Cargando…
Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
BACKGROUND: Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_76_20 |
_version_ | 1783676731792556032 |
---|---|
author | Bir, Megha Gupta, Uditi Jaryal, Ashok Kumar Singh, Akanksha Netam, Ritesh Kale, Shashank Sharad Chandra, Sarat P Singh, Manmohan Rath, Girija Prasad |
author_facet | Bir, Megha Gupta, Uditi Jaryal, Ashok Kumar Singh, Akanksha Netam, Ritesh Kale, Shashank Sharad Chandra, Sarat P Singh, Manmohan Rath, Girija Prasad |
author_sort | Bir, Megha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized technique for corticospinal tract monitoring. The comparative clinical value of these two techniques has not been evaluated in the patients with preoperative deficits. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the predictive utility of myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials (m-MEP) and D-wave in terms of recordability and their sensitivity and specificity in predicting transient and permanent new motor deficits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with preoperative motor deficit scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative m-MEP and D-wave changes were identified and correlated with postoperative neurology in the immediate postoperative period and at the time of discharge. RESULTS: The mean preoperative motor power of the patient pool in left and right lower limb was 2.97 ± 1.56 and 3.32 ± 1.49, respectively. The recordability of m-MEPs and D-wave was observed to be 79.4% and 100%, respectively. The m-MEP predicted the motor deterioration in immediate postoperative period with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity, while D-wave had 14% sensitivity and 100% specificity. At the time of discharge, m-MEPs' specificity reduced to 61%, while D-wave demonstrated 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: D-wave has a better recordability than m-MEPs in neurologically compromised patients. D-wave predicts development of long-term deficits with 100% specificity, while m-MEPs have a high sensitivity for transient neurological deficit. A combination of D-wave and m-MEP is recommended for monitoring the integrity of the corticospinal tract in patients with preoperative motor deficits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8035592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80355922021-04-12 Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period Bir, Megha Gupta, Uditi Jaryal, Ashok Kumar Singh, Akanksha Netam, Ritesh Kale, Shashank Sharad Chandra, Sarat P Singh, Manmohan Rath, Girija Prasad J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized technique for corticospinal tract monitoring. The comparative clinical value of these two techniques has not been evaluated in the patients with preoperative deficits. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the predictive utility of myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials (m-MEP) and D-wave in terms of recordability and their sensitivity and specificity in predicting transient and permanent new motor deficits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with preoperative motor deficit scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative m-MEP and D-wave changes were identified and correlated with postoperative neurology in the immediate postoperative period and at the time of discharge. RESULTS: The mean preoperative motor power of the patient pool in left and right lower limb was 2.97 ± 1.56 and 3.32 ± 1.49, respectively. The recordability of m-MEPs and D-wave was observed to be 79.4% and 100%, respectively. The m-MEP predicted the motor deterioration in immediate postoperative period with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity, while D-wave had 14% sensitivity and 100% specificity. At the time of discharge, m-MEPs' specificity reduced to 61%, while D-wave demonstrated 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: D-wave has a better recordability than m-MEPs in neurologically compromised patients. D-wave predicts development of long-term deficits with 100% specificity, while m-MEPs have a high sensitivity for transient neurological deficit. A combination of D-wave and m-MEP is recommended for monitoring the integrity of the corticospinal tract in patients with preoperative motor deficits. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8035592/ /pubmed/33850378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_76_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bir, Megha Gupta, Uditi Jaryal, Ashok Kumar Singh, Akanksha Netam, Ritesh Kale, Shashank Sharad Chandra, Sarat P Singh, Manmohan Rath, Girija Prasad Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
title | Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
title_full | Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
title_fullStr | Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
title_short | Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
title_sort | predictive value of intraoperative d-wave and m-mep neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_76_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birmegha predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT guptauditi predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT jaryalashokkumar predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT singhakanksha predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT netamritesh predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT kaleshashanksharad predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT chandrasaratp predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT singhmanmohan predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod AT rathgirijaprasad predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod |