Cargando…

Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing

PURPOSE: ApoE-e4 has a well-established connection to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is available clinically. Yet, there have been no analyses of payer coverage policies for ApoE. Our objective is to analyze private payer coverage policies for ApoE genetic testing, examine the rationales, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arias, Jalayne J., Tyler, Ana M., Douglas, Michael P., Phillips, Kathryn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01042-4
_version_ 1783676679007240192
author Arias, Jalayne J.
Tyler, Ana M.
Douglas, Michael P.
Phillips, Kathryn A.
author_facet Arias, Jalayne J.
Tyler, Ana M.
Douglas, Michael P.
Phillips, Kathryn A.
author_sort Arias, Jalayne J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: ApoE-e4 has a well-established connection to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is available clinically. Yet, there have been no analyses of payer coverage policies for ApoE. Our objective is to analyze private payer coverage policies for ApoE genetic testing, examine the rationales, and describe supporting evidence referenced by policies. METHODS: We searched for policies from the 8 largest private payers (by member numbers) covering ApoE testing for late-onset AD. We implemented content analysis methods to evaluate policies for coverage decisions and rationales. RESULTS: Seven payers had policies with positions on ApoE testing. Five explicitly state they do not cover ApoE and two apply generic pre-authorization criteria. Rationales supporting coverage decisions include: reference to guidelines or national standards, inadequate data supporting testing, characterizing testing as investigational, or that testing would not alter patients’ clinical management. CONCLUSION: Seven of the eight largest private payers’ coverage policies reflect standards that discourage ApoE testing due to a lack of clinical utility. As the field advances, ApoE testing may have an important clinical role, particularly considering that disease-modifying therapies are under evaluation by the Food and Drug Administration. These types of field advancements may not be consistent with private payers’ policies and may cause payers to reevaluate existing coverage policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80352372021-07-08 Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing Arias, Jalayne J. Tyler, Ana M. Douglas, Michael P. Phillips, Kathryn A. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: ApoE-e4 has a well-established connection to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is available clinically. Yet, there have been no analyses of payer coverage policies for ApoE. Our objective is to analyze private payer coverage policies for ApoE genetic testing, examine the rationales, and describe supporting evidence referenced by policies. METHODS: We searched for policies from the 8 largest private payers (by member numbers) covering ApoE testing for late-onset AD. We implemented content analysis methods to evaluate policies for coverage decisions and rationales. RESULTS: Seven payers had policies with positions on ApoE testing. Five explicitly state they do not cover ApoE and two apply generic pre-authorization criteria. Rationales supporting coverage decisions include: reference to guidelines or national standards, inadequate data supporting testing, characterizing testing as investigational, or that testing would not alter patients’ clinical management. CONCLUSION: Seven of the eight largest private payers’ coverage policies reflect standards that discourage ApoE testing due to a lack of clinical utility. As the field advances, ApoE testing may have an important clinical role, particularly considering that disease-modifying therapies are under evaluation by the Food and Drug Administration. These types of field advancements may not be consistent with private payers’ policies and may cause payers to reevaluate existing coverage policies. 2021-01-08 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8035237/ /pubmed/33420342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01042-4 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Arias, Jalayne J.
Tyler, Ana M.
Douglas, Michael P.
Phillips, Kathryn A.
Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing
title Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing
title_full Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing
title_fullStr Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing
title_full_unstemmed Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing
title_short Private Payer Coverage Policies for ApoE-e4 Genetic Testing
title_sort private payer coverage policies for apoe-e4 genetic testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33420342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01042-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ariasjalaynej privatepayercoveragepoliciesforapoee4genetictesting
AT tyleranam privatepayercoveragepoliciesforapoee4genetictesting
AT douglasmichaelp privatepayercoveragepoliciesforapoee4genetictesting
AT phillipskathryna privatepayercoveragepoliciesforapoee4genetictesting