Cargando…

Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes between patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastases (BM) resection cavity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients having single-fraction SRS after BM resection who developed either LMD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teyateeti, Achiraya, Brown, Paul D, Mahajan, Anita, Laack, Nadia N, Pollock, Bruce E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab036
_version_ 1783676577386594304
author Teyateeti, Achiraya
Brown, Paul D
Mahajan, Anita
Laack, Nadia N
Pollock, Bruce E
author_facet Teyateeti, Achiraya
Brown, Paul D
Mahajan, Anita
Laack, Nadia N
Pollock, Bruce E
author_sort Teyateeti, Achiraya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes between patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastases (BM) resection cavity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients having single-fraction SRS after BM resection who developed either LMD (n = 11) or DBR (n = 18) as their initial and only site of intracranial progression were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients developing LMD more commonly had a metachronous presentation (91% vs 50%, P = .04) and recursive partitioning class 1 status (45% vs 6%, P = .02). There was no difference in the median time from SRS to the development of LMD or DBR (5.0 vs 3.8 months, P = .68). The majority of patients with LMD (10/11, 91%) developed the nodular variant (nLMD). Treatment for LMD was repeat SRS (n = 4), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT; n = 5), resection + WBRT (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 1). Treatment for DBR was repeat SRS (n = 9), WBRT (n = 3), resection + resection cavity SRS (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 5). Median overall survival (OS) from time of resection cavity SRS was 15.7 months in the LMD group and 12.7 months in the DBR group (P = .60), respectively. Median OS in salvage SRS and salvage WBRT were 25.4 and 5.0 months in the nLMD group (P = .004) while 18.7 and 16.2 months in the DBR group (P = .30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following BM resection cavity SRS, nLMD recurrence is much more frequent than classical LMD. Salvage SRS may be considered for selected patients with nLMD, reserving salvage WBRT for patients with extensive intracranial disease without compromising survival. Further study with larger numbers of patients is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8034660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80346602021-04-14 Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery Teyateeti, Achiraya Brown, Paul D Mahajan, Anita Laack, Nadia N Pollock, Bruce E Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes between patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastases (BM) resection cavity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients having single-fraction SRS after BM resection who developed either LMD (n = 11) or DBR (n = 18) as their initial and only site of intracranial progression were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients developing LMD more commonly had a metachronous presentation (91% vs 50%, P = .04) and recursive partitioning class 1 status (45% vs 6%, P = .02). There was no difference in the median time from SRS to the development of LMD or DBR (5.0 vs 3.8 months, P = .68). The majority of patients with LMD (10/11, 91%) developed the nodular variant (nLMD). Treatment for LMD was repeat SRS (n = 4), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT; n = 5), resection + WBRT (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 1). Treatment for DBR was repeat SRS (n = 9), WBRT (n = 3), resection + resection cavity SRS (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 5). Median overall survival (OS) from time of resection cavity SRS was 15.7 months in the LMD group and 12.7 months in the DBR group (P = .60), respectively. Median OS in salvage SRS and salvage WBRT were 25.4 and 5.0 months in the nLMD group (P = .004) while 18.7 and 16.2 months in the DBR group (P = .30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following BM resection cavity SRS, nLMD recurrence is much more frequent than classical LMD. Salvage SRS may be considered for selected patients with nLMD, reserving salvage WBRT for patients with extensive intracranial disease without compromising survival. Further study with larger numbers of patients is needed. Oxford University Press 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8034660/ /pubmed/33860228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab036 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Teyateeti, Achiraya
Brown, Paul D
Mahajan, Anita
Laack, Nadia N
Pollock, Bruce E
Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
title Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
title_full Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
title_fullStr Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
title_short Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
title_sort outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab036
work_keys_str_mv AT teyateetiachiraya outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery
AT brownpauld outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery
AT mahajananita outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery
AT laacknadian outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery
AT pollockbrucee outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery