Cargando…

An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2

BACKGROUND: X-ray computed tomography is acknowledged as a powerful tool for the study of root system architecture of plants growing in soil. In this paper, we improved the original root segmentation algorithm “Rootine” and present its succeeding version “Rootine v.2”. In addition to gray value info...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phalempin, Maxime, Lippold, Eva, Vetterlein, Doris, Schlüter, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00735-4
_version_ 1783676477119660032
author Phalempin, Maxime
Lippold, Eva
Vetterlein, Doris
Schlüter, Steffen
author_facet Phalempin, Maxime
Lippold, Eva
Vetterlein, Doris
Schlüter, Steffen
author_sort Phalempin, Maxime
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: X-ray computed tomography is acknowledged as a powerful tool for the study of root system architecture of plants growing in soil. In this paper, we improved the original root segmentation algorithm “Rootine” and present its succeeding version “Rootine v.2”. In addition to gray value information, Rootine algorithms are based on shape detection of cylindrical roots. Both algorithms are macros for the ImageJ software and are made freely available to the public. New features in Rootine v.2 are (i) a pot wall detection and removal step to avoid segmentation artefacts for roots growing along the pot wall, (ii) a calculation of the root average gray value based on a histogram analysis, (iii) an automatic calculation of thresholds for hysteresis thresholding of the tubeness image to reduce the number of parameters and (iv) a false negatives recovery based on shape criteria to increase root recovery. We compare the segmentation results of Rootine v.1 and Rootine v.2 with the results of root washing and subsequent analysis with WinRhizo. We use a benchmark dataset of maize roots (Zea mays L. cv. B73) grown in repacked soil for two scenarios with differing soil heterogeneity and image quality. RESULTS: We demonstrate that Rootine v.2 outperforms its preceding version in terms of root recovery and enables to match better the root diameter distribution data obtained with root washing. Despite a longer processing time, Rootine v.2 comprises less user-defined parameters and shows an overall greater usability. CONCLUSION: The proposed method facilitates higher root detection accuracy than its predecessor and has the potential for improving high-throughput root phenotyping procedures based on X-ray computed tomography data analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8034080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80340802021-04-12 An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2 Phalempin, Maxime Lippold, Eva Vetterlein, Doris Schlüter, Steffen Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: X-ray computed tomography is acknowledged as a powerful tool for the study of root system architecture of plants growing in soil. In this paper, we improved the original root segmentation algorithm “Rootine” and present its succeeding version “Rootine v.2”. In addition to gray value information, Rootine algorithms are based on shape detection of cylindrical roots. Both algorithms are macros for the ImageJ software and are made freely available to the public. New features in Rootine v.2 are (i) a pot wall detection and removal step to avoid segmentation artefacts for roots growing along the pot wall, (ii) a calculation of the root average gray value based on a histogram analysis, (iii) an automatic calculation of thresholds for hysteresis thresholding of the tubeness image to reduce the number of parameters and (iv) a false negatives recovery based on shape criteria to increase root recovery. We compare the segmentation results of Rootine v.1 and Rootine v.2 with the results of root washing and subsequent analysis with WinRhizo. We use a benchmark dataset of maize roots (Zea mays L. cv. B73) grown in repacked soil for two scenarios with differing soil heterogeneity and image quality. RESULTS: We demonstrate that Rootine v.2 outperforms its preceding version in terms of root recovery and enables to match better the root diameter distribution data obtained with root washing. Despite a longer processing time, Rootine v.2 comprises less user-defined parameters and shows an overall greater usability. CONCLUSION: The proposed method facilitates higher root detection accuracy than its predecessor and has the potential for improving high-throughput root phenotyping procedures based on X-ray computed tomography data analysis. BioMed Central 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8034080/ /pubmed/33832482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00735-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Phalempin, Maxime
Lippold, Eva
Vetterlein, Doris
Schlüter, Steffen
An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2
title An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2
title_full An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2
title_fullStr An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2
title_full_unstemmed An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2
title_short An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2
title_sort improved method for the segmentation of roots from x-ray computed tomography 3d images: rootine v.2
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00735-4
work_keys_str_mv AT phalempinmaxime animprovedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT lippoldeva animprovedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT vetterleindoris animprovedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT schlutersteffen animprovedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT phalempinmaxime improvedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT lippoldeva improvedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT vetterleindoris improvedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2
AT schlutersteffen improvedmethodforthesegmentationofrootsfromxraycomputedtomography3dimagesrootinev2