Cargando…

Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer

Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vora, Nemi, Christensen, Peter R., Demarteau, Jérémy, Baral, Nawa Raj, Keasling, Jay D., Helms, Brett A., Scown, Corinne D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf0187
Descripción
Sumario:Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg(−1)) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg CO(2)e kg(−1)), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg CO(2)e kg(−1). This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.