characteristics predictive of achieving MCID postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a consecutive series of patients undergoing open abductor repair between July 2010 and April 2019 was conducted. Perioperative patient data collected included patient characteristics and preoperative and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score. Paired t tests were utilized to compare preoperative and postoperative PROMs and MCID was calculated for both PROMs. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to assess the association between preoperative variables and the likelihood for achieving MCID. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The majority of patients were female (78.7%), with an average age of 63 ± 10.7 years. The average follow-up for both the mHHS and the iHOT-33 surveys was 37.8 ± 27.9 months (range, 10-102 months). Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements on the mHHS and iHOT-33 postoperatively (P < .001 for both). The MCIDs of mHHS and iHOT-33 were calculated to be 9.9 and 14.3, respectively. Overall, 82.9% of patients achieved MCID for mHHS and 84.1% of patients achieved MCID for iHOT-33 postoperatively. Multivariate logistical analysis demonstrated younger patients were less likely to achieve MCID for both outcome measures. Four patients (8.5%) suffered postoperative complications after open repair. CONCLUSION: This study defined MCID for mHHS and iHOT-33 for patients undergoing open repair of hip abductor tears, with a large percentage of patients (>80%) achieving meaningful outcomes for both outcome measures. There was a low complication rate. Younger patients were less likely to achieve MCID compared with older patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8033401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80334012021-04-21 Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair Uppstrom, Tyler J. Sullivan, Spencer W. Burger, Joost A. Ranawat, Anil S. Kelly, Bryan T. Nwachukwu, Benedict U. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Open repair for gluteus medius and minimus tears is a common surgical treatment for patients with lateral hip pain associated with abductor tears; however, clinically meaningful outcomes have not been described after open surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing open gluteus medius or minimus repair, and to identify preoperative patient characteristics predictive of achieving MCID postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a consecutive series of patients undergoing open abductor repair between July 2010 and April 2019 was conducted. Perioperative patient data collected included patient characteristics and preoperative and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score. Paired t tests were utilized to compare preoperative and postoperative PROMs and MCID was calculated for both PROMs. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to assess the association between preoperative variables and the likelihood for achieving MCID. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The majority of patients were female (78.7%), with an average age of 63 ± 10.7 years. The average follow-up for both the mHHS and the iHOT-33 surveys was 37.8 ± 27.9 months (range, 10-102 months). Patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements on the mHHS and iHOT-33 postoperatively (P < .001 for both). The MCIDs of mHHS and iHOT-33 were calculated to be 9.9 and 14.3, respectively. Overall, 82.9% of patients achieved MCID for mHHS and 84.1% of patients achieved MCID for iHOT-33 postoperatively. Multivariate logistical analysis demonstrated younger patients were less likely to achieve MCID for both outcome measures. Four patients (8.5%) suffered postoperative complications after open repair. CONCLUSION: This study defined MCID for mHHS and iHOT-33 for patients undergoing open repair of hip abductor tears, with a large percentage of patients (>80%) achieving meaningful outcomes for both outcome measures. There was a low complication rate. Younger patients were less likely to achieve MCID compared with older patients. SAGE Publications 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8033401/ /pubmed/33889649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007740 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Uppstrom, Tyler J.
Sullivan, Spencer W.
Burger, Joost A.
Ranawat, Anil S.
Kelly, Bryan T.
Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair
title Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair
title_full Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair
title_fullStr Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair
title_full_unstemmed Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair
title_short Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair
title_sort defining minimal clinically important difference after open hip abductor repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8033401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007740
work_keys_str_mv AT uppstromtylerj definingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteropenhipabductorrepair
AT sullivanspencerw definingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteropenhipabductorrepair
AT burgerjoosta definingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteropenhipabductorrepair
AT ranawatanils definingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteropenhipabductorrepair
AT kellybryant definingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteropenhipabductorrepair
AT nwachukwubenedictu definingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceafteropenhipabductorrepair