Cargando…
Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery
BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes between patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastases (BM) resection cavity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients having single-fraction SRS after BM resection who developed either LMD...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab036 |
_version_ | 1783676577386594304 |
---|---|
author | Teyateeti, Achiraya Brown, Paul D Mahajan, Anita Laack, Nadia N Pollock, Bruce E |
author_facet | Teyateeti, Achiraya Brown, Paul D Mahajan, Anita Laack, Nadia N Pollock, Bruce E |
author_sort | Teyateeti, Achiraya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes between patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastases (BM) resection cavity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients having single-fraction SRS after BM resection who developed either LMD (n = 11) or DBR (n = 18) as their initial and only site of intracranial progression were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients developing LMD more commonly had a metachronous presentation (91% vs 50%, P = .04) and recursive partitioning class 1 status (45% vs 6%, P = .02). There was no difference in the median time from SRS to the development of LMD or DBR (5.0 vs 3.8 months, P = .68). The majority of patients with LMD (10/11, 91%) developed the nodular variant (nLMD). Treatment for LMD was repeat SRS (n = 4), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT; n = 5), resection + WBRT (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 1). Treatment for DBR was repeat SRS (n = 9), WBRT (n = 3), resection + resection cavity SRS (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 5). Median overall survival (OS) from time of resection cavity SRS was 15.7 months in the LMD group and 12.7 months in the DBR group (P = .60), respectively. Median OS in salvage SRS and salvage WBRT were 25.4 and 5.0 months in the nLMD group (P = .004) while 18.7 and 16.2 months in the DBR group (P = .30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following BM resection cavity SRS, nLMD recurrence is much more frequent than classical LMD. Salvage SRS may be considered for selected patients with nLMD, reserving salvage WBRT for patients with extensive intracranial disease without compromising survival. Further study with larger numbers of patients is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8034660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80346602021-04-14 Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery Teyateeti, Achiraya Brown, Paul D Mahajan, Anita Laack, Nadia N Pollock, Bruce E Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes between patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and distant brain recurrence (DBR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastases (BM) resection cavity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients having single-fraction SRS after BM resection who developed either LMD (n = 11) or DBR (n = 18) as their initial and only site of intracranial progression were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients developing LMD more commonly had a metachronous presentation (91% vs 50%, P = .04) and recursive partitioning class 1 status (45% vs 6%, P = .02). There was no difference in the median time from SRS to the development of LMD or DBR (5.0 vs 3.8 months, P = .68). The majority of patients with LMD (10/11, 91%) developed the nodular variant (nLMD). Treatment for LMD was repeat SRS (n = 4), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT; n = 5), resection + WBRT (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 1). Treatment for DBR was repeat SRS (n = 9), WBRT (n = 3), resection + resection cavity SRS (n = 1), and no treatment (n = 5). Median overall survival (OS) from time of resection cavity SRS was 15.7 months in the LMD group and 12.7 months in the DBR group (P = .60), respectively. Median OS in salvage SRS and salvage WBRT were 25.4 and 5.0 months in the nLMD group (P = .004) while 18.7 and 16.2 months in the DBR group (P = .30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following BM resection cavity SRS, nLMD recurrence is much more frequent than classical LMD. Salvage SRS may be considered for selected patients with nLMD, reserving salvage WBRT for patients with extensive intracranial disease without compromising survival. Further study with larger numbers of patients is needed. Oxford University Press 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8034660/ /pubmed/33860228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab036 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Teyateeti, Achiraya Brown, Paul D Mahajan, Anita Laack, Nadia N Pollock, Bruce E Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
title | Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
title_full | Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
title_fullStr | Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
title_short | Outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
title_sort | outcome comparison of patients who develop leptomeningeal disease or distant brain recurrence after brain metastases resection cavity radiosurgery |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teyateetiachiraya outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery AT brownpauld outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery AT mahajananita outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery AT laacknadian outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery AT pollockbrucee outcomecomparisonofpatientswhodevelopleptomeningealdiseaseordistantbrainrecurrenceafterbrainmetastasesresectioncavityradiosurgery |