Cargando…

Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database

OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lenze, Nicholas R., Mihalic, Angela P., DeMason, Christine E., Shah, Rupali N., Buckmire, Robert A., Thorp, Brian D., Ebert, Charles S., Zanation, Adam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predictors associated with a successful match were examined using Chi‐square tests, two‐sided t‐tests, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 315 otolaryngology residency applicants responded to the survey of whom 274 matched (87%) and 41 did not match (13%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher mean USMLE Step 1 score (P = .016) and Step 2 CK score (P = .007). There were no significant differences in AOA status (45% vs 36%; P = .207), mean number of applications submitted (70 vs 69; P = .544), and mean number of away rotations (2.1 vs 2.0; P = .687) between matched and unmatched applicants. Significant predictors of a successful match included receiving honors in 5 or more clerkships (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0‐4.0; P = .040), receiving honors in an ENT clerkship (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0‐12.9; P = .044), and having 3 or more peer‐reviewed publications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1‐4.5; P = .020). The majority of applicants (79.9%) matched at a program where they either did an away rotation, had a personal geographic connection, or attended medical school in the same geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Board scores, excelling on clinical rotations, and having productive research experience appear to be strong predictors of a successful match in otolaryngology. The majority of applicants report a personal or geographic connection to the program at which they match. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.