Cargando…

Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Heon, Lee, Chung Un, Kang, Minyong, Jeon, Hwang Gyun, Jeong, Byong Chang, Seo, Seong Il, Jeon, Seong Soo, Lee, Hyun Moo, Sung, Hyun Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5
_version_ 1783676667634384896
author Kim, Tae Heon
Lee, Chung Un
Kang, Minyong
Jeon, Hwang Gyun
Jeong, Byong Chang
Seo, Seong Il
Jeon, Seong Soo
Lee, Hyun Moo
Sung, Hyun Hwan
author_facet Kim, Tae Heon
Lee, Chung Un
Kang, Minyong
Jeon, Hwang Gyun
Jeong, Byong Chang
Seo, Seong Il
Jeon, Seong Soo
Lee, Hyun Moo
Sung, Hyun Hwan
author_sort Kim, Tae Heon
collection PubMed
description This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80351622021-04-13 Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma Kim, Tae Heon Lee, Chung Un Kang, Minyong Jeon, Hwang Gyun Jeong, Byong Chang Seo, Seong Il Jeon, Seong Soo Lee, Hyun Moo Sung, Hyun Hwan Sci Rep Article This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8035162/ /pubmed/33837237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Tae Heon
Lee, Chung Un
Kang, Minyong
Jeon, Hwang Gyun
Jeong, Byong Chang
Seo, Seong Il
Jeon, Seong Soo
Lee, Hyun Moo
Sung, Hyun Hwan
Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_full Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_short Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
title_sort comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaeheon comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT leechungun comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT kangminyong comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT jeonhwanggyun comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT jeongbyongchang comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT seoseongil comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT jeonseongsoo comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT leehyunmoo comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma
AT sunghyunhwan comparisonofoncologicandfunctionaloutcomesbetweenradicalnephroureterectomyandsegmentalureterectomyforupperurinarytracturothelialcarcinoma