Cargando…

Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant

OBJECTIVES: We provide an appraisal of recent research on stimulation of the auditory system with light. In particular, we discuss direct infrared stimulation and ongoing controversies regarding the feasibility of this modality. We also discuss advancements and barriers to the development of an opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Littlefield, Philip D., Richter, Claus‐Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.541
_version_ 1783676802529492992
author Littlefield, Philip D.
Richter, Claus‐Peter
author_facet Littlefield, Philip D.
Richter, Claus‐Peter
author_sort Littlefield, Philip D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We provide an appraisal of recent research on stimulation of the auditory system with light. In particular, we discuss direct infrared stimulation and ongoing controversies regarding the feasibility of this modality. We also discuss advancements and barriers to the development of an optical cochlear implant. METHODS: This is a review article that covers relevant animal studies. RESULTS: The auditory system has been stimulated with infrared light, and in a much more spatially selective manner than with electrical stimulation. However, there are experiments from other labs that have not been able to reproduce these results. This has resulted in an ongoing controversy regarding the feasibility of infrared stimulation, and the reasons for these experimental differences still require explanation. The neural response characteristics also appear to be much different than with electrical stimulation. The electrical stimulation paradigms used for modern cochlear implants do not apply well to optical stimulation and new coding strategies are under development. Stimulation with infrared light brings the risk of heat accumulation in the tissue at high pulse repetition rates, so optimal pulse shapes and combined optical/electrical stimulation are being investigated to mitigate this. Optogenetics is another promising technique, which makes neurons more sensitive to light stimulation by inserting light sensitive ion channels via viral vectors. Challenges of optogenetics include the expression of light sensitive channels in sufficient density in the target neurons, and the risk of damaging neurons by the expression of a foreign protein. CONCLUSION: Optical stimulation of the nervous system is a promising new field, and there has been progress toward the development of a cochlear implant that takes advantage of the benefits of optical stimulation. There are barriers, and controversies, but so far none that seem intractable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA (animal studies and basic research).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80359372021-04-15 Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant Littlefield, Philip D. Richter, Claus‐Peter Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: We provide an appraisal of recent research on stimulation of the auditory system with light. In particular, we discuss direct infrared stimulation and ongoing controversies regarding the feasibility of this modality. We also discuss advancements and barriers to the development of an optical cochlear implant. METHODS: This is a review article that covers relevant animal studies. RESULTS: The auditory system has been stimulated with infrared light, and in a much more spatially selective manner than with electrical stimulation. However, there are experiments from other labs that have not been able to reproduce these results. This has resulted in an ongoing controversy regarding the feasibility of infrared stimulation, and the reasons for these experimental differences still require explanation. The neural response characteristics also appear to be much different than with electrical stimulation. The electrical stimulation paradigms used for modern cochlear implants do not apply well to optical stimulation and new coding strategies are under development. Stimulation with infrared light brings the risk of heat accumulation in the tissue at high pulse repetition rates, so optimal pulse shapes and combined optical/electrical stimulation are being investigated to mitigate this. Optogenetics is another promising technique, which makes neurons more sensitive to light stimulation by inserting light sensitive ion channels via viral vectors. Challenges of optogenetics include the expression of light sensitive channels in sufficient density in the target neurons, and the risk of damaging neurons by the expression of a foreign protein. CONCLUSION: Optical stimulation of the nervous system is a promising new field, and there has been progress toward the development of a cochlear implant that takes advantage of the benefits of optical stimulation. There are barriers, and controversies, but so far none that seem intractable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA (animal studies and basic research). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8035937/ /pubmed/33869763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.541 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Littlefield, Philip D.
Richter, Claus‐Peter
Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
title Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
title_full Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
title_fullStr Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
title_full_unstemmed Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
title_short Near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: A decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
title_sort near‐infrared stimulation of the auditory nerve: a decade of progress toward an optical cochlear implant
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.541
work_keys_str_mv AT littlefieldphilipd nearinfraredstimulationoftheauditorynerveadecadeofprogresstowardanopticalcochlearimplant
AT richterclauspeter nearinfraredstimulationoftheauditorynerveadecadeofprogresstowardanopticalcochlearimplant