Cargando…

A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator

PURPOSE: To validate an MR‐compatible version of the ScandiDos Delta(4) Phantom+ on a 0.35T MR guided linear accelerator (MR‐Linac) system and to determine the effect of plan complexity on the measurement results. METHODS/MATERIALS: 36 clinical treatment plans originally delivered on a 0.35T MR lina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desai, Vimal, Bayouth, John, Smilowitz, Jennifer, Yadav, Poonam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13216
_version_ 1783676724761853952
author Desai, Vimal
Bayouth, John
Smilowitz, Jennifer
Yadav, Poonam
author_facet Desai, Vimal
Bayouth, John
Smilowitz, Jennifer
Yadav, Poonam
author_sort Desai, Vimal
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To validate an MR‐compatible version of the ScandiDos Delta(4) Phantom+ on a 0.35T MR guided linear accelerator (MR‐Linac) system and to determine the effect of plan complexity on the measurement results. METHODS/MATERIALS: 36 clinical treatment plans originally delivered on a 0.35T MR linac system were re‐planned on the Delta(4) Phantom+ MR geometry following our clinical quality assurance (QA) protocol. The QA plans were then measured using the Delta(4) Phantom+ MR and the global gamma pass rates were compared to previous results measured using a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK‐MR. Both 3%/3mm and 2%/2mm global gamma pass rates with a 20% dose threshold were recorded and compared. Plan complexity was quantified for each clinical plan investigated using 24 different plan metrics and each metric’s correlation with the overall 2%/2mm global gamma pass rate was investigated using Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Both systems demonstrated comparable levels of gamma pass rates at both the 3%/3mm and 2%/2mm level for all plan complexity metrics. Nine plan metrics including area, number of active MLCs, perimeter, edge metric, leaf segment variability, complete irradiation area outline, irregularity, leaf travel index, and unique opening index were moderately (|r| > 0.5) correlated with the Delta(4) 2%/2mm global gamma pass rates whereas those same metrics had weak correlation with the ArcCHECK‐MR pass rates. Only the perimeter to area ratio and small aperture score (20 mm) metrics showed moderate correlation with the ArcCHECK‐MR gamma pass rates. CONCLUSIONS: The MR‐compatible version of the ScandiDos Delta(4) Phantom+ MR has been validated for clinical use on a 0.35T MR‐Linac with results being comparable to an ArcCHECK‐MR system in use clinically for almost five years. Most plan complexity metrics did not correlate with lower 2%/2mm gamma pass rates using the ArcCHECK‐MR but several metrics were found to be moderately correlated with lower 2%/2mm global gamma pass rates for the Delta(4) Phantom+ MR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80355592021-04-15 A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator Desai, Vimal Bayouth, John Smilowitz, Jennifer Yadav, Poonam J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To validate an MR‐compatible version of the ScandiDos Delta(4) Phantom+ on a 0.35T MR guided linear accelerator (MR‐Linac) system and to determine the effect of plan complexity on the measurement results. METHODS/MATERIALS: 36 clinical treatment plans originally delivered on a 0.35T MR linac system were re‐planned on the Delta(4) Phantom+ MR geometry following our clinical quality assurance (QA) protocol. The QA plans were then measured using the Delta(4) Phantom+ MR and the global gamma pass rates were compared to previous results measured using a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK‐MR. Both 3%/3mm and 2%/2mm global gamma pass rates with a 20% dose threshold were recorded and compared. Plan complexity was quantified for each clinical plan investigated using 24 different plan metrics and each metric’s correlation with the overall 2%/2mm global gamma pass rate was investigated using Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Both systems demonstrated comparable levels of gamma pass rates at both the 3%/3mm and 2%/2mm level for all plan complexity metrics. Nine plan metrics including area, number of active MLCs, perimeter, edge metric, leaf segment variability, complete irradiation area outline, irregularity, leaf travel index, and unique opening index were moderately (|r| > 0.5) correlated with the Delta(4) 2%/2mm global gamma pass rates whereas those same metrics had weak correlation with the ArcCHECK‐MR pass rates. Only the perimeter to area ratio and small aperture score (20 mm) metrics showed moderate correlation with the ArcCHECK‐MR gamma pass rates. CONCLUSIONS: The MR‐compatible version of the ScandiDos Delta(4) Phantom+ MR has been validated for clinical use on a 0.35T MR‐Linac with results being comparable to an ArcCHECK‐MR system in use clinically for almost five years. Most plan complexity metrics did not correlate with lower 2%/2mm gamma pass rates using the ArcCHECK‐MR but several metrics were found to be moderately correlated with lower 2%/2mm global gamma pass rates for the Delta(4) Phantom+ MR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8035559/ /pubmed/33666360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13216 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Desai, Vimal
Bayouth, John
Smilowitz, Jennifer
Yadav, Poonam
A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator
title A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator
title_full A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator
title_fullStr A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator
title_full_unstemmed A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator
title_short A clinical validation of the MR‐compatible Delta(4) QA system in a 0.35 tesla MR linear accelerator
title_sort clinical validation of the mr‐compatible delta(4) qa system in a 0.35 tesla mr linear accelerator
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33666360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13216
work_keys_str_mv AT desaivimal aclinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT bayouthjohn aclinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT smilowitzjennifer aclinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT yadavpoonam aclinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT desaivimal clinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT bayouthjohn clinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT smilowitzjennifer clinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator
AT yadavpoonam clinicalvalidationofthemrcompatibledelta4qasystemina035teslamrlinearaccelerator