Cargando…
Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks
PURPOSE: Studies have evaluated the viability of using open‐face masks as an immobilization technique to treat intracranial and head and neck cancers. This method offers less stress to the patient with comparable accuracy to closed‐face masks. Open‐face masks permit implementation of surface guided...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33739569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13170 |
_version_ | 1783676725463351296 |
---|---|
author | Bry, Victoria Licon, Anna Laura McCulloch, James Kirby, Neil Myers, Pamela Saenz, Daniel Stathakis, Sotirios Papanikolaou, Niko Rasmussen, Karl |
author_facet | Bry, Victoria Licon, Anna Laura McCulloch, James Kirby, Neil Myers, Pamela Saenz, Daniel Stathakis, Sotirios Papanikolaou, Niko Rasmussen, Karl |
author_sort | Bry, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Studies have evaluated the viability of using open‐face masks as an immobilization technique to treat intracranial and head and neck cancers. This method offers less stress to the patient with comparable accuracy to closed‐face masks. Open‐face masks permit implementation of surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) to assist in positioning and motion management. Research suggests that changes in patient facial expressions may influence the SGRT system to generate false positional corrections. This study aims to quantify these errors produced by the SGRT system due to face motion. METHODS: Ten human subjects were immobilized using open‐face masks. Four discrete SGRT regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed based on anatomical features to simulate different mask openings. The largest ROI was lateral to the cheeks, superior to the eyebrows, and inferior to the mouth. The smallest ROI included only the eyes and bridge of the nose. Subjects were asked to open and close their eyes and simulate fear and annoyance and peak isocenter shifts were recorded. This was performed in both standard and SRS specific resolutions with the C‐RAD Catalyst HD system. RESULTS: All four ROIs analyzed in SRS and Standard resolutions demonstrated an average deviation of 0.3 ± 0.3 mm for eyes closed and 0.4 ± 0.4 mm shift for eyes open, and 0.3 ± 0.3 mm for eyes closed and 0.8 ± 0.9 mm shift for eyes open. The average deviation observed due to changing facial expressions was 1.4 ± 0.9 mm for SRS specific and 1.6 ± 1.6 mm for standard resolution. CONCLUSION: The SGRT system can generate false positional corrections for face motion and this is amplified at lower resolutions and smaller ROIs. These errors should be considered in the overall tolerances and treatment plan when using open‐face masks with SGRT and may warrant additional radiographic imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8035563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80355632021-04-15 Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks Bry, Victoria Licon, Anna Laura McCulloch, James Kirby, Neil Myers, Pamela Saenz, Daniel Stathakis, Sotirios Papanikolaou, Niko Rasmussen, Karl J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: Studies have evaluated the viability of using open‐face masks as an immobilization technique to treat intracranial and head and neck cancers. This method offers less stress to the patient with comparable accuracy to closed‐face masks. Open‐face masks permit implementation of surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) to assist in positioning and motion management. Research suggests that changes in patient facial expressions may influence the SGRT system to generate false positional corrections. This study aims to quantify these errors produced by the SGRT system due to face motion. METHODS: Ten human subjects were immobilized using open‐face masks. Four discrete SGRT regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed based on anatomical features to simulate different mask openings. The largest ROI was lateral to the cheeks, superior to the eyebrows, and inferior to the mouth. The smallest ROI included only the eyes and bridge of the nose. Subjects were asked to open and close their eyes and simulate fear and annoyance and peak isocenter shifts were recorded. This was performed in both standard and SRS specific resolutions with the C‐RAD Catalyst HD system. RESULTS: All four ROIs analyzed in SRS and Standard resolutions demonstrated an average deviation of 0.3 ± 0.3 mm for eyes closed and 0.4 ± 0.4 mm shift for eyes open, and 0.3 ± 0.3 mm for eyes closed and 0.8 ± 0.9 mm shift for eyes open. The average deviation observed due to changing facial expressions was 1.4 ± 0.9 mm for SRS specific and 1.6 ± 1.6 mm for standard resolution. CONCLUSION: The SGRT system can generate false positional corrections for face motion and this is amplified at lower resolutions and smaller ROIs. These errors should be considered in the overall tolerances and treatment plan when using open‐face masks with SGRT and may warrant additional radiographic imaging. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8035563/ /pubmed/33739569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13170 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Bry, Victoria Licon, Anna Laura McCulloch, James Kirby, Neil Myers, Pamela Saenz, Daniel Stathakis, Sotirios Papanikolaou, Niko Rasmussen, Karl Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks |
title | Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks |
title_full | Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks |
title_fullStr | Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks |
title_short | Quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using SGRT with open‐face Masks |
title_sort | quantifying false positional corrections due to facial motion using sgrt with open‐face masks |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33739569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bryvictoria quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT liconannalaura quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT mccullochjames quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT kirbyneil quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT myerspamela quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT saenzdaniel quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT stathakissotirios quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT papanikolaouniko quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks AT rasmussenkarl quantifyingfalsepositionalcorrectionsduetofacialmotionusingsgrtwithopenfacemasks |