Cargando…

Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is thought to have increased use of virtual care, but population-based studies are lacking. We aimed to assess the uptake of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic using comprehensive population-based data from Ontario. METHODS: This wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatia, R. Sacha, Chu, Cherry, Pang, Andrea, Tadrous, Mina, Stamenova, Vess, Cram, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Joule Inc. or its licensors 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597307
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200311
_version_ 1783676516955062272
author Bhatia, R. Sacha
Chu, Cherry
Pang, Andrea
Tadrous, Mina
Stamenova, Vess
Cram, Peter
author_facet Bhatia, R. Sacha
Chu, Cherry
Pang, Andrea
Tadrous, Mina
Stamenova, Vess
Cram, Peter
author_sort Bhatia, R. Sacha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is thought to have increased use of virtual care, but population-based studies are lacking. We aimed to assess the uptake of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic using comprehensive population-based data from Ontario. METHODS: This was a repeated cross-sectional study design. We used administrative data to evaluate changes in in-person and virtual visits among all residents of Ontario before (2012–2019) and during (January–August 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. We included all patients who had an ambulatory care visit in Ontario. We excluded claims for patients who were not Ontario residents or had an invalid or missing health card number. We compared monthly or quarterly virtual care use across age groups, neighbourhood income quintiles and chronic disease subgroups. We also examined physician characteristics that may have been associated with virtual care use. RESULTS: Among all residents of Ontario (population 14.6 million), virtual care increased from 1.6% of total ambulatory visits in the second quarter of 2019 to 70.6% in the second quarter of 2020. The proportion of physicians who provided 1 or more virtual visits per year increased from 7.0% in the second quarter of 2019 to 85.9% in the second quarter of 2020. The proportion of Ontarians who had a virtual visit increased from 1.3% in 2019 to 29.2% in 2020. Older patients were the highest users of virtual care. The proportion of total virtual visits that were provided to patients residing in rural areas (v. urban areas) declined significantly between 2012 and 2020, reflecting a shift in virtual care to a service increasingly used in urban centres. The rates of virtual care use increased similarly across all conditions and across all income quintiles. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that Ontario’s approach to virtual care led to broad adoption across all provider groups, patient age, types of chronic diseases and neighborhood income. These findings have policy implications, including use of virtual care billing codes, for the ongoing use of virtual care during the second wave of the pandemic and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8034297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Joule Inc. or its licensors
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80342972021-04-16 Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study Bhatia, R. Sacha Chu, Cherry Pang, Andrea Tadrous, Mina Stamenova, Vess Cram, Peter CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is thought to have increased use of virtual care, but population-based studies are lacking. We aimed to assess the uptake of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic using comprehensive population-based data from Ontario. METHODS: This was a repeated cross-sectional study design. We used administrative data to evaluate changes in in-person and virtual visits among all residents of Ontario before (2012–2019) and during (January–August 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. We included all patients who had an ambulatory care visit in Ontario. We excluded claims for patients who were not Ontario residents or had an invalid or missing health card number. We compared monthly or quarterly virtual care use across age groups, neighbourhood income quintiles and chronic disease subgroups. We also examined physician characteristics that may have been associated with virtual care use. RESULTS: Among all residents of Ontario (population 14.6 million), virtual care increased from 1.6% of total ambulatory visits in the second quarter of 2019 to 70.6% in the second quarter of 2020. The proportion of physicians who provided 1 or more virtual visits per year increased from 7.0% in the second quarter of 2019 to 85.9% in the second quarter of 2020. The proportion of Ontarians who had a virtual visit increased from 1.3% in 2019 to 29.2% in 2020. Older patients were the highest users of virtual care. The proportion of total virtual visits that were provided to patients residing in rural areas (v. urban areas) declined significantly between 2012 and 2020, reflecting a shift in virtual care to a service increasingly used in urban centres. The rates of virtual care use increased similarly across all conditions and across all income quintiles. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that Ontario’s approach to virtual care led to broad adoption across all provider groups, patient age, types of chronic diseases and neighborhood income. These findings have policy implications, including use of virtual care billing codes, for the ongoing use of virtual care during the second wave of the pandemic and beyond. Joule Inc. or its licensors 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8034297/ /pubmed/33597307 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200311 Text en © 2021 Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Bhatia, R. Sacha
Chu, Cherry
Pang, Andrea
Tadrous, Mina
Stamenova, Vess
Cram, Peter
Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
title Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
title_full Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
title_short Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
title_sort virtual care use before and during the covid-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597307
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200311
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatiarsacha virtualcareusebeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT chucherry virtualcareusebeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT pangandrea virtualcareusebeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT tadrousmina virtualcareusebeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT stamenovavess virtualcareusebeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT crampeter virtualcareusebeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy