Cargando…

Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020

INTRODUCTION: Standard testing for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on RT-PCR tests, but detection of viral genetic material alone does not indicate ongoing infectious potential. The ability to isolate whole virus represents a better proxy for infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Mina, Pawliuk, Colleen, Nguyen, Tribesty, Griffitt, Amanda, Dix-Cooper, Linda, Fourik, Nadia, Dawes, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834961
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.14.2001506
_version_ 1783676473999097856
author Park, Mina
Pawliuk, Colleen
Nguyen, Tribesty
Griffitt, Amanda
Dix-Cooper, Linda
Fourik, Nadia
Dawes, Martin
author_facet Park, Mina
Pawliuk, Colleen
Nguyen, Tribesty
Griffitt, Amanda
Dix-Cooper, Linda
Fourik, Nadia
Dawes, Martin
author_sort Park, Mina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Standard testing for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on RT-PCR tests, but detection of viral genetic material alone does not indicate ongoing infectious potential. The ability to isolate whole virus represents a better proxy for infectivity. AIM: The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the current literature and compare the reported periods of positive SARS-CoV-2 detection from studies that conducted RT-PCR testing in addition to experiments isolating whole virus. METHODS: Using a rapid review approach, studies reporting empirical data on the duration of positive RT-PCR results and/or successful viral isolation following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans were identified through searches of peer-reviewed and pre-print health sciences literature. Articles were screened for relevance, then data were extracted, analysed, and synthesised. RESULTS: Of the 160 studies included for qualitative analysis, 84% (n = 135) investigated duration of positive RT-PCR tests only, 5% (n = 8) investigated duration of successful viral isolations, while 11% (n = 17) included measurements on both. There was significant heterogeneity in reported data. There was a prolonged time to viral clearance when deduced from RT-PCR tests compared with viral isolations (median: 26 vs 9 days). DISCUSSION: Findings from this review support a minimum 10-day period of isolation but certain cases where virus was isolated after 10 days were identified. Given the extended time to viral clearance from RT-PCR tests, future research should ensure standard reporting of RT-PCR protocols and results to help inform testing policies aimed at clearance from isolation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8034061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80340612021-04-12 Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020 Park, Mina Pawliuk, Colleen Nguyen, Tribesty Griffitt, Amanda Dix-Cooper, Linda Fourik, Nadia Dawes, Martin Euro Surveill Review INTRODUCTION: Standard testing for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on RT-PCR tests, but detection of viral genetic material alone does not indicate ongoing infectious potential. The ability to isolate whole virus represents a better proxy for infectivity. AIM: The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the current literature and compare the reported periods of positive SARS-CoV-2 detection from studies that conducted RT-PCR testing in addition to experiments isolating whole virus. METHODS: Using a rapid review approach, studies reporting empirical data on the duration of positive RT-PCR results and/or successful viral isolation following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans were identified through searches of peer-reviewed and pre-print health sciences literature. Articles were screened for relevance, then data were extracted, analysed, and synthesised. RESULTS: Of the 160 studies included for qualitative analysis, 84% (n = 135) investigated duration of positive RT-PCR tests only, 5% (n = 8) investigated duration of successful viral isolations, while 11% (n = 17) included measurements on both. There was significant heterogeneity in reported data. There was a prolonged time to viral clearance when deduced from RT-PCR tests compared with viral isolations (median: 26 vs 9 days). DISCUSSION: Findings from this review support a minimum 10-day period of isolation but certain cases where virus was isolated after 10 days were identified. Given the extended time to viral clearance from RT-PCR tests, future research should ensure standard reporting of RT-PCR protocols and results to help inform testing policies aimed at clearance from isolation. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8034061/ /pubmed/33834961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.14.2001506 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Park, Mina
Pawliuk, Colleen
Nguyen, Tribesty
Griffitt, Amanda
Dix-Cooper, Linda
Fourik, Nadia
Dawes, Martin
Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020
title Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020
title_full Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020
title_fullStr Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020
title_full_unstemmed Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020
title_short Determining the communicable period of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature, March to September 2020
title_sort determining the communicable period of sars-cov-2: a rapid review of the literature, march to september 2020
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33834961
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.14.2001506
work_keys_str_mv AT parkmina determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020
AT pawliukcolleen determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020
AT nguyentribesty determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020
AT griffittamanda determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020
AT dixcooperlinda determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020
AT fouriknadia determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020
AT dawesmartin determiningthecommunicableperiodofsarscov2arapidreviewoftheliteraturemarchtoseptember2020