Cargando…

Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a significant public health problem affecting a large proportion of the population and is associated with adverse health consequences and a substantial economic burden. Despite the existence of effective treatment, undiagnosed OSA remains a challenge. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natsky, Andrea N., Vakulin, Andrew, Coetzer, Ching Li Chai, McEvoy, R. D., Adams, Robert J., Kaambwa, Billingsley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01651-3
_version_ 1783676770273198080
author Natsky, Andrea N.
Vakulin, Andrew
Coetzer, Ching Li Chai
McEvoy, R. D.
Adams, Robert J.
Kaambwa, Billingsley
author_facet Natsky, Andrea N.
Vakulin, Andrew
Coetzer, Ching Li Chai
McEvoy, R. D.
Adams, Robert J.
Kaambwa, Billingsley
author_sort Natsky, Andrea N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a significant public health problem affecting a large proportion of the population and is associated with adverse health consequences and a substantial economic burden. Despite the existence of effective treatment, undiagnosed OSA remains a challenge. The gold standard diagnostic tool is polysomnography (PSG), yet the test is expensive, labour intensive and time-consuming. Home-based, limited channel sleep study testing (levels 3 and 4) can advance and widen access to diagnostic services. This systematic review aims to summarise available evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of limited channel tests compared to laboratory and home PSG in diagnosing OSA. METHODS: Eligible studies will be identified using a comprehensive strategy across the following databases from inception onwards: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Emcare and Web of Science Core Collection and ProQuest databases. The search will include a full economic evaluation (i.e. cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-consequences and cost-minimisation analysis) that assesses limited channel tests and PSG. Two reviewers will screen, extract data for included studies and critically appraise the articles for bias and quality. Meta-analyses will be conducted if aggregation of outcomes can be performed. Qualitative synthesis using a dominance ranking matrix will be performed for heterogeneous data. DISCUSSION: This systematic review protocol uses a rigorous, reproducible and transparent methodology and eligibility criteria to provide the current evidence relating to the clinical and economic impact of limited channel and full PSG OSA diagnostic tests. Evidence will be examined using standardised tools specific for economic evaluation studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020150130): SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01651-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80357712021-04-12 Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol Natsky, Andrea N. Vakulin, Andrew Coetzer, Ching Li Chai McEvoy, R. D. Adams, Robert J. Kaambwa, Billingsley Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a significant public health problem affecting a large proportion of the population and is associated with adverse health consequences and a substantial economic burden. Despite the existence of effective treatment, undiagnosed OSA remains a challenge. The gold standard diagnostic tool is polysomnography (PSG), yet the test is expensive, labour intensive and time-consuming. Home-based, limited channel sleep study testing (levels 3 and 4) can advance and widen access to diagnostic services. This systematic review aims to summarise available evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of limited channel tests compared to laboratory and home PSG in diagnosing OSA. METHODS: Eligible studies will be identified using a comprehensive strategy across the following databases from inception onwards: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Emcare and Web of Science Core Collection and ProQuest databases. The search will include a full economic evaluation (i.e. cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-consequences and cost-minimisation analysis) that assesses limited channel tests and PSG. Two reviewers will screen, extract data for included studies and critically appraise the articles for bias and quality. Meta-analyses will be conducted if aggregation of outcomes can be performed. Qualitative synthesis using a dominance ranking matrix will be performed for heterogeneous data. DISCUSSION: This systematic review protocol uses a rigorous, reproducible and transparent methodology and eligibility criteria to provide the current evidence relating to the clinical and economic impact of limited channel and full PSG OSA diagnostic tests. Evidence will be examined using standardised tools specific for economic evaluation studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020150130): SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01651-3. BioMed Central 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8035771/ /pubmed/33836806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01651-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Natsky, Andrea N.
Vakulin, Andrew
Coetzer, Ching Li Chai
McEvoy, R. D.
Adams, Robert J.
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
title Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
title_full Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
title_short Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
title_sort economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33836806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01651-3
work_keys_str_mv AT natskyandrean economicevaluationofdiagnosticsleepstudiesforobstructivesleepapnoeaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT vakulinandrew economicevaluationofdiagnosticsleepstudiesforobstructivesleepapnoeaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT coetzerchinglichai economicevaluationofdiagnosticsleepstudiesforobstructivesleepapnoeaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mcevoyrd economicevaluationofdiagnosticsleepstudiesforobstructivesleepapnoeaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT adamsrobertj economicevaluationofdiagnosticsleepstudiesforobstructivesleepapnoeaasystematicreviewprotocol
AT kaambwabillingsley economicevaluationofdiagnosticsleepstudiesforobstructivesleepapnoeaasystematicreviewprotocol