Cargando…
Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats
We performed a preliminary evaluation of a mobile sampling platform with adjustable push net and live box (Platform) against two common methods for sampling small-bodied fish (i.e., 10–100 mm) in two distinct lentic habitats. Nearshore (NS) littoral habitat was sampled by Platform and beach seine, a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09027-9 |
_version_ | 1783676661120630784 |
---|---|
author | Merz, Joseph E. Anderson, Jesse T. Wiesenfeld, Jesse Zeug, Steven C. |
author_facet | Merz, Joseph E. Anderson, Jesse T. Wiesenfeld, Jesse Zeug, Steven C. |
author_sort | Merz, Joseph E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We performed a preliminary evaluation of a mobile sampling platform with adjustable push net and live box (Platform) against two common methods for sampling small-bodied fish (i.e., 10–100 mm) in two distinct lentic habitats. Nearshore (NS) littoral habitat was sampled by Platform and beach seine, and open water (OW) pelagic habitat by Platform and Kodiak trawl. Our goal was to evaluate the Platform’s ability to describe fish assemblage structure across habitat types in contrast to common techniques restricted to single habitat types that are less comparable due to gear-specific bias. Platform sample speed had a significant positive effect on recapture efficiency of both nearly neutrally buoyant objects and marked fish. Marked fish recapture efficiencies were similar for Platform in NS and OW, indicating similar efficiency across habitat types. Platform capture efficiency was similar to beach seine and greater than Kodiak trawl. With similar sampling time, the Platform collected more individuals and taxa in NS relative to beach seine and in OW relative to Kodiak trawl. Greater taxa detection by the Platform suggests that it may be effective at detecting species that are numerically rare in specific habitats when compared to these methods. Fish CPUE was significantly greater NS regardless of technique. However, by using the Platform, there is greater confidence that this difference was reliable and not a gear selectivity artifact. Overall, this preliminary study demonstrates the Platform’s potential to collect standardized data across NS and OW habitats, track ontogenetic habitat shifts, and detect differences in small-bodied fish taxa richness, relative abundance, and density between NS and OW habitats. Continued experimentation beyond a single reservoir and fish size range is required before consensus can be established regarding the utility of this new push net design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09027-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8035114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80351142021-04-27 Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats Merz, Joseph E. Anderson, Jesse T. Wiesenfeld, Jesse Zeug, Steven C. Environ Monit Assess Article We performed a preliminary evaluation of a mobile sampling platform with adjustable push net and live box (Platform) against two common methods for sampling small-bodied fish (i.e., 10–100 mm) in two distinct lentic habitats. Nearshore (NS) littoral habitat was sampled by Platform and beach seine, and open water (OW) pelagic habitat by Platform and Kodiak trawl. Our goal was to evaluate the Platform’s ability to describe fish assemblage structure across habitat types in contrast to common techniques restricted to single habitat types that are less comparable due to gear-specific bias. Platform sample speed had a significant positive effect on recapture efficiency of both nearly neutrally buoyant objects and marked fish. Marked fish recapture efficiencies were similar for Platform in NS and OW, indicating similar efficiency across habitat types. Platform capture efficiency was similar to beach seine and greater than Kodiak trawl. With similar sampling time, the Platform collected more individuals and taxa in NS relative to beach seine and in OW relative to Kodiak trawl. Greater taxa detection by the Platform suggests that it may be effective at detecting species that are numerically rare in specific habitats when compared to these methods. Fish CPUE was significantly greater NS regardless of technique. However, by using the Platform, there is greater confidence that this difference was reliable and not a gear selectivity artifact. Overall, this preliminary study demonstrates the Platform’s potential to collect standardized data across NS and OW habitats, track ontogenetic habitat shifts, and detect differences in small-bodied fish taxa richness, relative abundance, and density between NS and OW habitats. Continued experimentation beyond a single reservoir and fish size range is required before consensus can be established regarding the utility of this new push net design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09027-9. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8035114/ /pubmed/33835292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09027-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Merz, Joseph E. Anderson, Jesse T. Wiesenfeld, Jesse Zeug, Steven C. Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
title | Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
title_full | Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
title_short | Comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
title_sort | comparison of three sampling methods for small-bodied fish in lentic nearshore and open water habitats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09027-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merzjosephe comparisonofthreesamplingmethodsforsmallbodiedfishinlenticnearshoreandopenwaterhabitats AT andersonjesset comparisonofthreesamplingmethodsforsmallbodiedfishinlenticnearshoreandopenwaterhabitats AT wiesenfeldjesse comparisonofthreesamplingmethodsforsmallbodiedfishinlenticnearshoreandopenwaterhabitats AT zeugstevenc comparisonofthreesamplingmethodsforsmallbodiedfishinlenticnearshoreandopenwaterhabitats |