Cargando…
Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549 |
_version_ | 1783676803216310272 |
---|---|
author | Lenze, Nicholas R. Mihalic, Angela P. DeMason, Christine E. Shah, Rupali N. Buckmire, Robert A. Thorp, Brian D. Ebert, Charles S. Zanation, Adam M. |
author_facet | Lenze, Nicholas R. Mihalic, Angela P. DeMason, Christine E. Shah, Rupali N. Buckmire, Robert A. Thorp, Brian D. Ebert, Charles S. Zanation, Adam M. |
author_sort | Lenze, Nicholas R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predictors associated with a successful match were examined using Chi‐square tests, two‐sided t‐tests, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 315 otolaryngology residency applicants responded to the survey of whom 274 matched (87%) and 41 did not match (13%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher mean USMLE Step 1 score (P = .016) and Step 2 CK score (P = .007). There were no significant differences in AOA status (45% vs 36%; P = .207), mean number of applications submitted (70 vs 69; P = .544), and mean number of away rotations (2.1 vs 2.0; P = .687) between matched and unmatched applicants. Significant predictors of a successful match included receiving honors in 5 or more clerkships (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0‐4.0; P = .040), receiving honors in an ENT clerkship (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0‐12.9; P = .044), and having 3 or more peer‐reviewed publications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1‐4.5; P = .020). The majority of applicants (79.9%) matched at a program where they either did an away rotation, had a personal geographic connection, or attended medical school in the same geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Board scores, excelling on clinical rotations, and having productive research experience appear to be strong predictors of a successful match in otolaryngology. The majority of applicants report a personal or geographic connection to the program at which they match. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8035942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80359422021-04-15 Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database Lenze, Nicholas R. Mihalic, Angela P. DeMason, Christine E. Shah, Rupali N. Buckmire, Robert A. Thorp, Brian D. Ebert, Charles S. Zanation, Adam M. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predictors associated with a successful match were examined using Chi‐square tests, two‐sided t‐tests, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 315 otolaryngology residency applicants responded to the survey of whom 274 matched (87%) and 41 did not match (13%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher mean USMLE Step 1 score (P = .016) and Step 2 CK score (P = .007). There were no significant differences in AOA status (45% vs 36%; P = .207), mean number of applications submitted (70 vs 69; P = .544), and mean number of away rotations (2.1 vs 2.0; P = .687) between matched and unmatched applicants. Significant predictors of a successful match included receiving honors in 5 or more clerkships (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0‐4.0; P = .040), receiving honors in an ENT clerkship (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0‐12.9; P = .044), and having 3 or more peer‐reviewed publications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1‐4.5; P = .020). The majority of applicants (79.9%) matched at a program where they either did an away rotation, had a personal geographic connection, or attended medical school in the same geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Board scores, excelling on clinical rotations, and having productive research experience appear to be strong predictors of a successful match in otolaryngology. The majority of applicants report a personal or geographic connection to the program at which they match. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8035942/ /pubmed/33869750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology Lenze, Nicholas R. Mihalic, Angela P. DeMason, Christine E. Shah, Rupali N. Buckmire, Robert A. Thorp, Brian D. Ebert, Charles S. Zanation, Adam M. Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database |
title | Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database |
title_full | Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database |
title_fullStr | Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database |
title_short | Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database |
title_sort | predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the texas star database |
topic | Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lenzenicholasr predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT mihalicangelap predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT demasonchristinee predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT shahrupalin predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT buckmireroberta predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT thorpbriand predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT ebertcharless predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase AT zanationadamm predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase |