Cargando…

Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database

OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lenze, Nicholas R., Mihalic, Angela P., DeMason, Christine E., Shah, Rupali N., Buckmire, Robert A., Thorp, Brian D., Ebert, Charles S., Zanation, Adam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549
_version_ 1783676803216310272
author Lenze, Nicholas R.
Mihalic, Angela P.
DeMason, Christine E.
Shah, Rupali N.
Buckmire, Robert A.
Thorp, Brian D.
Ebert, Charles S.
Zanation, Adam M.
author_facet Lenze, Nicholas R.
Mihalic, Angela P.
DeMason, Christine E.
Shah, Rupali N.
Buckmire, Robert A.
Thorp, Brian D.
Ebert, Charles S.
Zanation, Adam M.
author_sort Lenze, Nicholas R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predictors associated with a successful match were examined using Chi‐square tests, two‐sided t‐tests, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 315 otolaryngology residency applicants responded to the survey of whom 274 matched (87%) and 41 did not match (13%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher mean USMLE Step 1 score (P = .016) and Step 2 CK score (P = .007). There were no significant differences in AOA status (45% vs 36%; P = .207), mean number of applications submitted (70 vs 69; P = .544), and mean number of away rotations (2.1 vs 2.0; P = .687) between matched and unmatched applicants. Significant predictors of a successful match included receiving honors in 5 or more clerkships (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0‐4.0; P = .040), receiving honors in an ENT clerkship (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0‐12.9; P = .044), and having 3 or more peer‐reviewed publications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1‐4.5; P = .020). The majority of applicants (79.9%) matched at a program where they either did an away rotation, had a personal geographic connection, or attended medical school in the same geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Board scores, excelling on clinical rotations, and having productive research experience appear to be strong predictors of a successful match in otolaryngology. The majority of applicants report a personal or geographic connection to the program at which they match. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8035942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80359422021-04-15 Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database Lenze, Nicholas R. Mihalic, Angela P. DeMason, Christine E. Shah, Rupali N. Buckmire, Robert A. Thorp, Brian D. Ebert, Charles S. Zanation, Adam M. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology OBJECTIVES: To examine applicant characteristics and behaviors associated with a successful match into otolaryngology residency. METHODS: Self‐reported survey data from applicants to otolaryngology residency between 2018 and 2020 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Characteristics and predictors associated with a successful match were examined using Chi‐square tests, two‐sided t‐tests, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 315 otolaryngology residency applicants responded to the survey of whom 274 matched (87%) and 41 did not match (13%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher mean USMLE Step 1 score (P = .016) and Step 2 CK score (P = .007). There were no significant differences in AOA status (45% vs 36%; P = .207), mean number of applications submitted (70 vs 69; P = .544), and mean number of away rotations (2.1 vs 2.0; P = .687) between matched and unmatched applicants. Significant predictors of a successful match included receiving honors in 5 or more clerkships (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0‐4.0; P = .040), receiving honors in an ENT clerkship (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0‐12.9; P = .044), and having 3 or more peer‐reviewed publications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1‐4.5; P = .020). The majority of applicants (79.9%) matched at a program where they either did an away rotation, had a personal geographic connection, or attended medical school in the same geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Board scores, excelling on clinical rotations, and having productive research experience appear to be strong predictors of a successful match in otolaryngology. The majority of applicants report a personal or geographic connection to the program at which they match. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8035942/ /pubmed/33869750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
Lenze, Nicholas R.
Mihalic, Angela P.
DeMason, Christine E.
Shah, Rupali N.
Buckmire, Robert A.
Thorp, Brian D.
Ebert, Charles S.
Zanation, Adam M.
Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
title Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
title_full Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
title_fullStr Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
title_short Predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the Texas STAR database
title_sort predictors of otolaryngology applicant success using the texas star database
topic Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8035942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.549
work_keys_str_mv AT lenzenicholasr predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT mihalicangelap predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT demasonchristinee predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT shahrupalin predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT buckmireroberta predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT thorpbriand predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT ebertcharless predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase
AT zanationadamm predictorsofotolaryngologyapplicantsuccessusingthetexasstardatabase