Cargando…

Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?

Research on the relationship between religiosity and fertility intentions revealed substantial cross-national differences. In some countries, a strong and positive effect of religiosity on fertility intentions was found, while in others, the effect was weaker or not significant, and the reasons unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bein, Christoph, Gauthier, Anne H., Mynarska, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09574-w
_version_ 1783676688233660416
author Bein, Christoph
Gauthier, Anne H.
Mynarska, Monika
author_facet Bein, Christoph
Gauthier, Anne H.
Mynarska, Monika
author_sort Bein, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Research on the relationship between religiosity and fertility intentions revealed substantial cross-national differences. In some countries, a strong and positive effect of religiosity on fertility intentions was found, while in others, the effect was weaker or not significant, and the reasons underlying these cross-national differences are still unclear. The aim of this article is to explain these macro-level differences from the perspective of the prevailing gender regime. We argue that in countries with more traditional regimes, a stronger effect of religiosity on fertility intentions could be expected than in countries with a more egalitarian view. We make use of the first wave of the Generations and Gender Survey and incorporate data from a total of 12 European countries in our analysis. We examine the influence of gender regime according to various macro-level indicators on gender attitudes and gender equality using meta-regression analyses. We also conduct robustness checks using other indicators such as the Gender Development Index. Our results reveal that the gender regime is only able to explain these differences in certain situations, specifically those relating to the long-term fertility intentions of men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80353822021-04-27 Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences? Bein, Christoph Gauthier, Anne H. Mynarska, Monika Eur J Popul Article Research on the relationship between religiosity and fertility intentions revealed substantial cross-national differences. In some countries, a strong and positive effect of religiosity on fertility intentions was found, while in others, the effect was weaker or not significant, and the reasons underlying these cross-national differences are still unclear. The aim of this article is to explain these macro-level differences from the perspective of the prevailing gender regime. We argue that in countries with more traditional regimes, a stronger effect of religiosity on fertility intentions could be expected than in countries with a more egalitarian view. We make use of the first wave of the Generations and Gender Survey and incorporate data from a total of 12 European countries in our analysis. We examine the influence of gender regime according to various macro-level indicators on gender attitudes and gender equality using meta-regression analyses. We also conduct robustness checks using other indicators such as the Gender Development Index. Our results reveal that the gender regime is only able to explain these differences in certain situations, specifically those relating to the long-term fertility intentions of men. Springer Netherlands 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8035382/ /pubmed/33911995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09574-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bein, Christoph
Gauthier, Anne H.
Mynarska, Monika
Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?
title Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?
title_full Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?
title_fullStr Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?
title_full_unstemmed Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?
title_short Religiosity and Fertility Intentions: Can the Gender Regime Explain Cross-Country Differences?
title_sort religiosity and fertility intentions: can the gender regime explain cross-country differences?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09574-w
work_keys_str_mv AT beinchristoph religiosityandfertilityintentionscanthegenderregimeexplaincrosscountrydifferences
AT gauthieranneh religiosityandfertilityintentionscanthegenderregimeexplaincrosscountrydifferences
AT mynarskamonika religiosityandfertilityintentionscanthegenderregimeexplaincrosscountrydifferences