Cargando…

Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period

BACKGROUND: Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bir, Megha, Gupta, Uditi, Jaryal, Ashok Kumar, Singh, Akanksha, Netam, Ritesh, Kale, Shashank Sharad, Chandra, Sarat P, Singh, Manmohan, Rath, Girija Prasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850378
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_76_20
_version_ 1783676731792556032
author Bir, Megha
Gupta, Uditi
Jaryal, Ashok Kumar
Singh, Akanksha
Netam, Ritesh
Kale, Shashank Sharad
Chandra, Sarat P
Singh, Manmohan
Rath, Girija Prasad
author_facet Bir, Megha
Gupta, Uditi
Jaryal, Ashok Kumar
Singh, Akanksha
Netam, Ritesh
Kale, Shashank Sharad
Chandra, Sarat P
Singh, Manmohan
Rath, Girija Prasad
author_sort Bir, Megha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized technique for corticospinal tract monitoring. The comparative clinical value of these two techniques has not been evaluated in the patients with preoperative deficits. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the predictive utility of myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials (m-MEP) and D-wave in terms of recordability and their sensitivity and specificity in predicting transient and permanent new motor deficits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with preoperative motor deficit scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative m-MEP and D-wave changes were identified and correlated with postoperative neurology in the immediate postoperative period and at the time of discharge. RESULTS: The mean preoperative motor power of the patient pool in left and right lower limb was 2.97 ± 1.56 and 3.32 ± 1.49, respectively. The recordability of m-MEPs and D-wave was observed to be 79.4% and 100%, respectively. The m-MEP predicted the motor deterioration in immediate postoperative period with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity, while D-wave had 14% sensitivity and 100% specificity. At the time of discharge, m-MEPs' specificity reduced to 61%, while D-wave demonstrated 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: D-wave has a better recordability than m-MEPs in neurologically compromised patients. D-wave predicts development of long-term deficits with 100% specificity, while m-MEPs have a high sensitivity for transient neurological deficit. A combination of D-wave and m-MEP is recommended for monitoring the integrity of the corticospinal tract in patients with preoperative motor deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80355922021-04-12 Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period Bir, Megha Gupta, Uditi Jaryal, Ashok Kumar Singh, Akanksha Netam, Ritesh Kale, Shashank Sharad Chandra, Sarat P Singh, Manmohan Rath, Girija Prasad J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: Presence of preoperative motor deficits in patients poses a distinct challenge in monitoring the integrity of corticospinal tracts during spinal surgeries. The inconsistency of the motor-evoked potentials is such patients, limits its clinical utility. D-wave is a robust but less utilized technique for corticospinal tract monitoring. The comparative clinical value of these two techniques has not been evaluated in the patients with preoperative deficits. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the predictive utility of myogenic Motor Evoked Potentials (m-MEP) and D-wave in terms of recordability and their sensitivity and specificity in predicting transient and permanent new motor deficits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with preoperative motor deficit scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative m-MEP and D-wave changes were identified and correlated with postoperative neurology in the immediate postoperative period and at the time of discharge. RESULTS: The mean preoperative motor power of the patient pool in left and right lower limb was 2.97 ± 1.56 and 3.32 ± 1.49, respectively. The recordability of m-MEPs and D-wave was observed to be 79.4% and 100%, respectively. The m-MEP predicted the motor deterioration in immediate postoperative period with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity, while D-wave had 14% sensitivity and 100% specificity. At the time of discharge, m-MEPs' specificity reduced to 61%, while D-wave demonstrated 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: D-wave has a better recordability than m-MEPs in neurologically compromised patients. D-wave predicts development of long-term deficits with 100% specificity, while m-MEPs have a high sensitivity for transient neurological deficit. A combination of D-wave and m-MEP is recommended for monitoring the integrity of the corticospinal tract in patients with preoperative motor deficits. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8035592/ /pubmed/33850378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_76_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bir, Megha
Gupta, Uditi
Jaryal, Ashok Kumar
Singh, Akanksha
Netam, Ritesh
Kale, Shashank Sharad
Chandra, Sarat P
Singh, Manmohan
Rath, Girija Prasad
Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
title Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
title_full Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
title_fullStr Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
title_short Predictive value of intraoperative D-wave and m-MEP neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
title_sort predictive value of intraoperative d-wave and m-mep neurophysiological monitoring in patients with preoperative motor deficits in immediate and late postoperative period
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850378
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_76_20
work_keys_str_mv AT birmegha predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT guptauditi predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT jaryalashokkumar predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT singhakanksha predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT netamritesh predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT kaleshashanksharad predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT chandrasaratp predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT singhmanmohan predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod
AT rathgirijaprasad predictivevalueofintraoperativedwaveandmmepneurophysiologicalmonitoringinpatientswithpreoperativemotordeficitsinimmediateandlatepostoperativeperiod