Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study

PURPOSE: Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakabayashi, Kazuki, Monzen, Hajime, Tamura, Mikoto, Matsumoto, Kenji, Takei, Yoshiki, Nishimura, Yasumasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13210
_version_ 1783676722915311616
author Wakabayashi, Kazuki
Monzen, Hajime
Tamura, Mikoto
Matsumoto, Kenji
Takei, Yoshiki
Nishimura, Yasumasa
author_facet Wakabayashi, Kazuki
Monzen, Hajime
Tamura, Mikoto
Matsumoto, Kenji
Takei, Yoshiki
Nishimura, Yasumasa
author_sort Wakabayashi, Kazuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on a patient’s skin. METHODS: Electron beam profiles were acquired with the STR placed on a water‐equivalent phantom and low melting‐point alloy (LMA) placed at the applicator according to commonly used procedures (field sizes: 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters). Depth and lateral dose profiles for 6‐ and 12‐MeV electron beams were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and were benchmarked against film measurements. The width of the off‐axis distance between 80% and 20% doses (P (80‐20)) and the maximum dose were obtained from the lateral dose profiles. Bremsstrahlung emission was analyzed by MC simulations at the depth of maximum dose (R (100)). RESULTS: The depth dose profiles calculated by the MC simulations were consistently within 2% of the measurements. The P (80‐20) at R (100) for 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters were 4.0 mm vs. 7.6 mm (STR vs. LMA) and 4.5 mm vs. 9.2 mm, respectively, for the 6‐MeV electron beam with 7.0‐mm‐thick STR, and 2.7 mm vs. 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm, respectively, for the 12‐MeV electron beam with 12.0‐mm‐thick STR. A hotspot was not observed on the lateral dose profiles obtained with the STR at R (100). The bremsstrahlung emission under the region shielded by the STR was comparable to that obtained with the LMA, even though the STR was placed on the surface of the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Skin collimator with STR provided superior dosimetric characteristics and comparable bremsstrahlung emission to LMA collimator at the applicator. STR could be a new tool for the safe and efficient delivery of electron radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80355512021-04-15 Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study Wakabayashi, Kazuki Monzen, Hajime Tamura, Mikoto Matsumoto, Kenji Takei, Yoshiki Nishimura, Yasumasa J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on a patient’s skin. METHODS: Electron beam profiles were acquired with the STR placed on a water‐equivalent phantom and low melting‐point alloy (LMA) placed at the applicator according to commonly used procedures (field sizes: 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters). Depth and lateral dose profiles for 6‐ and 12‐MeV electron beams were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and were benchmarked against film measurements. The width of the off‐axis distance between 80% and 20% doses (P (80‐20)) and the maximum dose were obtained from the lateral dose profiles. Bremsstrahlung emission was analyzed by MC simulations at the depth of maximum dose (R (100)). RESULTS: The depth dose profiles calculated by the MC simulations were consistently within 2% of the measurements. The P (80‐20) at R (100) for 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters were 4.0 mm vs. 7.6 mm (STR vs. LMA) and 4.5 mm vs. 9.2 mm, respectively, for the 6‐MeV electron beam with 7.0‐mm‐thick STR, and 2.7 mm vs. 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm, respectively, for the 12‐MeV electron beam with 12.0‐mm‐thick STR. A hotspot was not observed on the lateral dose profiles obtained with the STR at R (100). The bremsstrahlung emission under the region shielded by the STR was comparable to that obtained with the LMA, even though the STR was placed on the surface of the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Skin collimator with STR provided superior dosimetric characteristics and comparable bremsstrahlung emission to LMA collimator at the applicator. STR could be a new tool for the safe and efficient delivery of electron radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8035551/ /pubmed/33634955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13210 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wakabayashi, Kazuki
Monzen, Hajime
Tamura, Mikoto
Matsumoto, Kenji
Takei, Yoshiki
Nishimura, Yasumasa
Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
title Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
title_full Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
title_short Dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of skin collimation with tungsten rubber for electron radiotherapy: a monte carlo study
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13210
work_keys_str_mv AT wakabayashikazuki dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy
AT monzenhajime dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy
AT tamuramikoto dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy
AT matsumotokenji dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy
AT takeiyoshiki dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy
AT nishimurayasumasa dosimetricevaluationofskincollimationwithtungstenrubberforelectronradiotherapyamontecarlostudy