Cargando…
Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
PURPOSE: Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13210 |
_version_ | 1783676722915311616 |
---|---|
author | Wakabayashi, Kazuki Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Matsumoto, Kenji Takei, Yoshiki Nishimura, Yasumasa |
author_facet | Wakabayashi, Kazuki Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Matsumoto, Kenji Takei, Yoshiki Nishimura, Yasumasa |
author_sort | Wakabayashi, Kazuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on a patient’s skin. METHODS: Electron beam profiles were acquired with the STR placed on a water‐equivalent phantom and low melting‐point alloy (LMA) placed at the applicator according to commonly used procedures (field sizes: 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters). Depth and lateral dose profiles for 6‐ and 12‐MeV electron beams were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and were benchmarked against film measurements. The width of the off‐axis distance between 80% and 20% doses (P (80‐20)) and the maximum dose were obtained from the lateral dose profiles. Bremsstrahlung emission was analyzed by MC simulations at the depth of maximum dose (R (100)). RESULTS: The depth dose profiles calculated by the MC simulations were consistently within 2% of the measurements. The P (80‐20) at R (100) for 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters were 4.0 mm vs. 7.6 mm (STR vs. LMA) and 4.5 mm vs. 9.2 mm, respectively, for the 6‐MeV electron beam with 7.0‐mm‐thick STR, and 2.7 mm vs. 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm, respectively, for the 12‐MeV electron beam with 12.0‐mm‐thick STR. A hotspot was not observed on the lateral dose profiles obtained with the STR at R (100). The bremsstrahlung emission under the region shielded by the STR was comparable to that obtained with the LMA, even though the STR was placed on the surface of the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Skin collimator with STR provided superior dosimetric characteristics and comparable bremsstrahlung emission to LMA collimator at the applicator. STR could be a new tool for the safe and efficient delivery of electron radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8035551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80355512021-04-15 Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study Wakabayashi, Kazuki Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Matsumoto, Kenji Takei, Yoshiki Nishimura, Yasumasa J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on a patient’s skin. METHODS: Electron beam profiles were acquired with the STR placed on a water‐equivalent phantom and low melting‐point alloy (LMA) placed at the applicator according to commonly used procedures (field sizes: 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters). Depth and lateral dose profiles for 6‐ and 12‐MeV electron beams were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and were benchmarked against film measurements. The width of the off‐axis distance between 80% and 20% doses (P (80‐20)) and the maximum dose were obtained from the lateral dose profiles. Bremsstrahlung emission was analyzed by MC simulations at the depth of maximum dose (R (100)). RESULTS: The depth dose profiles calculated by the MC simulations were consistently within 2% of the measurements. The P (80‐20) at R (100) for 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters were 4.0 mm vs. 7.6 mm (STR vs. LMA) and 4.5 mm vs. 9.2 mm, respectively, for the 6‐MeV electron beam with 7.0‐mm‐thick STR, and 2.7 mm vs. 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm, respectively, for the 12‐MeV electron beam with 12.0‐mm‐thick STR. A hotspot was not observed on the lateral dose profiles obtained with the STR at R (100). The bremsstrahlung emission under the region shielded by the STR was comparable to that obtained with the LMA, even though the STR was placed on the surface of the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Skin collimator with STR provided superior dosimetric characteristics and comparable bremsstrahlung emission to LMA collimator at the applicator. STR could be a new tool for the safe and efficient delivery of electron radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8035551/ /pubmed/33634955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13210 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Wakabayashi, Kazuki Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Matsumoto, Kenji Takei, Yoshiki Nishimura, Yasumasa Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study |
title | Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study |
title_full | Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study |
title_short | Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study |
title_sort | dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: a monte carlo study |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wakabayashikazuki dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy AT monzenhajime dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy AT tamuramikoto dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy AT matsumotokenji dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy AT takeiyoshiki dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy AT nishimurayasumasa dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy |