Cargando…

Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19

OBJECTIVES: Fast diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the detection of high-risk patients are crucial but challenging in the pandemic outbreak. The aim of this study was to evaluate if deep learning-based software correlates well with the generally accepted visual-based scoring for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biebau, Charlotte, Dubbeldam, Adriana, Cockmartin, Lesley, Coudyze, Walter, Coolen, Johan, Verschakelen, Johny, De Wever, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870080
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2330
_version_ 1783676539206893568
author Biebau, Charlotte
Dubbeldam, Adriana
Cockmartin, Lesley
Coudyze, Walter
Coolen, Johan
Verschakelen, Johny
De Wever, Walter
author_facet Biebau, Charlotte
Dubbeldam, Adriana
Cockmartin, Lesley
Coudyze, Walter
Coolen, Johan
Verschakelen, Johny
De Wever, Walter
author_sort Biebau, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Fast diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the detection of high-risk patients are crucial but challenging in the pandemic outbreak. The aim of this study was to evaluate if deep learning-based software correlates well with the generally accepted visual-based scoring for quantification of the lung injury to help radiologist in triage and monitoring of COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the lobar analysis of lung opacities (% opacities) by means of a prototype deep learning artificial intelligence (AI)-based software was compared to visual scoring. The visual scoring system used five categories (0: 0%, 1: 0–5%, 2: 5–25%, 3: 25–50%, 4: 50–75% and 5: >75% involvement). The total visual lung injury was obtained by the sum of the estimated grade of involvement of each lobe and divided by five. RESULTS: The dataset consisted of 182 consecutive confirmed COVID-19 positive patients with a median age of 65 ± 16 years, including 110 (60%) men and 72 (40%) women. There was a correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001) between the visual and the AI-based estimates of the severity of lung injury. CONCLUSION: The study indicates a very good correlation between the visual scoring and AI-based estimates of lung injury in COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8034398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80343982021-04-16 Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19 Biebau, Charlotte Dubbeldam, Adriana Cockmartin, Lesley Coudyze, Walter Coolen, Johan Verschakelen, Johny De Wever, Walter J Belg Soc Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Fast diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the detection of high-risk patients are crucial but challenging in the pandemic outbreak. The aim of this study was to evaluate if deep learning-based software correlates well with the generally accepted visual-based scoring for quantification of the lung injury to help radiologist in triage and monitoring of COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the lobar analysis of lung opacities (% opacities) by means of a prototype deep learning artificial intelligence (AI)-based software was compared to visual scoring. The visual scoring system used five categories (0: 0%, 1: 0–5%, 2: 5–25%, 3: 25–50%, 4: 50–75% and 5: >75% involvement). The total visual lung injury was obtained by the sum of the estimated grade of involvement of each lobe and divided by five. RESULTS: The dataset consisted of 182 consecutive confirmed COVID-19 positive patients with a median age of 65 ± 16 years, including 110 (60%) men and 72 (40%) women. There was a correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001) between the visual and the AI-based estimates of the severity of lung injury. CONCLUSION: The study indicates a very good correlation between the visual scoring and AI-based estimates of lung injury in COVID-19. Ubiquity Press 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8034398/ /pubmed/33870080 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2330 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Biebau, Charlotte
Dubbeldam, Adriana
Cockmartin, Lesley
Coudyze, Walter
Coolen, Johan
Verschakelen, Johny
De Wever, Walter
Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19
title Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19
title_full Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19
title_fullStr Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19
title_short Comparing Visual Scoring of Lung Injury with a Quantifying AI-Based Scoring in Patients with COVID-19
title_sort comparing visual scoring of lung injury with a quantifying ai-based scoring in patients with covid-19
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870080
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2330
work_keys_str_mv AT biebaucharlotte comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19
AT dubbeldamadriana comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19
AT cockmartinlesley comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19
AT coudyzewalter comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19
AT coolenjohan comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19
AT verschakelenjohny comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19
AT deweverwalter comparingvisualscoringoflunginjurywithaquantifyingaibasedscoringinpatientswithcovid19