Cargando…

Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study

AIMS: The scope of this study was to analyze the influence of clinically feasible implant diameter and length on the stress transmitted to the peri-implant bone in the case of a resorbed and bone augmented mandible through finite element analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forna, Doriana Agop, Forna, Norina Consuela, Butnaru Moldoveanu, Sînziana Anca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_366_19
_version_ 1783676785117888512
author Forna, Doriana Agop
Forna, Norina Consuela
Butnaru Moldoveanu, Sînziana Anca
author_facet Forna, Doriana Agop
Forna, Norina Consuela
Butnaru Moldoveanu, Sînziana Anca
author_sort Forna, Doriana Agop
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The scope of this study was to analyze the influence of clinically feasible implant diameter and length on the stress transmitted to the peri-implant bone in the case of a resorbed and bone augmented mandible through finite element analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in silico. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Resorbed and bone-augmented 3D models were derived from in vivo cone-beam computed tomography scans of the same patient. Corresponding implant systems were modeled with the diameter ranging from 3.3 to 6 mm and length ranging from 5 to 13 mm, and masticatory loads were applied on the abutment surface. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: None. RESULTS: In the bone augmented ridge, maximum stress values in the peri-implant region drastically decreased only when using implants of a diameter of 5 mm and 6 mm. Implants up to 4 mm in diameter led to comparable stress values with the ones obtained in the resorbed ridge, when using the larger implants. The increase of length reduced stress in the resorbed mandible, whereas in the bone augmented model, it led to small variations only in implants up to 4 mm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that bone augmentation provides the optimal framework for clinicians to use larger implants, which, in turn, reduces stress in the peri-implant region. Diameter and length play an equally important role in decreasing stress. Implant dimensions should be carefully considered with ridge geometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80358422021-04-12 Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study Forna, Doriana Agop Forna, Norina Consuela Butnaru Moldoveanu, Sînziana Anca Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIMS: The scope of this study was to analyze the influence of clinically feasible implant diameter and length on the stress transmitted to the peri-implant bone in the case of a resorbed and bone augmented mandible through finite element analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in silico. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Resorbed and bone-augmented 3D models were derived from in vivo cone-beam computed tomography scans of the same patient. Corresponding implant systems were modeled with the diameter ranging from 3.3 to 6 mm and length ranging from 5 to 13 mm, and masticatory loads were applied on the abutment surface. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: None. RESULTS: In the bone augmented ridge, maximum stress values in the peri-implant region drastically decreased only when using implants of a diameter of 5 mm and 6 mm. Implants up to 4 mm in diameter led to comparable stress values with the ones obtained in the resorbed ridge, when using the larger implants. The increase of length reduced stress in the resorbed mandible, whereas in the bone augmented model, it led to small variations only in implants up to 4 mm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that bone augmentation provides the optimal framework for clinicians to use larger implants, which, in turn, reduces stress in the peri-implant region. Diameter and length play an equally important role in decreasing stress. Implant dimensions should be carefully considered with ridge geometry. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8035842/ /pubmed/33850399 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_366_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Forna, Doriana Agop
Forna, Norina Consuela
Butnaru Moldoveanu, Sînziana Anca
Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study
title Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study
title_full Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study
title_fullStr Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study
title_short Influence of Implant Dimensions in the Resorbed and Bone Augmented Mandible: A Finite Element Study
title_sort influence of implant dimensions in the resorbed and bone augmented mandible: a finite element study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_366_19
work_keys_str_mv AT fornadorianaagop influenceofimplantdimensionsintheresorbedandboneaugmentedmandibleafiniteelementstudy
AT fornanorinaconsuela influenceofimplantdimensionsintheresorbedandboneaugmentedmandibleafiniteelementstudy
AT butnarumoldoveanusinzianaanca influenceofimplantdimensionsintheresorbedandboneaugmentedmandibleafiniteelementstudy